Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
The graphic shown in Figure 1 was also provided in the article (Porter, 2008).
Figure 1: Five Forces Model
This model's effectiveness does not however capture the increasingly critical role of tacit and explicit knowledge in businesses. The tacit knowledge, of the type that is learned from the continual streamlining of core processes, is not easily captured and communicated. It is often called tribal knowledge as this type if intelligence often stays within workgroups where it originates and seldom is captured for broader use. Specific knowledge, or the type of intelligence that can easily be captured and communicated, is often not used to its full potential as well. Studies in the auto industry suggest that knowledge, not products or pricing, is the new competitive advantage (Dyer, Nobeoka, 2000). The Five Forces Model does not recognize how important knowledge is as a competitive force in the definition of competitive advantage and its role in defining competitive rivalries. The bargaining power of knowledge needs to be added as does the threat of falling behind the knowledge curve of an industry. An example of this dynamic is how Intel has continually reinvented itself first into microprocessors and later into entire motherboards, subassemblies for servers and chipsets for enabling networking communications. Knowledge is also critical for the development of trust across a value chain and with customers. The greater the knowledge a company has, the greater it can aspire to be a trusted advisor to customers and a trusted partner with suppliers. Knowledge, a catalyst of growth, deserves inclusion in the Five Forces Model because companies compete more on this dimension that any other. Trust is the new currency and the model needs to be updated to reflect this new focus on how knowledge can enable it.
3. How can a business best leverage its distinctive competencies into competitive advantage?
A business can best leverage its distinctive competencies by first concentrating on the intersection of its unique approach to processes, products and systems. The intersection of these three aspects of a company's business is a path to defining a rare, non-substitutable and highly valuable set of core competencies. The intersection of these three areas also leads to core competencies that are inimitable and nearly impossible to clone or replicate. The reason is that while competitors may study processes and even imitate product designs, the highly differentiated approach to defining the integration of systems to processes and products cannot be imitated without completely imitating an entire company culture. Figure 2 shows graphically how the integration of these core areas of a business can create a competitive advantage.
The Intersection of Process, Product and Systems Defines Competitive Advantage
This approach to defining a competitive advantage is also agile enough to deal with rapid changes in the market landscapes of industries businesses compete in as well. The unique integration of these three elements together, which will vary markedly by each business, defines the center of competitive advantage. For businesses that base their competitive advantage on process expertise as WalMart does with supply chain operations for example, the overlap will favor this process expertise. To challenge WalMart in this area of their business is nearly impossible given the depth of supplier integration they require. For Nike the overlap of these three factors will favor their product focus and ability to quickly launch entirely new product divisions in response to market opportunities. In conclusion, these three aspects of any business will vary so significantly that they form a reliable means of defining competitive advantage.
Jeffrey H. Dyer, & Kentaro Nobeoka. (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal: Special Issue: Strategic Networks, 21(3), 345-367.
Ormanidhi, O., & Stringa, O.. (2008). Porter's Model of Generic Competitive Strategies. Business Economics, 43(3), 55-64.
Michael E. Porter. (2008, January). THE FIVE COMPETITIVE FORCES THAT SHAPE STRATEGY. Harvard Business Review: Special HBS Centennial Issue, 86(1), 78-93.
Core Competency or Unique Strength of the Business
Products -- The delivered product or service to a customer, including the fulfillment of a service commitment (a flight on a passenger jet for example)
Processes -- The unique set of approaches businesses use to deliver value in…[continue]
"Business Strategies Why Is A" (2010, October 29) Retrieved December 9, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/business-strategies-why-is-a-7305
"Business Strategies Why Is A" 29 October 2010. Web.9 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/business-strategies-why-is-a-7305>
"Business Strategies Why Is A", 29 October 2010, Accessed.9 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/business-strategies-why-is-a-7305
Yet only 5 to 10% of these documents are readily available to managers for them to use in decision making. There is also the problem of documents not being standardized in a uniform pattern or structure. Managers and IT staff need a way to transform these documents into formats that can be compared and processed in order to support decision making. Document-driven DSS is making this concept a real
Likewise, public policies ranging from immigration to the war on drugs and the de-institutionalization of persons with mental illness also have a substantial impact on local corrections (Stinchcomb and McCampbell, 2008). The key to running a successful correctional institution is building an organization that is capable of good strategy execution. These types of facilities have a social responsibility not only to the prisoners that they house but also to the
The appendixes. Answer number 3 The online community presents the reader with a multitude of information on how to write the business plan. A valid source in this sense is represented by Maire Loughran's article on the About.com website. Throughout this article, the author identifies a total of eight key elements to be integrated in the business plan. These refer to the next ones: The executive summary which states the objectives of the
Business Consultant It is a basic maxim of good business practice that an organization must keep pace with the needs of its customers, and in fact, constantly strive to anticipate the needs of its customers. To achieve this, it is important that a company targets processes and resources on customers and commits itself to the strategic delivery of customer perceived value (Lowenstein, 1997, p. xxi). Currently, it is apparent that the
Most critical is the ability to capitalize on core competencies while also alleviating any cultural conflicts inherent in pursuing any diversification strategy (Doving, Gooderham, 2008). Related diversifications are related to core competencies can be seen in many industry value chains, especially in the financial services industry (Milberg, 2008). As related diversifications reduce the cultural, system and process risk of a merger or acquisition, they have been proven empirically to
These acquisitions are serious business dealings that require a lot of forethought and a lot of work to get through, but they are well worth it in the end because they cause a great benefit to the company that made the acquisition. Often, any problematic conditions also improve for the company that was acquired, although this is not always the case. For companies that acquire other companies for brand name
Conclusions The five forces model is well-designed but it is far from perfect, especially for the manager not proficient in its use. The model is complex and is subject to a fairly steep learning curve. A tremendous amount of data must be collected to use the model effectively, and the analysis needs to be conducted in an objective manner. Many recent criticisms reflect the viewpoint that the model does not apply