Term Paper Writing Help | College Essay | Resume | Research Paper Writing | Thesis | Dissertation Writing

Excerpt from Essay:

Spending restrictions for corporations towards campaigns

.... have greater access to various elected officials, through the upper levels of the different political parties. After the law was enacted, there was a series of court challenges that caused the case go to the Supreme Court (Citizens Untied v. the Federal Election Commission). Where, the court ruled, that it was unconstitutional for the government to regulate the overall political contributions given to various parties. This was based largely on the interpretation that a corporation is considered to be the equivalent of an individual person in a legal sense. Therefore, to restrict the contributions of such organizations is a violation of the First Amendment. As a result, this decision is the equivalent of the Dredd Scott v. Sandford decision. Where, the court ruled that African Americans were not US citizens and were essentially slaves. However, within ten years, the Civil War and the Fourteenth Amendment would highlight how irresponsible the court was when they made such a decision. (Dredd Scott v. Sandford, 2010) A similar situation has occurred in the area of campaign finance, as the high court has made their own version of Dredd Scott case. This will have a number of disastrous consequences that will force the