Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company
Continental Illinois National Bank
"Too Big to Fail"
The purpose of this work is to show whether or not Continental Illinois rescue and restructuring successful and if so why it was successful. Further using hindsight and consideration of Professor Kaufman's report, this work will attempt to discover if the decision to restructure was justified and explain why or why not. Furthermore, this work will attempt to discover to what extent did the OCC contribute to the management failing of Chairman and CEO, Mr. Roger E. Anderson & the management team of Continental Illinois and what short- and long-term benefits were expected to raise from appointing David Taylor as the new CEO and Edward Bottum as President in the run-up to the restructuring of Continental Illinois. Finally the current status of Continental Illinois will be examined, the main sectors of banking and how these sectors have changed since the collapse of Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company.
Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company was a large successful bank that was considered to be 'too big to fail.' Nevertheless, Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust was rescued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Company (FDIC) after several runs on the bank's deposits in order to avoid the risk of collapse and along with it the collapse of confidence in the banking system in the United States. Professor G. Kaufman questioned in 1995 whether there was justification in the rescue of Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company arguing that the bank should have been allowed to collapse. Professor Kaufman's opinion was that the only justification for the rescue was if the Office of the Comptroller believed that virtually no assets at all would have been otherwise recovered. As it were 97% of the assets were recovered.
Called the 'most significant bank failure resolution in the history of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company (Continental) was provided with interim financial assistance by the FDIC on the date of May 17, 1984 as well as receiving financial assistance of a permanent nature in September of the same year.
Background and Overview of Continental
Continental is a subsidiary of Continental Illinois Corporation (CIC) an organization that has been in existence for over 124 years. Continental was an institution that prior to 1984 was 'striving for growth'. The bank had previously received assistance during 1933 due to over-investment in loans for utilities as well as out-or-territory lending. Development of international operations on an extensive basis, establishment of internal divisions for rendering of specialized services for the oil, utility and finance company customers as well as the development of a department for separate real estate loans for home and commercial loans. In 1982 the bank peaked ranking sixth among the multi-national banking organizations as well as being the leader among domestic, commercial and industrial lenders.
Continental employed over 12,000 and held the approximate amount of $40 billion in assets. In May of 1984, at the time of near collapse the company had office in 14 states as well as 29 foreign countries with offices numbering 57. During the years 1976 and 1981 CCI experienced a jump in lending from $5 billion to over $14 billion with the company's total assets increasing from $21.5 billion to $45 billion with the loans-to-assets ration increasing from 57.9% to 68.8% between 1977 and 1981. The organizations return on assets stayed at 0.5% during the same time span and the return on equity was approximately 14.4% during those same years. (FDIC, 1997) The problems came under notice during 1982 when the Penn Square Bank, N.A. In Okalahoma City closed. The loans were underwritten poorly and it was clear that Continental had not used due diligence on the purchasing of the loans as well as Continental's loan portfolio beginning to experience problems specifically in the energy sector. It was reported by Continental in the second quarter of 1982 an amount of $1.3 billion in loans and assets that were 'nonperforming'.
By May 15 the FDIC had a meeting with the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to explore various alternatives for the situation with Continental whose insured deposit accounts equaled $3 billion and its uninsured deposit accounts and claims of creditors equaled more than $30 billion. Risk involved in the potential failure of Continental were extended far beyond the bank including a potential liquidity crisis for other banks with significant foreign deposits as well as a decrease in confidence in U.S. institutions of foreign investors. Severe damage to the depositor banks that were unaffiliated was a possibility as well as a negative effect on financial markets. Furthermore there were smaller banks with correspondent bank accounts and federal funds that were sold to Continental whose funds would be at risk should Continental fail. Continental also had lawsuits and other troubled loans to consider. The FDIC decided to continue funding Continental at the discount window of the Federal Reserve and the OCC.
The reliance of Continental on the Eurodollar market for funding along with the condition and earnings made the bank vulnerable to the bank run in May 1984. Stated in the work "Continental Illinois and Too Big to Fail" is that, "In an effort to calm the situation, the Comptroller of the Currency, departing from the OCC' policy of not commenting on individual banks, took the extraordinary step of issuing a statement denying the agency had sought assistance for Continental and noting that the OCC was unaware .of any significant changes in the bank's operations, as reflected in its published financial statements, that would serve as the basis. For rumors about Continental." Reportedly a House Banking Subcommittee report in 1985 "expressed reservations about both the OCC' and the Federal Reserves' supervision of Continental" stating that the OCC had not taken a decisive action in order to slow down the growth of the bank or to increase the bank's equity-to-assets ratio before 1983. Furthermore there had been failure before 1982 to require Continental to remedy known problems in its loan management system. Further stated was the even though OCC was aware of the growth of concentration in oil and gas on the part of Continental that the OCC did not "consistently and forcefully. point out potential dangers to management, and that OCC examination reports in general were too ambiguous to provide a clear message to the bank about its problems." Finally it was stated that the OCC's sampling technique for loan evaluation was also thought to be insufficient in the case of Continental because it relied too much on the banks own internal controls, which in this case were themselves woefully deficient." This very likely contributed to the failure of management and Chairman and CEO Roger E. Anderson in the time of trouble for Continental Bank. (Continental National Bank & Trust Company, 1984)
The interim assistance contained the following components:
The FDIC issued an explicit guarantee that all depositors (insured and uninsured) and other general creditors of Continental would be fully protected and that service to the bank's customers would not be interrupted in any subsequent resolution. The FDIC asked a group of seven commercial banks to provide a $2 billion interim capital infusion through a subordinated note purchase. Four years earlier, 27 large commercial banks had participated in the assistance provided to First Penn to demonstrate the banking community's faith in the bank's recovery. Therefore, seven of the nation's largest banks agreed to share equally in $500 million of the $2 billion interim capital infusion.
The FDIC provided the remaining $1.5 billion in subordinated debt. Continental accepted FDIC restrictions related to hiring, replacement, or removal of members of senior management and of Continental's board of directors, as well as to general control of the bank. CIC, Continental's holding company, guaranteed that under certain circumstances assets in the holding company would be used to repay the FDIC.
To further augment the financial resources available to Continental, a group of 24 major U.S. banks agreed to provide more than $5.5 billion in funding on an unsecured basis throughout the period during which a permanent solution was developed. The agreement was arranged between Continental and the group of commercial banks for which Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York acted as agent. Without the FDIC's explicit guarantee to depositors and general creditors of Continental, that line of credit likely would not have been available.
Because there was no partner to merge with the bank as well as a deposit payoff being undesirable, open bank assistance was judged to be the only solution that was viable in respect to the Continental problem. The issues that needed resolution were:
Problem loans had to be removed from the bank to stem its losses;
Provisions had to be made for funding the bank's operations, including arrangements necessary for its future borrowing from the Federal Reserve;
The bank's capital had to be increased; and Continental had to strengthen its management…[continue]
"Continental Illinois National Bank And Trust Company Too Big To Fail" (2005, February 19) Retrieved October 25, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/continental-illinois-national-bank-and-trust-62459
"Continental Illinois National Bank And Trust Company Too Big To Fail" 19 February 2005. Web.25 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/continental-illinois-national-bank-and-trust-62459>
"Continental Illinois National Bank And Trust Company Too Big To Fail", 19 February 2005, Accessed.25 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/continental-illinois-national-bank-and-trust-62459
Disrupting America's economic system is a fundamental objective of terrorists Even as the world continues to struggle with the terrible shock from the September 11 attacks in New York and Washington, one principle lesson has already become clear: disrupting our economic system is a fundamental objective of terrorists. Prior to September 11, our economic environment was certainly not immune to terror, in comparison to many other nations; we lived relatively terror-free. Now,
Enron could engage in their derivative trading strategy with no fear of government intervention because derivative trading was specifically exempted from government regulation. Due in part to a ruling by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) chairwoman, Wendy Graham, derivatives remained free of regulatory oversight. Ms. Graham, wife of Texas senator Phil Graham, made this ruling 5 weeks before resigning as chairwoman of the CFTC and joining the Enron Board
The growth of Internet has led to a desire to understand the characteristics of the users, their reasons for using the service and what the users do when connected. A huge and expanding 'Internet watching' industry has progressed to provide such data. Some statistics can be collected directly from the Internet about traffic volumes and the geographical segmentation of its users and these provide a reasonably accurate picture of
Managing All Stakeholders in the Context of a Merger Process Review of the Relevant Literature Types of Mergers Identifying All Stakeholders in a Given Business Strategic Market Factors Driving Merger Activity Selection Process for Merger Candidates Summary, Conclusion, and Recommendations The Challenge of Managing All Stakeholders in the Context of a Merger Process Mergers and acquisitions became central features of organizational life in the last part of the 20th century, particularly as organizations seek to establish and
International Business 5 Pertinent Topics The Cultural Effect on International Business Description Political Issues Affecting International Business Description Regional Economic Integration AND INTERNATIONAL Business Description Impact of Exchange Rates on International Business Description Corporate Strategy in International Business Description An Analysis of International Business Today No one can dispute the fact that the world economy is increasingly globalizing as we move into the 21st century. As this internationalization of business grows, there is an increasing challenge being faced to deal with cultural