Anticipatory Guidance Project Mammogram Screenings Guidelines the Essay

Download this Essay in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Essay:

Anticipatory Guidance Project

Mammogram screenings guidelines

The suitability of screening mammography has been a contentious issue because of a number of reasons. For instance, the lack of consistency of screening guidelines reveals the complexities in coming up with definitive conclusions on the suitability of the procedure. Another issue with mammographic screening is the degree to which a mammography helps to reduce mortality among women. There have been arguments from some quarters that there is no evidence that mammography reduces mortality. In addition, sometimes screening can provide false-positive results resulting in needless additional testing, which may include the probability of invasive surgical processes. These controversies have elicited intense debates from various components of the society.

Background information about the guidelines

The American Cancer Society gives a number of guidelines on mammogram screenings (The American Cancer Society, 2013). First, it recommends that women who are 40 years and older of age should undergo a mammogram every one year, and this should go on as long as the woman in question is in fine health. Second, women who are at a higher risk, that is, higher than 20% lifetime risk, should have a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and a mammogram every year. On the other hand, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) gives a number of changes in the screening guidelines for breast cancer (Nundy, 2010). The USPSTF, recommendations include changing the routine screening of an average-risk woman to begin at 50 years of age, instead of 40 years of age. The task force also recommended that the routine screening should be stopped at the age of 74 years. Another recommendation by the USPSTF is that mammograms should be done after every two years instead of every one year.

Purpose of the paper

The function of the paper is to give an analysis of the opposing guidelines on the mammogram screening by the United States Preventive Services Task Force, and the American Cancer Society. Of the two protocols, the researcher will select one that seems to provide suitable mammographic screening guidelines. This will help to construct an anticipatory guidance for the mammogram screenings. The guidelines that this study will use are the ones discussed above, that is the American Cancer Society guidelines and the United States Preventive Services Task Force guidelines.

Research supporting the protocols

According to Brant and Helms (2012), observational researches have shown that women between the ages of 40 and 49 are more likely to have late-stage cancers diagnosed, if they are screened at the interval of two years as compared to an interval of one year. This forms the basis of the USPSTF recommending that routine screening should be after every two years instead of one year. However, other studies on the cancers that occur between two screens have indicated that breast cancer grows faster in young women than in older women. This informs the American Cancer Society's recommendation for annual mammographic screening for women at 40 years and older. Despite this, the chance of diagnosing the disease in women between 40 and 49 years of age is extremely slim at about 2% while that of death is about 0.3%. According to Nundy (2010), there is no sufficient evidence to indicate that screening beyond the age of 75 years is beneficial. This is the reason why USPSTF recommended that mammographic screening should stop at the age of 74 as women older than 74 years are likely to die from other causes other than breast cancer. However, the health of women older than 75 years varies from one woman to another. According to Nundy (2010), there is no evidence to indicate that screening reduces mortality rates for women beyond the age 74 years. Regular exposure to mammographic screenings may have an influence on the outcome of the screenings, in most cases leading to false positives (Nundy, 2010). This is the reason why USPSTF recommends that screenings should be less often.

Protocol chosen

The protocol that is more suitable is that of the American Cancer Society. One needs to consider the fact that all women are at a risk of developing cancer, and therefore, should consider including as many as possibly one can. In addition, women beyond the age of 70 years are at an elevated risk of being affected by breast cancer, and therefore…[continue]

Cite This Essay:

"Anticipatory Guidance Project Mammogram Screenings Guidelines The" (2013, March 23) Retrieved December 7, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/anticipatory-guidance-project-mammogram-86912

"Anticipatory Guidance Project Mammogram Screenings Guidelines The" 23 March 2013. Web.7 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/anticipatory-guidance-project-mammogram-86912>

"Anticipatory Guidance Project Mammogram Screenings Guidelines The", 23 March 2013, Accessed.7 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/anticipatory-guidance-project-mammogram-86912


Read Full Essay
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved