Term Paper Writing Help | College Essay | Resume | Research Paper Writing | Thesis | Dissertation Writing

Excerpt from Peer Reviewed Journal:

Statutory Intrepretation and Statute Law Research

...... A fourth way that highlights how law enforcement is misinterpreting the law can be seen with the legal precedents established in Maxwell v Murphy and Polyukhovich v Commonwealth of Australia, Where, it states that Parliament should clearly state what their intentions are under the law. In this particular case, Parliament said that they were going after those kinds of chemicals that could be used in a terrorist style attack. This means that it is obvious that neither Helena nor Jonathan is involved in any kind of terrorist activity. The only logical explanation that Commonwealth Chemicals Commission officers can use is: that Jonathan has a criminal record as juvenile. Yet, they do not elaborate as to what his previous conviction was for. Judging from Jonathans age and Helena being unaware that they had a bottle of carpet cleaner with them, it is clear that the Commonwealth Chemicals Commission officers violated the basic provisions of the law. Where, neither one of them are involved in any kind of terrorist activity, which is the intention of Parliament under the law. Therefore, to prosecute Helena under the Act for retaining a carpet cleaner in a motel room (that she was unaware her brother