Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
Patterns Juvenile Delinquency Throughout the World/How Determine Who Juvenile?
Patterns in juvenile delinquency also vary throughout the world, as do the way countries define "delinquency" among juveniles. The Japanese according to Platt (2005) have taken on a much more philosophical approach to juvenile delinquency, supporting a Confucian style structure of education and support, one that works toward educating children to become part of the larger social collective (p. 965). In this environment, children are encouraged to become more socially aware and to self-regulate, often given the opportunity to reform before they are punished for wrongdoings.
This conflicts sharply with juvenile delinquency programs and structures elsewhere in the world. In Australia, juvenile delinquency is often associated with being a member of a juvenile gang, which is defined as "youth hanging out on the streets with gang activity" or street activity that has the potential to lead to mischievous behaviors (Duffy & Gillig, 2004, p. 2). Illegal activity is addressed when territorial behaviors are engaged in, whether or not juveniles act criminally in many cases (Duffy & Gillig, 2004). In Brazil, juvenile delinquency is seen as more common, and associated with children "of the streets" which comprise primarily homeless children who authorities state often engage in crime "to survive" thus are much different according to Brazilian authorities, who promote privatization of policing, than the "street gangs of Chicago or Los Angeles" (Duffy & Gillig, 2004, p. 3).
In the United States, there is more often a mixture of males and females associated with gangs than in other countries, where more commonly male juveniles from ages 12 to 24 may be associated with "juvenile" type crimes (Duffy & Gillig, 2004). This compared with the United States, where typically a child is considered a "juvenile" and subject to imprisonment in juvenile detention centers, rehabilitative centers and subject to more lenient and rehabilitative sentencing to the age of 17 or 17 (Duffy & Gillig, 2004) except in cases involving malevolent crimes, such as homicide or crimes with proven malicious intent, including rape (Duffy & Gillig, 2004; Keynes, 1996).
Globally there is universal acceptance that adolescents regardless of their age are more likely to engage in violent or serious crimes if they affiliate with gangs, and are more likely in these instances to be addressed or punished severely, in the United States and abroad (Duffy & Gillig, 2004). There is little tolerance in the United States for juvenile activities involving gun violence and involvement in drug related activities, including sales or use, which may result in harsher penalties and sentencing (Duffy & Gillig, 2004).
How do these perceptions toward juvenile delinquency affect rates of juvenile delinquency throughout the world? Studies suggest similarities in drug-related juvenile crimes globally, as they do gang-related crimes; the rates of non-violent crimes however are often less in countries where more attention is given to education and schooling, as in Japan, or in Brazil, where privatization discourages many youths from engaging in criminal or juvenile activity, with the exception of those poverty stricken, who as mentioned are often forced to engage in crime to sustain life or find food etc. (Duffy & Gillig, 2004). On reviewing the literature the greatest deterrent to juvenile crime appears to be adequate support, from community and from family; rehabilitation is also an important component, but may not be necessary if community support and parental guidance is stronger at the beginning and throughout one's adolescent years, as studies consistently confirm criminal activity in youths is often linked to parental dysfunction and lack of support from authoritative figures (Duffy & Gillig, 2004; Keynes, 1996).
Duffy, M.P. & Gillig, S. (2004). Teen gangs: A global view. Westport: Greenwood Press.
ICMBA. (2007). American Legal System. Internet Center for Management and Business
Administration, Inc. QuickMBA.com. Retrieved 22, May, 2007:
Keynes, E. (1996). Liberty, property, and property: Toward a jurisprudence of substantive due process. University Park: Penn State University Press.
Kubasek, N.K., Brennan, B.A. & Browne, N.M. (2006). The legal environment of business: A critical thinking approach. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Pizzi, W.T. (1996) Punishment and procedure: A different view of the…[continue]
"Criminal Justice Substantive Vs Procedural" (2007, May 22) Retrieved December 11, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminal-justice-substantive-vs-procedural-37597
"Criminal Justice Substantive Vs Procedural" 22 May 2007. Web.11 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminal-justice-substantive-vs-procedural-37597>
"Criminal Justice Substantive Vs Procedural", 22 May 2007, Accessed.11 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminal-justice-substantive-vs-procedural-37597
In 2002 the crime lab in the state of Mississippi found that the semen in the victim's body belonged to two different men and neither of them was Kennedy Brewer. Balko concludes by stating: "Forensic scandals have been troublingly common of late, with phony experts, fake results, and incompetent testing recently uncovered in Virginia, Maryland, Kansas, Illinois, and Texas, to name just a few. Courts need to take a
In 1993 there were 155,704 recorded crimes of burglary and of these 20,200 were residential burglaries. Since the mid-1970s the level of recorded burglaries has fluctuated around a level of 130,000 to 150,000 crimes per year although during the three last years, 1991 to 1993, the level has been close to 155,000. The number of recorded car thefts in 1993 was 61,141 and of these 18,300 were attempts. During
criminal justice. Each question must be 300 words long. Identify the requirements for the insanity plea in your jurisdiction and contrast this with the M'Naghten standard, the Brawner standard, ALI standard, and the Durham rule. Identify similarities and differences. Support you response with examples from your research and reading assignment. In the 1843 case of the United Kingdom House of Lords Decisions of Daniel M'Naghten's, the court determined that an insanity
Death Chamber Indeed, the death penalty is one of the most divisive issues in the entirety of the criminal justice system as it currently exists within the United States of America. Although many polls do suggest that a majority of Americans ultimately do support the employment of the death penalty, it faces stern and strong opposition from a violent minority that radically opposes the death penalty for a variety of reasons,
law in England are: common law, statute law, subordinate legislation, custom, and European community law. Common law: This is the cannon of law applying to the general swathes of law that are decided by the judges and adapted to changing times. Judges make its rules over the years that have relied on precedents of other cases and adapted preceding rulings to suit the circumstances of the present instance. Each new
" (Griffin and Evans, 2002) a wider vision of international law, according to Griffin and Evans is one that views adhering to laws that are international as an obligation "to the extent of mandating each arm of government to promote compliance with international law." (2002) This position is justified firstly, through holding that international law "is law, and it produces binding, legal obligations on Australia. Hence international law should be
It is the premeditated and cold-blooded killing of a human being by the state. This cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment is done in the name of justice. It violates the right to life as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Amnesty International opposes the death penalty in all cases without exception regardless of the nature of the crime, the characteristics of the offender, or the method used