Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
(China, Sudan and the Darfur Conflict Fact Sheet). The types of arms that have been purchased by the Sudan from China since the 1990s include tanks, helicopters, and fighter aircraft as well as antipersonnel and antitank mines. There are many reports of the use of Chinese weapons in the ongoing struggle in the Sudan.
A according to a Sudanese government official. The SPLA in 1997 overran government garrison towns in the south, and in one town alone, Yei, a Human Rights Watch researcher saw eight Chinese 122 mm towed howitzers, five Chinese-made T-59 tanks, and one Chinese 37 mm anti-aircraft gun abandoned by the government army,,
China, Sudan and the Darfur Conflict Fact Sheet).
Other indications of the involvement and relationship between the two countries in terms of arms and weapons can be seen in the fact that China has aided Sudan in establishing three weapons manufacturing facilities in the country, which includes a facility for the assembly T-55 tanks. (China, Sudan and the Darfur Conflict Fact Sheet)
An important factor that adds to the complexity of the human rights issues is that China has established and maintains defense relationships with the Sudan. The significance of this is that this relationship is in defiance of a UN-imposed arms embargo against the country which has been in place for Darfur since 2005.
The other Ares of economic interrelationship between China include foreign investment and trade. Chins is Sudan's largest foreign investor and there are many Chinese firms who have interests in the energy-related sectors of the Sudanese economy. Chins is also Sudan's largest trading partner and Sudan accounts for 13% of China's total trade with Africa. (China, Sudan and the Darfur Conflict Fact Sheet)
Diplomat and political relationships
Diplomatic Bilateral ties exist between Beijing and Khartoum. This also includes high-level government visits and missions. An important aspect that reflects on the issue of human night and Chinese involvement or responsibility is that China insists in a policy of "non-interference" in Sudanese domestic issues. In other words, the diplomatic relationships between the two countries are not, according to the Chinese view, influenced by the human rights in the Sudan. This is an aspect that is at the centre of the controversy about China's involvement in the country and is related to the central question of whether China is to be held partly responsible for the genocide and human rights transgressions that are constantly reported. As will be discussed, the Chinese economic and military involvement in Sudan would seem to suggest that to a large extent they are responsible for much the conflict in the country - or that they at providing the means for the continuation of the conflict.
3. The question of Chinese responsibility for Darfur
The above analysis of the relationship China and Sudan leads to the central question of this paper: is China responsible for the continuation of the crisis in Darfur by its support for the Sudanese government? Two aspects should be considered in answering to this question. The first is the obvious fact that China supports the government of Sudan both militarily and economically in terms of trade agreements; as well as diplomatically and politically. To this extent, the argument can be made that as it has a very strong position from which it could have influenced and helped in stopping this genocidal conflict. The implied allegation is that China chooses not interfere for reasons of economic gain.
This argument has also to be considered in the light of a central aspect that emerges for the above analysis. This refers to the fact that China with growing population and economic requirements desperately needs resources; and that it has been forced to a certain extent by the dominance of powerful corporations to seek these resources in countries like Sudan. From this point-of-view China has seemingly little choice but to maintain a relationship with Sudan. However this argument does not effectively excuse it from a certain amount of complicity in the action of the Sudanese government.
An important aspect in terms of international relationships is that China has become one of the leading supporters of the Sudan at the United Nations. As one report contends, this factor is also "...the major impediment to strong UN Security Council action against the government of Sudan for its role in the mass killing and genocide in Darfur" (China, Sudan and the Darfur Conflict Fact Sheet). In other words, the allegation has been made that China is in fact preventing the cessation of the conflict by its support for the Sudanese government. One report also states,
China has succeeded in watering down or weakening several Security Council resolutions related to Darfur, including Resolution 1706, which authorized a robust peacekeeping force of 22,500 UN troops to protect civilians; China insisted this resolution be deployed only "with the consent" of Sudan.
China, Sudan and the Darfur Conflict Fact Sheet)
The international condemnation of China's role in the Darfur contact can be seen as being morally and ethically sustainable, even it one takes into account its economic dependent on the region.
Darfur has become a name that is synonymous with atrocity and the most severe breaches of human rights. China has constently accused in the Western media of, partnership of the world's fastest-growing oil consumer with a pariah state accused of fostering genocide in its western Darfur region. (Goodman). The fact and statistics leave little doubt that China is at least partly responsible for the situation in Darfur. However, what must also be taken into account and which is not always noted, is that China has a desperate need for resources to feed its growing economy.
Due to its influence in the region, China could be instrumental in reducing the conflict in the region. It has been suggested that it could play a constructive role in the region and positive action on the part of the Chinese government could alleviate the international pressure and condemnation of its involvement in the region. There are signs that China has already begun to realize this fact. There are reports of internal criticism of the relationship with the Sudanese at a " grassroots level" which has resulted in the 2008 summer games in Beijing being referred to as the "genocide Olympics." (Shaming China on Darfur) However, China's official stance remains that there is no evidence of any genocide in Darfur.
Calling on China: The China-Darfur Connection. December 2, 2007. http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2004/0805africa_cohen.aspx
China, Sudan and the Darfur Conflict Fact Sheet
Darfur: a genocide we can stop. December 3, 2007. http://www.darfurgenocide.org/
Goodman S. China Invests Heavily in Sudan's Oil Industry. December 2, 2007. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21143-2004Dec22.html
Shaming China on Darfur. December 2, 2007. http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/05/31/opinion/edsudan.php
Sudan: Death Toll in Darfur.Bureau of Intelligence and Research
Washington, DC. 2005. December 3, 2007. http://www.state.gov/s/inr/rls/fs/2005/45105.htm[continue]
"China And Sudan Darfur Crisis " (2007, December 09) Retrieved December 2, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/china-and-sudan-darfur-crisis-33482
"China And Sudan Darfur Crisis " 09 December 2007. Web.2 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/china-and-sudan-darfur-crisis-33482>
"China And Sudan Darfur Crisis ", 09 December 2007, Accessed.2 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/china-and-sudan-darfur-crisis-33482
Sudan Split Grade Course Sudan's existence can be traced back to approximately 9 million years. It is a state in Africa which was formerly conquered by its neighbor; Egypt as well as Turkey. However, rebellion against this ruling regime gave Britain an opportunity to step in. consequently, it was in 1899 when an agreement was signed between Egypt and Britain under which Sudan was to be jointly administered by these two countries.
2). It is clear that the United States looks on this pathetic situation as a place that needs assistance, and the U.S. has provided aid off and on to Sudan through the years of its independence. It may be, Lewis writes, that the U.S. actually did not intervene in any way in the carnage in Darfur until massive international publicity forced America's hand. The 22-year civil war that claimed
Additional countries, such as Argentina, Czech Republic, Chile, Slovak Republic, Spain, Balearic Islands and the Vatican made a Holodomor declaration. Russia continues to be complete denial and is utilizing it political influence to refute that this event ever happened and that it was a deliberate act. In fact, in Russia it has been made illegal to commemorate this event. Stalin's Soviet communist success of relying food as a weapon
Amnesty International (2010) also reports that domestic violence is the major cause of death and disability for women ages 16 to 44 years. Of course, there isn't any forgetting that women in Colombia and Darfur -- places of dangerous armed conflict -- are commonly raped. Amnesty International also notes that the trafficking of women has become a global issue; women are exploited sexually, raped, forced into hard labor and are
interventionism from the perspective of realism vs. idealism. Realism is defined in relationship to states' national interests whereas idealism is defined in relation to the UN's Responsibility to Protect doctrine -- a doctrine heavily influenced by Western rhetoric over the past decade. By addressing the question of interventionism from this standpoint, by way of a case study of Libya and Syria, a picture of the realistic implications of "humanitarian
Intervention of States and Human Rights When and how should States intervene in the affairs of other States with poor human rights records? What threshold of violations has to be corssed first? Who decides when it has been crossed? The sovereignty of states remains paramount and as recognized in the UN Charter. However, other states may surpass the sovereignty clause in cases of gross human rights violations by the host state. For
S., France and publicity, Chad was able to renegotiate more favorable contracts with the Bank, expropriate over $450 million in taxes from the private Consortium firms which they claim they had already paid, under the threat of replacement with Chinese firms. Global oil prices spiked, and Chad cleared over $1 billion in revenues in the last year of the Bank's project in 2008. Much of this increased income coincided at