Adam Bedau and Paul G. Cassell (2004) reference the cost of the death penalty in the State of Texas, which is also a state with the highest numbers of executions under the death penalty. Bedau and Cassell cite information that says the initial trial of a death penalty case, that is a case where the death penalty is a penalty option, is approximately two million dollars per case more than those cases that do not involve the death penalty in Texas (101). These costs, though specific to Texas, are reasonably no less expensive for other states that try cases where there is an imposable death penalty.
If the difference for the states is about room, the total number of people on death row at a given time is insignificant as compared to the overall prison population. It would hardly seem that a prison with as many fourteen people on death row might be causing prison overcrowding if the death penalty were eliminated. Additionally, if we save two million dollars per death penalty case by not imposing the death penalty, then there is certainly enough money saved to build extra prison lifetime incarceration housing units.
Brian W. Kappler (2000) raised questions about individual states, electing to keep the death penalty, but to circumvent the length of time, and, therefore, the cost of maintaining death row prisoners, but reducing the number of appeals and reinventing the appeal process for death row inmates (467). This has created a number of cases to be heard by, or that have been heard by the Supreme Court for violations of Habeas Corpus (467). The processes for establishing a shortened route to the death penalty is no doubt...
That the states would reinvent the argument for Habeas Corpus, which is important and an essential legal right to all people coming before the judicial system for any reason; is almost more frightening than the death penalty. You must, however, give states like Arizona credit for trying please its voters with the death penalty, and a low cost execution (467).
The cost of the death penalty is such that, according to some sources, is enough to house 1.5 times the prison population by the time an execution takes place. The housing of just the people on death row alone could save the states millions of dollars, and, given the likelihood of natural death which would cause the people on death row to die around the average of 70 years of age, the savings alone is worth it.
It would be great to see, even if we do not eliminate the death penalty, thus saving the taxpayers millions more in current, future, and ongoing death penalty arguments; if the states would simply not impose it - it could be there for some case that was so significant - like trying the anti-Christ - that it would make the cost and execution one worth investing in.
Works Cited
Bedeau, Adam and Cassell, Paul G., Debating the Death Penalty, Oxford University Press, (2004).
A www.questiaschool.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5001761330
Kappler, Burke W. "Small Favors: Chapter 154 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, the States, and the Right to Counsel." Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 90.2 (2000): 467. Questia. 15 Dec. 2008 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5001761330.
Patterson, Krista L. "Acculturation and the Development of Death Penalty Doctrine in the United States." Duke Law Journal 55.6 (2006): 1217+. Questia. 15 Dec. 2008 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5018256017.
Death Penalty All indications are that capital offenses are on the rise and the response to this phenomenon has been a cry to impose capital punishment as retribution. Certainly the issue is one of the most hotly debated in the world today; both for consideration of its humaneness as well as efficacy as a deterrent. For the purposes of this assignment we will examine the issue from both sides with the
Capital Punishment Currently, 38 states have legalized capital punishment statutes. In most states, the reinstatements of the death penalty were a response to public outcry over the perceived increase of violent crimes. There are now more than 3,000 people on death row, and more are being convicted each year. Despite this legalized status, a vocal group of opponents have raised questions regarding the constitutionality, fairness and effectiveness of capital punishment. This paper
Opponents also provide evidence that the death penalty is unjust. Data show that death row prisoners are disproportionately low income, minority, and under-represented by the legal system. Thus, we many wonder if those who can't afford the best lawyers are more likely to be sentenced to death, and if so, then we may have effectively put a price on the life of a criminal. Similarly, if the flawed legal system
The study also made an assessment of the 14 countries who eradicated the capital punishment. Murder went up by 7% from five years prior to the abolition period to five years following the abolition claimed by the study. Besides, researches were conducted by Prof. Issac Erlich from the years 1933 to 1969. He came to the conclusion that "An added execution per year might bring down the number of
Death Penalty for Juvenile Offenders Supreme Court by a majority decision on March 1, 2005 in Roper v. Simmons held that death penalty for juveniles was "cruel and unusual" and as such the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution forbid the execution of offenders who were under the age of 18 when their crimes were committed. The action reversed the death sentences of 72 convicted murderers in the U.S.
Death Penalty is the most severe forms of punishment that can be accorded to a criminal who has committed a crime and deserves to be punished. The brief history of death penalty shows that this is nothing new, because it was something that was practiced right from the eighteenth century BC, in Babylon, and thereafter in Athens, and in Rome, and in Great Britain. The death penalty methods of punishments