Biological Weapons Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:

Biological Weapons: The 'Living' and Pervasive Weapons of Mass Destruction

The 'art' and methods of war have indeed gone a long way; from subsisting to crude metals and guns, human society has learned to manipulate Nature by using as one of its weapons of mass destruction organisms that create balance within the planet's ecosystem. Nuclear warheads, guns, and other artilleries and weaponry are no longer feasible arsenals of war, mainly because they are not energy- and economically-efficient, as biological weapons are. Biological weapons, is identified as a destructive medium which "consist of living, infectious microorganisms that are disseminated as aerosols through the atmosphere... are generally invisible, odorless, and tasteless" (Falkenrath, 1998). These characteristics of biological weapons make it a feasible medium for destruction, especially between warring nations/societies.

This paper traces the origins and history of biological weapons, especially in the United States. In knowing its history, this research also looks into the development of technology as one of the precursors that helped 'develop' and proliferate the creation of microorganisms that can destroy not only the human body, but the Earth's physical environment as well. Furthermore, the use of biological weapons as an alternative for weapons in the act of terrorism and as a means to destroy another nation or society is also studied and analyzed, thereby putting the production of biological weapons in its socio-political context. Classifications of biological weapons presently produced are also identified. Lastly, measures and policies formulated that aim to encourage and promote non-proliferation of biological weapons, a socio-political issue, is also tackled, providing tentative solutions to the increased use of biological weapons, thereby increasing the probability of its adverse effects to plague human society and the physical environment for years to come.

The origin and history of biological weapons can be traced as far back as the 14th century, where plague epidemics become biological weapons used by conquerors in order to easily overpower other nations/societies. In American history, biological weapons use is evident in the use of the smallpox disease as a way for the French and British forces to defeat the Native Americans, original inhabitants of the U.S. territory, in the 18th century (Lederberg, 1999:18-9). Biological weaponry has become more developed in the 20th century, during the First World War, when Germany used "wind-blown chlorine" as a weapon to physically weaken the enemy's army forces. Germany's use of chlorine later developed to phosgene to mustard gas, attacking the skin and lungs of its victims, proving itself to be a pervasive form of biological weapon, since gas masks proved to be "ineffective" protection to this biological weapon (Falkenrath, 1998).

After WWI, United States has become actively involved with the production of microorganisms that can be used as biological weapons. In 1942, U.S. launched an offensive biological program, producing cultured varieties of "numerous bacterial pathogens, toxins, and fungal plant pathogens that could be directed against crops to induce crop failure and famine... weapons for covert use utilizing cobra venom, saxitoxin, and other toxins... developed for use by the CIA..." (Lederberg, 1999:25). Although U.S. is now a staunch supporter of the non-proliferation programs on biological weapons, its production of microorganisms that has deadly effects on the human body and physical environment served as the catalyst for other nations to escalate production of biological weapons. In the race for political dominance and power, biological weapons served as a symbol of power and influence, where governments and leaderships' influence are gauged.

Classification of these biological weapons can be identified into three: skin-damaging agents, toxins, and nerve agents. Skin-damaging agents are chemical compounds that prove to be not only skin-damaging, but has effects that include, among others, "eye damage at low levels, pulmonary injury, systemic illness." A popular example of skin-damaging agents is the mustard gas, so-called because of the mustard-like smell that it emits. Initially used by the Germans, and later by the Allies, in World War I, mustard gas is hard to detect, and can produce physical disabilities for "short and long periods," as well as psychological ailments, which include "exhaustion, chronic anxiety, and poor morale," and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Augerson, 2000:51-2).

Toxins, on the other hand, are "natural poisons naturally produced by living organisms such as "bacteria, fungi, dinoflagellates, algae, plants, and animals (corals, snails, frogs, arachnids, and snakes)" (53). Originally used by India and China in 14th…[continue]

Cite This Term Paper:

"Biological Weapons" (2004, April 13) Retrieved November 28, 2016, from

"Biological Weapons" 13 April 2004. Web.28 November. 2016. <>

"Biological Weapons", 13 April 2004, Accessed.28 November. 2016,

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Biological Weapons How Real Is

    Having known the mounting dangers, many public health and bio-terrorism experts, members of Congress and some well-positioned Bush administration officials convey increasing discomfort about what they think are flaws in the country's bio-defenses. Over the earlier years, awareness steps have been made, mainly in the large cities. But most of necessary equipments are not available. The federal government's standard answer to the anthrax assaults of 2001 and the warning of

  • Biological Weapons Bioweapons Are Weaponry

    " Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2009. Encyclopaedia Britannica Online. 22 Apr. 2009 . Goldman, D. "The Generals and the Germs." Journal of Military History 73(2). Apr 2009: p. 531-569. Academic Search Complete. EBSCOHost. University of Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ. April 22, 2009 . Guillemin, J. "Germ Warfare Under the Microscope." Futurist 42(3) May/Jun 2008: p. 31. MasterFILE Premier. EBSCOHost. University of Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ. April 22, 2009 . Kelle, A. "Strengthening the Effectiveness of the BTW

  • Biological Weapon Detection Equipment Bioterrorism

    Smaller particles follow the fluid streamlines and exit the sample." (NATIBO, 2001) The method of operation of a "bubbler or impinger" is through "drawing aerosols through a current inlet tube and jet. Usually the jet is submerged in the liquid contained in the sampler." (NATIBO, 2001) the aerosol particles become capture din the base of the jet by the surface of the liquid as the air moves through the liquid.

  • Bioterrorism Biological Weapons Can Significantly Change the

    Bioterrorism Biological weapons can significantly change the battlefield. Today's leaders must always be on the watch for new threats that can arise in newly designed ways. The enemy is always planning to expose weaknesses in the defense. Biological weaponry is such a technology that can bring devastating effects and exploit weaknesses both tactically and strategically. The purpose of this essay is to examine the appeal of biological weapons to terrorist organizations.

  • Bioterrorism Biological Weapon Can Be Defined as

    Bioterrorism Biological weapon can be defined as any kind of organism such as the bacteria, fungi or viruses, or any toxin (poisonous compounds that are produced by organisms) that can be used to kill the host or kill/injure human beings. There are varying acts of bioterrorism ranging from a hoax to actual use of these biological weapons or agents. Of late, a very significant number of countries are pursuing the ownership

  • Bioterrorism the Virus Smallpox Used as a Biological Weapon

    smallpox as a weapon against societies. The writer explores the viability of using smallpox as a weapon as well as some of the things societies have done to prepare for such a possibility. In addition the education of the American public for such an attack is discussed. There were seven sources used to complete this paper. Bioterrorism has been a concern of the United States for many years. During most

  • Weapons of Mass Destruction and the Next

    Weapons of Mass Destruction and the Next Terror: Assessment of How a Significant Terrorist WMD Attack Might Be Conducted by a Non-State Actors Perpetrator and Why They Can't Stage an Attack Weapons of Mass Destructions (WMD) have considerable effect to the economies of both developed and developing countries. In the modern world, most terror groups have resolved to use Weapons of Mass Destruction to harm their enemies. The entire syndicate comprises

Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved