Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from essay:
Increasing their product lines with good products will increase their sales around the world.
The biggest threat that Coca-Cola faces is the intense competition that exists within the industry. Coca-Cola has three main competitors, these being: PepsiCo, Cadbury Schweppes, and the Cott Corporation. All of these companies have products that compete with Coca-Cola products around the world. The competition between Coca-Cola and Pepsi has dominated the industry for more than a century. Both companies have participated in fierce marketing campaigns along with much sponsorship. Trying to stay a step ahead of Pepsi has been a long concern for the Coca-Cola Company and doesn't seem to be letting up anytime soon.
In the financial analysis, I compared Coca-Cola with their three main competitors in the areas of Return on Assets (ROA), Current Ratio, and Debt to Asset Ratio and Inventory Turnover from 2006 to 2008. In looking at the ROA ratio (Ex.1), it can be seen that Coca-Cola's return on assets has remained relatively steady over the three-year period. Pepsi's ROA dropped slightly over the three-year period, while both Cadbury Schweppes and Cott dropped dramatically.
In looking at the current ratios of the four companies (Ex. 2), Coca-Cola's ratio has increased slightly over the three-year period. Pepsi's current ratio was steady the first two years of the period but then dropped slightly in 2008. Cadbury Schweppes ratio remained constant over the three-year period while the Cott Corp decreased slightly in the last year.
Ex. 3 shows the debt to asset ratios for all four companies. Coca-Cola's debt to asset ratio increased from 2006 to 2007 and then remained steady in 2008. Pepsi's ratio was steady in 2006 and 2007 and then increased in 2008. The debt to asset ratio for Cadbury Schweppes decreased from 2006 to 2007 but then rebounded nicely in 2008. The Cott Corporation's level was steady in 2006 and 2007 and then increased slightly in 2008.
The Inventory Turnover ratios for all four companies can be seen in Ex. 4. Coca-Cola's ratio dropped from 2006 to 2007 and then remained steady. Pepsi's inventory turnover ratio dropped from 2006 to 2007 and then remained steady in 2008. Cadbury Schweppes ratio dropped drastically from 2006 to 2007 and then rebounded slightly in 2008. The Cott Corporation's ratio remained steady over the entire three-year period showing their stability.
After looking at all three analysis surrounding Coca-Cola and the soft drink industry there are several recommendations that can be made. An immediate concern that Coca-Cola is facing is the ever growing concern with nutrition and healthy eating. Because of this push there has been a concern raised that soft drinks are unhealthy and not good for you. This thinking has caused some downfall in the sales of carbonated soft drinks. A recommendation for Coca-Cola would be to focus their immediate attention on their non-carbonated product lines. These would include juices, teas and sports drinks. Taking advantage of the ever growing market for sport industry is a great way for Coca-Cola to promote their sport drink line. Acquiring sponsorships in the sports arena will allow them to increase the promotion of their products through various mass medias.
In the short-term I would recommend that Coca-Cola focus maintaining the good relationships that they have with their bottler, suppliers and retailers. Their unique bottling system is a great asset to the success of their company as a whole. This system allows them to manage their business world wide in a very efficient manner. Each bottler has the responsibility of promoting and marketing their own strategies in order to increase sales in their region. They are also allowed to promote new products within their region with Coca-Cola's approval. In the short-term it is also important for Coca-Cola to maintain along with increasing their partnerships with famous restaurant chains around the world. This allows them to capitalize on more sales and great advertising. It is also important that they continue to keep a close eye on their biggest competitor in Pepsi. Pepsi is currently their biggest threat and thus warrants constant attention.
In the long-term, Coca-Cola needs to focus on regaining the trust of their employees along with increasing what they refer to as their bench strength. They also need to focus on the long-term push towards developing health products. The new overall push to get and stay healthier can be seen everywhere. The mass media and various consumer organizations are constantly informing the public that carbonated beverages are bad. There is an especially large campaign going on surrounding children and their health habits. Coca-Cola needs to take advantage of this trend by creating and promoting health drinks for kids. They have already begun to work on this concept with the release of a new healthy drink called "Kuhh" in Korea. Since the product was successful, their total sales increased and the image of Coca-Cola increased tremendously. They also released a new healthy drink, known as "Clear Day," which is a green tea drink. It was a big hit and increased sales immensely. Coca-Cola needs to run with this idea and work on developing new healthy drinks, especially those designed for children, around the world (the Chronicle of Coca-Cola, 2009).
A last recommendation that I have is for Coca-Cola to continue to invest money along with donations in order to better their overall image of a company that cares. They currently have an image of being one of the largest and best companies in the world. But their image is not always reflective of this around the world. Consumers have proven over time that those companies that make them feel special are those companies that do well. Consumer want to feel that they company cares about them and really wants to know what they want and what they need. Coca-Cola has done that in many of their markets across the globe, but need to work on the rest in order to gain as much market share as they can. Happy customers promote bigger sales and bigger profits.
Five Competitive Forces model Porter. (2009). Retrieved from Value-Based Management Web
Interview with Coke CEO Isdell. (2004). Retrieved August 6, 2009, from Beverage Digest Web
North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). (2008). Retrieved from U.S. Census
Bureau August 6, 2009, from Web site:
Soft Drinks & Diet Soft Drinks. (2009). Retrieved from American…[continue]
"Business Cola Wars The Product" (2009, August 07) Retrieved October 27, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/business-cola-wars-the-product-20074
"Business Cola Wars The Product" 07 August 2009. Web.27 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/business-cola-wars-the-product-20074>
"Business Cola Wars The Product", 07 August 2009, Accessed.27 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/business-cola-wars-the-product-20074
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010 Harvard Business Case 9-711-462 Five Forces in the cola industry: Porter's Five Forces Framework Power of buyers For concentrate owners: Strong. The power of buyers is extremely strong within the soda industry, given that consumers can quickly shift their alliance from one beverage to another. Also, cola is not strictly a 'necessity' as a product -- no one needs to drink soda, and consumers can easily
Cola Wars Threat of Entry of New Competition: Low. The economy of scale within the CSD industry requires enormous amount of capitol to enter into this market, making this threat relatively insignificant. - Threat of Substitutes: High. Colas are now part of many different selections of drinks. Health and medical experts also contribute to this theat. -Threat of Customer Buying Power: Medium. It appears the customer base will buy soft drinks with expendable cash, but harsh
Confidence in Hong Kong's legal system is a direct result of its links with the rest of the world. if, in our haste to use Chinese, we change the standard and the meaning of the law, and non-Chinese speakers get pushed out of practice, then we risk losing those links.' The traditional Chinese structure has focused on mediation for civil and commercial cases, with lawyers widely viewed as troublemakers, and
Business Before Referencing Tzu, Sun. The Art of War. Forward by James Clavell. New York: Hodder & Stoughton Ltd., What does an ancient Chinese classic about the nature of a now-obsolete form of warfare have to teach us, in modernity, about how to manage others and navigate the current business environment? A great deal, The Art of War's presence in many business class syllabuses would suggest. Indeed, certain aspects of The Art
Coca Cola Strategic Plan The Coca Cola Company embodies American ingenuity and capitalism. Since its inception in 1887, Coca Cola has provided happiness and prosperity to the world. Now, 125 years later, the Coca Cola Company has over 100,000 employees and nearly 3500 soft drink brands (1). What has made the Coca Cola Company so unique is its brand image. The Coca Cola brand is very important to the overall business success
Instead, the Cola Wars helped the industry grow. In 2000, for example, 41% of total non-alcoholic beverages sold were CSDs. In the late 1990s and into the 21st century, the drinks with high growth (and media hype) were non-carbonated juices, sports drinks, tea drinks, dairy drinks, and bottled water. Pepsi dominated this market with Gatorade, Lipton and Aquafina. The bottlers were also required to reinvest in more complex equipment
Coca Cola Company