Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from essay:
Considering that the old order in Ireland was in place since two millennia and had always been under the control of the Gaelic chieftains, their removal from the leadership of the provinces of Ireland by the English Crown was destined to arise the resistance of the majority who sought support in the Catholic world and especially hoped in the papal authority. Curtis points out that the resistance against the protestant faith that built up after Elisabeth took over Munster and Ulster was coming not only from inside the respective Irish provinces, but also from the dissidents in Italy, Portugal, Spain and the Low countries. On one hand they were gathering in the spirit of preserving the old faith, on the other, the Irish and the Anglo-Irish who opposed the Reformation were changing their ways supported by the Jesuits who helping the process of transforming the faithful into fanatics. On the other side, the Protestants represented by the English installed as bishops, for example, although as zealous as their opponents, were unable to understand them since they were not interested in understanding their language and customs.
The roots of the conflict between the Protestants and the Catholics in Ireland spread in all directions and they will always look as a map of intersecting roads. As previously shown, the clash between the old and new world that agitated the whole Europe was paralleled by the conflict between a world that was two millennia old and a new order that was imposed by means that were questionable in their essence. The new deputies and clerics, appointed by the English crown were unable to understand the problematic of the local aspects and the spirit of the Gaelic world remained mostly strange to them. The old method of subjugating a nation, religion, worked poorly in the case of Ireland's subjugation to the Crown: "Religion, Land, and local Lordship were to be the great trio of Irish wrongs. Many who remained attached to the Queen as sovereign resented English methods and hated the new English settlers and officials; this was the spirit of the Lords of the Pale. It is one which has been common even with the most loyal of the Anglo-Irish in later times, and is one of the hardest things for Englishmen to understand" (Curtis 2002, 176). The question of loyalty to the English monarchy vs. rejection of the forced English ways upon a foreign body might find an un answer in the lack of knowledge of the local character. The English settlers and the leaders representing the English monarchy were incapable to grasp the specifics and therefore unable to take the best decisions in implementing the measures and the laws required by the Reformation.
The conflict between Protestants and Catholics that arouse in Ireland during the Tudor dynasty and was particularly fueled during Elizabethan times did not find a peaceful solution for the next centuries. The religious remained strictly tied to the nationalistic manifestations and was used as an expression of the ideal of freedom. In 1613, after having considered the situation in Ireland as a representative of the English monarchy, Charles Cornwallis expressed his conviction that the solution to coming to peace with Ireland is to end the war between Protestants and Catholics by forcing the protestant religion upon its inhabitants without exception. This way of thinking ahs changed eve since and modern theories of international relations and politics have proved that religion will always be one's best ally and also worst enemy. In the case of the Union between England and Ireland, a union between a Protestant and a Catholic country never ceased to bring controversies, rebellions and a general state of insecurity. Among the instruments used by the English government in Ireland, there was the penal law that was destined to assure the leading places for the clerics of the Protestant faith and the settlement of the English brought into the country in order to counterbalance the Irish and the Anglo-Irish. "Generally speaking, though the penal legislation was enacted during the sixteenth century, it was not until the early seventeenth century that it was enforced, or, to be more precise, that the Dublin government and the state Church was finally in a position to try to enforce it across the whole island of Ireland" (Boran, Gribben 2006, 95).
In the case of the reign of James I, as in those of his predecessors, the political victory was followed by the attempt to enforce the Protestant religion upon the conquered. But, like in the past, those who were involved in the process, representatives of the English Crown and the locals who were faithful to the monarch were lacking enthusiasm in their enterprise for various reasons. The penal law as a solution of forcing the changing of the Catholic faith into Protestant failed in Ireland and after several failed attempts, the king finally decided to give up on such measures. Nevertheless, interdictions of all sorts were imposed to those who refused to conform to the new religion in different parts of the island: "the government sought to prevent Catholics educating their children abroad, juries who refused fellow-Catholics of recusancy were fined; legal action was also taken against recusant corporations, mayors and local government officials; the oath of supremacy was used to bar Catholics from positions of power and influence…Catholic lawyers were excluded from he courts; Episcopal excommunication was used against Catholics; and in 1612, the government executed two Catholic Priests for treason" (idem, 97).
Aside from the common faithful who were fighting for the religion they inherited from their parents, the fight between the Protestants and the Catholics that started during the reign of Charles VIII and continued under Elisabeth I and thereafter was fueled by the constant fight between the two rival churches and the constant fear of loosing power through the loss of control over the population. The secular and ecclesiastical leadership on both sides were unable to come to terms in Ireland, no matter how the political situation turned out to be. The English were never willing to neglect the island that they considered a gate to the heart of the Kingdom for the enemy powers and the struggle for power and control mismanaged and misunderstood fueled a constant fight between the two faiths.
Richey, Alexander George and Kane Robert Romney. A Short History of the Irish People: Down to the Date of the Plantation of Ulster. Harvard University. Hodges, Figgis and co., 1887
Boran, Elizabethanne and Gribben Crawford. Enforcing Reformation…[continue]
"Conflict Between Protestants And Catholics" (2009, May 13) Retrieved October 21, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/conflict-between-protestants-and-catholics-21897
"Conflict Between Protestants And Catholics" 13 May 2009. Web.21 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/conflict-between-protestants-and-catholics-21897>
"Conflict Between Protestants And Catholics", 13 May 2009, Accessed.21 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/conflict-between-protestants-and-catholics-21897
This is because they agreed with these beliefs and felt that Ireland should remain a part of England. ("Irish," 2009) (Cotrell, 2006) (Sachar, 2011) While the Catholics, wanted a nation that was free of English rule and did not have any connections to the Crown. This was dominated by state supported religion that was following the practices established by St. Patrick. These divisions are illustrating the differences between the two
Catholic church and public policy have remarked that the members of American clergy in general, without even excepting those who do not admit religious liberty, are all in favour of civil freedom; but they do not support any particular political system. They keep aloof from parties, and from public affairs. In the United States religion exercises but little influence upon laws, and upon the details of public opinion; but it
However, certain elements of traditional Christian theology are centered on Mary, and the degree of emphasis that those elements receive can be very telling about Mary's actual role in the religion. For example, the connection between female chastity and religious observance seems to have been established by God's choice of a Virgin to carry his son. God did not have to choose a virgin to bear his child, but
The European actions against the natives were in error, because they were committed by Protestant Christians, who, unlike Catholics or savages, should have known better and responded with higher forms of faith and feeling. The Indian atrocities were seen as inevitable, the result of "undesigned provocation" (even though Wesley acknowledges that the settlers are interlopers) rather than a response in defense of their land (Ward, 1872). Thus, although the First
Cause of Armed Conflict In the aftermath of 911 and as an effect of the 'War on Terror', religion can be clearly seen as major cause of armed conflict. Such views, however, have fallen on fertile ground, following the massive debates about Samuel P. Huntington's clash of civilizations thesis, and the increased analytical attention to the interface between religion and conflict throughout most of the 1990s. Although few analysts will argue
Children in Conflict by Morris Fraser Morris Fraser, a child psychiatrist in Belfast, describes the effects of the 'troubles' on children growing up in Northern Ireland in Children in Conflict. While the book offers valuable insights for the behavioral sciences of psychology and sociology as a whole, it also succeeds in establishing the manner in which society can, consciously and unconsciously, end up perpetuating an existing social problem. In particular, Fraser
Any one who tried to gain enough power and wealth would be considered a threat to the power of the church and was therefore quickly deposed of their wealth. Weber proposed that even though Catholics tolerated a greater display of outward wealth, Protestant doctrines asked the followers to concentrate on mundane pursuits. It also asks its followers to accept a lower station in life without a hierarchical structure to force