Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
Former Enron employees reported that important documents continued to be shredded despite federal subpoenas and court orders, which prohibited the practice. The employees' condition was so severe that the word "enron" was coined to mean getting victimized or wronged by the company or boss. An "enronian" came to mean an employee or investor who suffers from corporate scandal or corruption through no fault of his or her own. It means going to work on a particular day and getting informed by the manager that the company was out of business and that one's service was no longer needed. It meant receiving the bad news without warning and with no severance pay (Wikipedia, Cable News Network).
Displaced Enron employees stood to learn from their experience that working for a large and seemingly stable company, which promises a lot of incentives and benefits and offers security, is not an assurance that it will deliver what it promises or offers. The larger the company, the greater the expenses it makes in order to survive or stay on top. Employees need to realize that their company has other loyalties to sustain. Enron had political ties to sustain and these ties needed large sums of money. Enron was embroiled in rumors of bribery and political pressure to secure contracts in Central America, South America, Africa and the Philippines. Special mention should be made about the controversial $3 billion contract with the Maharashtra State Electricity Board in India where Enron officials were rumored to have resorted to political connections within the Clinton and then Brush administrators to pressure the board.
These employees could have done something different if they were given the chance to, but they could not be given that chance. If they knew completely and exactly how their invested labors were going, they could have taken legal action to protect their interest. But management would not let them know. Management could only either apply optimism that it could solve its problems or simply justify what it was doing to make the organization survive, although management executives and officials would not guess what to do when they reached their limits.
But there were employees from the Enron ranks who should have known or recognized the impending collapse and taken some steps based on their knowledge to save the employees. These were those on the higher ranks and had access to confidential information or knew what the bosses were doing. But these trusted employees chose to leave the fate of lower-level employees into the hands of these executives and officials. They did not give these lesser employees the choice to do something for themselves and their interest. It was all a matter of a moral sense of responsibility on their part, which could not be entirely evaluated and tried in a court of law.
The collapse of Enron led to the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of July 30, 2002 (Wikipedia 2006). It provides stronger penalties for fraud and requires public companies to avoid making loans to management, to report more information to the public, to maintain stronger independence from auditors, and to report on have financial control procedures audited. The law established governance reforms on th New York Stock Exchange and became the most consequential reorientation of corporate behavior in American history (Wikipedia).
Former employees and investors of Enron can pass on the wisdom of their experience to present and would-be employees and investors of other companies to prevent a repeat. They can insist that a strong labor union be established, if there is none yet. They can bargain for the inclusion of safety measures, which would render management financial statements really transparent and oblige management to inform them about the true state of the organization on a regular basis, short of a participative nature of power-sharing. They can also initiate a move to urge Congress to pass legislations securing their positions and interests, especially in very big companies. The labor sector should continuously lobby for its interests in both Houses in response to these developments and in preparation for probable problems linked to these developments. They can learn from the fate of former Enron executive J. Cliff Baxter, who committed suicide because of the scandal (Hanson 2002).
1. Cable News Network. (2002). FBI Talks to Enron Employees. AOL Time Warner Company. http://www.search.yahoo.com/search?ei=UTF-8&p=Enron+employees&fr=slv1-&b=11
2. Hanson, E. (2002). Attorney General Orders Release of Ex-Enron Executive's Suicide Note. Houston Chronicle. http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl./special/enron/1361816.html
3. Wikipedia. (2006). Enron…[continue]
"Enron Employees Enron Corporation Is" (2006, August 15) Retrieved December 9, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/enron-employees-corporation-is-71394
"Enron Employees Enron Corporation Is" 15 August 2006. Web.9 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/enron-employees-corporation-is-71394>
"Enron Employees Enron Corporation Is", 15 August 2006, Accessed.9 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/enron-employees-corporation-is-71394
Enron Leadership Enron collapsed very quickly in November 2001, and its failure should have been a warning to serious dysfunctions in the entire corporate and financial system, but this did not happen. Its executives admitted that they had falsified its records going back for at least five years, although in reality they had been doing so since the 1980s. When the company filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy it laid off over 20,000
Enron (Movie) analysis The Smartest Guys in the Room-Enron The film is pitched around the America's seventh largest corporation that was in charge of distributing electricity and natural gas. The company was worth over 70 billion dollars in assets built over years with over 22,000 employees, it became bankrupt within 24 days. The employees lost their jobs and medical insurance, 1.2 billion in retirement benefits while the retirees lost 2 billion dollars
THE PEOPLE BEHIND THE RISE AND FALL OF ENRON Kenneth Lay being one of the pioneers of Enron from its establishment in 1986, had lead the way of Enron's emergence as one of the leading company in the U.S. And eventually to its collapse and declaration of bankruptcy on December 2001. Kenneth Lay held the position as the CEO and chairman of Enron from 1986 to January 23, 2002. Lay is
Enron Scandal: Who was Responsible and Why? Background of Enron Scandal and Timeline of Events Key Players in Enron Scandal The Enron Scandal was the biggest accounting fraud in U.S., indeed worldwide, business history. The following paper gives a brief history of the events leading up to the scandal, a timeline for the events surrounding the uncovering of the scandal and the events following the public knowledge of the scandal. Key players in
Enron was a Texas based, low profile, gas pipeline Company that progressed from delivering energy to brokering energy futures. Exploiting de-regulation, it pioneered an innovative mark- to- market pricing strategy and started selling electricity in 1995, entering the European energy market in 1995. Enron broke new ground by buying, selling and hedging electricity against market risk just like shares and bonds. In 1999 Enron entered the hi-tech, Internet bandwidth market buying
Disregarding its Ethical Code. Enron had its own set of Ethical Code, but it became redundant because the top managers at the company hardly paid any heed to it. The corporate culture at the company was focused on making "deals" and increasing Enron's share value, while the "outdated, theoretical concept of ethics and morality" was kept on the back-burner. Enron's 'ethics' was personified by Kenneth Lay's exercising of his stock options
From all facts and appearances, those Enron executives gave lip service to ethics, then went on their own way, making as much profit as they could while the company teetered on collapse. One final example from Enron's "Code of Ethics" is titled "Twenty-Twenty Hindsight" which carries its own irony without delving into its points. Lay writes on page 10 that if any employees' security activities or transactions "become the subject