21st Century Oedipus A Blind Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:


Pioneer psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud was fascinated by the story of King Oedipus, as Sophocles depicted him within Oedipus the King, as a work of literature. Clearly, however, Freud also recognized how Sophocles's story, at least in a literal sense if not a figurative or psychological one, paralleled his particular new theory of early childhood development, that at the four-year-old stage, a child "falls in love" with the opposite sex parent and wishes, then, to kill the same-sex parent in order to destroy a rival. Freud made the name "Oedipus" far better known than it would otherwise have been.

Without Sophocles's play, of course, there would be no term like "Oedipus Complex," to describe today's best-known (theoretical) stage of early childhood development. However, Freud's theory is also very far from the story of Oedipus and his unfortunate fate, as told by Sophocles. Therefore, to think of King Oedipus only in terms of the Oedipus Complex of Freudian fame, is to seriously distort what we know of Oedipus through Sophocles' play. Be that as it may, however, the name "Oedipus" today is recognized much more as part of the term "Oedipus Complex" than as a tragedy by Sophocles.

Toward that result, Freud took considerable (psychological) license with the original Oedipus story when he wrote, in 1940 (An outline of psychoanalysis. Standard ed., 23, qtd. In Hartocollis, June 2005):

The ignorance of Oedipus is a legitimate representation of the unconscious state into which, for adults, the whole [early childhood development experience] has fallen; and the coercive power of the oracle [i.e., fate, in today's terms]... A recognition of the inevitability of the fate which has condemned every son to live through the Oedipus complex. (pp. 191-192) An outline of psychoanalysis. Standard ed., 23, qtd. In Hartocollis, June 2005)

Further, as Freud (1900) states:

In my experience the chief part in the mental lives of all children who later become psychoneurotics [sic] is played by their parents. Being in love with the one parent and hating the other are among the essential constituents of the stock of psychical impulses which is formed at that time and which is of such importance in determining the symptoms of the later neurosis.... This discovery is confirmed by legend that has come down to us from classical antiquity: a legend whose profound and universal power to move can be understood if the hypothesis I have put forward in regard to the psychology of children has an equally universal validity. (The Interpretation of Dreams. (Standard ed., 4, pp. 260-261, qtd. In Hartocollis, June 2005)

Freud further states, within The Ego and the Id. Standard ed., 19 (qtd. In Hartocollis, June 2005), in terms of the 'Oedipus Complex':

The boy's identification with his father... takes on a hostile coloring and changes into a wish to get rid of his father in order to take his place with his mother. Henceforth... An ambivalent attitude to his father and an object- relation of a solely affectionate kind to his mother make up the content of the simple positive Oedipus complex in a boy. (p. 32)

It is perhaps because Freud's 'Oedipus Complex' is a concept so relatively easy to understand, while Sophocles's play is relatively difficult to understand, that the 'Oedipus Complex', rather than the ancient play by Sophocles, continues to so capture our imagination today. The play Oedipus Rex, on the other hand, while still occasionally performed, is most frequently read nowadays in college or university literature or drama classes. A clue to the key reason for that may well lie within Freud's own misleading term. The 'Oedipus Complex' of Freud is straightforwardly universal while Sophocles's great tragedy is universally complex.

Works Cited

Aristotle, Poetics. Aristotle, Poetics. Retrieved August 8, 2005, at http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=PerseusAabo%3Atlg%2C0086%2C03.html>.

Hartocollis, Peter. "Origins and Evolution of the Oedipus Complex as Conceptualized by Freud." Psychoanalytic Review, Vol. 92, No. 3 (June 2005). 315-334.

Oedipus the King by Sophocles." Oedipus the King. Retrieved August 6, 2005, from: http://classics.uc.edu/~johnson/tragedy/Oedipus_king.html.

Sophocles. Oedipus the King. The Bedford Introduction to World Literature.

S. Barnet et al. (Eds.). New York: Bedford,…[continue]

Cite This Term Paper:

"21st Century Oedipus A Blind" (2005, August 08) Retrieved December 6, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/21st-century-oedipus-a-blind-67266

"21st Century Oedipus A Blind" 08 August 2005. Web.6 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/21st-century-oedipus-a-blind-67266>

"21st Century Oedipus A Blind", 08 August 2005, Accessed.6 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/21st-century-oedipus-a-blind-67266

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Comparing and Contrasting the Key Personality Theories and Theorists...

    Personality Theories in Psychology To the layperson, the term personality is a generic descriptor for an individual's traits. However, personality has a more specific meaning to psychologists. According to Dan McAdams, "Personality psychology is the scientific study of the whole person" (McAdams, 2006, p.12, para.1). While different psychologists and their theories have become well-known enough to be referenced in casual conversation, there is still some confusion among laypeople about personality

  • Compare and Contrast Traditional Theatre Grecian to Modern Theatre...

    Classical and Modern Greek Theater There are clear connections between the classical and modern theater in Greece - just as there are clear connections between the theater of classical Greece and the modern theater of the West in general. Much of what we believe to be proper theater-making comes from classical works: We still use many of the same ideas about character, about motif, about plot. But even as many of

  • Counseling Theories & 8230 THERE Is No

    & #8230; in its heyday there was elitism and arrogance among psychoanalysts, a sense of having superior knowledge that set us up for a fall" (Altman, ¶ 3). In a field that claims to possess knowledge of the unconscious, Altman asserts, this constitutes an occupational hazard. To counter the temptation to feel more knowledgeable than others, whether patients or the public in general, therapists who practice psychoanalytic therapy, need

Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved