Complexity Theory Public Sector Research Paper

Download this Research Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Research Paper:

Complexity Theory in the Public Sector

The objective of this work is to examine complexity theory in the public sector. According to Paul Cairney in the work entitled "Complexity Theory in Public Policy" the term complexity "has relevance to a wide range of theories in public policy which describe the replacement of the simple "clubby days' of early post-war politics by complex relationships at multiple levels of government and among a huge politically active population." (2010, p.1) The focus on complexity, according to Cairney (2010) is "indirect and vague." (p.l) It is of the nature that indicates that there should be a shift in analysis "from individuals parts of a political system to the system as a whole; as a network of elements that interact and combine to produce systemic behavior that cannot be broken down into the actions of its constituent parts." (Cairney, 2010, p.1)

Defining Complexity Theory

Complexity theory may be viewed as a manner of thinking and a method used to see the world. (Mittleton-Kelly, 2003, p.26) According to Sanderson (2006) complexity theory developed as a result of what was viewed as being stable. (p.117, paraphrased) Mitchell (2009) as cited in Cairney (2010) held that Complexity Theory represented a "revolutionary break from the reductionist approach to science." (p.2) The approach within Complexity Theory is such that attempts to explain "why complex or system-wide behavior emerges from the interaction between 'large collections of simpler components." (Cairney, 2010, p.3) Cairney (2010) states that "different accounts identify different factors or place more emphasis on some at the expenses of others." ( p.3) Cairney notes that there are variations that make the theory such that identifying the key tenets of the theory is difficult. Cairney states that there are six common assumptions on how complex systems behave and how these systems should be studied including the following assumptions:

(1) A complex system cannot be explained merely by breaking it down into its component parts because a key element of system dynamics is the manner in which those elements interact with each other. Instead, we must shift our analysis to the system as a whole; as networks of elements that interact, share information, adapt, and combine to produce systemic behavior. (Cairney, 2010, p.4)

(2) The behavior of complex systems is difficult to predict. Complex systems exhibit non-linear dynamics produced by feedback loops in which some forms of energy or action are dampened (negative feedback) while others are amplified (positive feedback). As a result, small actions can have large effects and large actions can have small effects. This suggests that periods of equilibrium are also unstable because a small input of energy can have a large effect. This can be linked to the term 'phase transitions', which describes the tipping point at which dramatic change results from the marginal effect of energy (such as when a liquid becomes gas).(Cairney, 2010, p.4)

(3) Complex systems are particularly sensitive to initial conditions which produce a long-term momentum, suggesting that any small measure in initial measurement, or failure to account for the effect of seemingly insignificant factors will produce major errors in predictions of future behavior (the 'butterfly effect'). (Cairney, 2010, p.4)

(4) They exhibit emergence, or behavior that evolves from the interaction between elements at a local level rather than central direction. This makes the system difficult to control. (Cairney, 2010, p.4) They may contain 'strange attractors' or demonstrate extended regularities of behavior (Bovaird, 2008: 320 cited in: (Cairney, 2010, p.4)

(5) They may therefore exhibit periods of 'punctuated equilibria' - in which long periods of stability are interrupted by short bursts of change - such as when new species emerge suddenly in the process of evolution. (Cairney, 2010, p.4)

(6) The various problems that complexity theory seeks to address -- such as predicting climate change, earthquakes, the spread of disease among populations, the processing of DNA within the body, how the brain works, the growth of computer technology and artificial intelligence, and the behavior of social and political systems -- can only be solved by interdisciplinary scientific groups. (Mitchell, 2009 cited in: Cairney, 2010, p.4)

II. Main Strands of Complexity Theory

It is cited in the work of Mitleton-Kelly (2003) that it is necessary to be cautious about the value of complexity theory to the social sciences because human behavior of the capacity to reflect and make deliberative choices and decisions among the alternative paths of action makes the social world a different object of study than the natural or physical world." (Cairney, 2010, p.5) Cairney states that the complexity and public policy literature is comprised by "two main strands" including: (1) a relatively small strand that engages directly with the complexity theory when analyzing public policy; and (2) a much wider range of studies, central to the public policy literature that highlights complex system characteristics without necessarily using the language of complexity." (Cairney, 2010, p.6)

The work of Buuren (nd) entitled "Knowledge Management for Governance" states that recently "a complexity view upon knowledge management is developed in which it has to do with creating the right conditions for knowledge development in situations of non-linearity and self-organization." (Burren, nd, p.4) Centric to this body of knowledge is the "argument that actors (including individuals and organizations) function within a complex and dynamic environment and have to find a sufficient level of adaptability, in order to manage the continuing flows of positive and negative feedback." (p.5) It is necessary that in the management and continuing flows of positive feedback being managed. The three perspectives of knowledge management are listed and described in the following table labeled Figure 1in the present study and which includes the following:

Figure 1

Three Perspectives of Knowledge Management

Source: Burren (nd)

Stated as the reason for the quick development of complexity theory are the following reasons:

(1) Ontological changes: human induced changes in the nature of the real world, proceeding at unprecedented rates and scales and also resulting in growing connectedness and interdependence at many levels;

(2) Epistemological changes: changes in our understanding of the world related to the modern scientific awareness of the behavior of complex systems, including the realization that unpredictability and surprise may be built in the fabric of reality (…);

(3) Changes in the nature of decision-making: in many parts of the world, a more participatory style of decision-making is gaining space, superseding the technocratic and the authoritarian styles. This, together with the widening acceptance of additional criteria, such as the environment, human rights, gender, and others, as well as the emergence of new social actors such as the non-governmental organizations and transnational companies, leads to an increase in the number of dimensions used to define issues, problems, and solutions and hence to higher complexity." (Burren, nd, p.3)

(4) Changes in the nature of decision-making: in many parts of the world, a more participatory style of decision-making is gaining space, superseding the technocratic and the authoritarian styles. This, together with the widening acceptance of additional criteria, such as the environment, human rights, gender, and others, as well as the emergence of new social actors such as the non-governmental organizations and transnational companies, leads to an increase in the number of dimensions used to define issues, problems, and solutions and hence to higher complexity." (Burren, nd, p.4)

Burren writes that the notion of complexity "is frequently linked with the notion of coevolution. When our environment is continuously changing, as a consequence of others and our acts, we can only survive in such an environment by seeking a sufficient level of fitness." (Burren, nd, p.5) In other words, it becomes necessary to adapt to the environmental conditions and to maintain a level of uniqueness that sufficiently delivers added value to the environment. (, paraphrased) Complexity theory study may provide contributions to the understanding of strategic management in public organizations as managers are able to bring about a reduction in risks for new initiatives through strategic alliances and their existing skills can be patched "into new combinations." (Agaard, nd, p.3) Complexity, according to Burren (nd) is of the nature that: "…generally exhibit a number of attributes that make them more difficult to understand and manage than simple and complicated systems' (Gallopin 2001: 225 cited in Burrren, nd, p.4) The important characteristics of complex phenomenon are described in the work of Burren as follows:

(1) Multiplicity of legitimate perspectives (reality is ambiguous: there are more, valid interpretations possible. Attention for this diversity in perspectives and interests of different stakeholders is needed);

(2) Non-linearity (relations in a systems are not linear. A given action can lead to several possible outcomes, some of which are disproportionate in size to the action itself. Through multiple interactions, organizations are capable of many responses that are complex and unpredictable, leading to many outcomes);

(3) Emergence and self-organization (novel patterns of order can spontaneously emerge from the interactions between the elements of the system);

(4) Multiplicity of scales and interconnectivity (many complex systems are hierarchic: systems are both subsystem and supra-system; all parts are connected and…[continue]

Cite This Research Paper:

"Complexity Theory Public Sector" (2011, May 06) Retrieved October 26, 2016, from

"Complexity Theory Public Sector" 06 May 2011. Web.26 October. 2016. <>

"Complexity Theory Public Sector", 06 May 2011, Accessed.26 October. 2016,

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Public Sector Comparator in PPP

    If, on the other hand, the net present value of the public sector comparator is lower than the net present value of the public-private partnership, then the PPP is too expensive and ineffective and it does not represent the adequate solution for the provision of the public service (Grimsey and Lewis, 2007). The public sector comparator identifies the value of money for the project in the case in which it

  • Public Sector Management the Term

    It relies on the vision of the state you choose to subscribe and it depends upon the costs and benefits of a few highly imperfect social institutions: market trends and the public sector. (Bovaird, Loffler, 2003, p. 25) The public sector is a ubiquitous social institution having grown in size and complexity within the last fifty years. Nevertheless, this is a linear development. Whereas the development belonging to the

  • Organizational Change in the Public Sector This

    Organizational Change in the Public Sector This research proposal explores the feasibility of management in the public Sector as an organizational paradigm and new model in organizational development. The literature review reviews numerous journal articles that explore on the key concepts of change management strategies from a public sector project management perspective. The authors suggest that employee's participation, effective feedback across the board, and empowerment of subordinate staffs is a major

  • Management Account in the Public Sector and

    Management Account in the Public Sector and Management Accounting in the Private Sector: A Comparative Review The late 20th and early 21st centuries have brought increasing change to almost every country in the world, Australia included. Globalism describes, in fact, the increasing unification of the world through economic means (reduction of trade barriers, support of international trade, and mitigation of export and import quotas). They goal for globalization is to increase

  • Accountability in the Public Sector

    , although more governments are including citizen satisfaction survey results to address the lack-of-quality-indicators criticism. Ultimately, the article's key findings can be summarized in the four lessons learned from the states that the authors provide: (1) the importance of working proactively to identify roles and responsibilities; (2) the importance of committed leadership; (3) the importance of balancing political, managerial and performance measurement accountability; and (4) The importance of clarity and

  • Australian Public Sector Internal Report

    Notes On Public Sector Reform and Performance Managementa Australia 1997. Sector Management Act Review Report, viewed 2 October 2005.] Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) 2001, Publlic sector leadership for the 21st Century, OECD, Paris. Pollitt, C 2003, The essential public manager, Open University Press, Maidenhead. Shergold, Peter 2004, Australian Public Sector Governance: Speech at CCH Manual Launch. Viewed 2 October 2005. Sethi, D 1999, 'leading from the middle', Human Resource

  • Public Accounting Corporate Accounting and

    This role is in response to clients' demands for a single trustworthy individual or firm to meet all of their financial needs. However, accountants are restricted from providing these services to clients whose financial statements they also prepare." (U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2009) 1. Public Accounting The work entitled: "The Reality of the CPA's Role" states that modern CPAs work "behind the scenes as trusted advisors in

Read Full Research Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved