Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
As opposite, in private sector accounting (for the purpose to improve the financial position of the company) the sales are recognized when the products or services have been rendered and the payment has been received or is expected to be received in a very short time. The costs are recognized as deduction from income if there is a subjective view that these costs are to lead to future income generation in the coming periods. Usage of accrual accounting is considered an advantage for public firms as balancing expenses and income is a good controlling and performance measure. On the other hand, in public sector, the income for the company does not depend on the performance of the management, nor does the expenditures are not a function of beneficiaries actions, accrual accounting system must be adopted to the specific economic nature of these organizations. This difference in accounting by private firms is dictated by the fact that the companies strive to work longer term and attract funds from shareholders at lower cost possible by promising them good returns from the investment decisions they make. While hired management of the governmental companies are not usually that long-term horizon driven and are simply hired to carry out specific typically prescribed functions. For the private enterprises management it is more important to show that the business is rolling by reflecting the sales when the products were shipped, for example, while for the governmental bodies it is more vital to represent that the cash is spent according to the schedule and not necessarily rapidly.
Some scholars argue that transferring the public sector to the same economic principles than private firms would be more beneficial to the nation as the U.S.A. And other developed countries enjoy their wealth only due to market environment and profit maximizing actions of the enterprises. On the other hand, a recent study has revealed that transferring some of the governmental defense purchases to commercial base did not lead to more efficiency in this process and only lead to more costs incurred as DOD was no longer able to exploit its' "monopoly purchasing power."
The public sector accounting system also treats differently post employment benefits accounting and is striving to allocate these expenses in the periods in which they actually occur. Furthermore, the law requires governmental bodies to separate transfer of funds between each other and account for them separately either in income or expenses. Within private enterprise, equity can be distributed among the shareholders and is a residual value of the firm. In public companies, equity is more a balancing notion and is contrast to rights of owners in the private business. Required Supplementary Information (RSI) must be submitted together with the annual financial reporting of a governmental body and this addendum is basically a comparison of the funds prescribed to the governmental body by the budget and the actually incurred expenses. In federal government accounting the notion where the funds are allocated from the government to the company only for specific purposes and then are checked to comply is referred to as fiscal accountability.
1) Sunder, S. A Theory of Accounting and Controls for Organizations Producing
2) Basic Governmental Accounting Principles, available at http://www.osc.state.ny.us/localgov/pubs/arm/arm2.htm
3) Besselman, Joseph J., Ashish Arora, and Patrick Larkey, "Buying in a Businesslike Fashion: And Paying More?" Carnegie Mellon University Working Paper, January 1999.
Public- Versus Private-Goods, School of Management, Yale University.
A www.wikipedia.org www.fasab.org
6) Penno, M., Simon, D. Accounting choices: public vs. private firms, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Volume 13(4), Winter 1986.
Basic Governmental Accounting Principles, available from: ttp:/ / www.osc.state.ny.us/localgov/pubs/arm/arm2.htm
Besselman, Joseph J., Ashish Arora, and Patrick Larkey, "Buying in a Businesslike Fashion: And Paying More?" Carnegie Mellon University Working Paper, January 1999.
Federal Government vs. Private Accounting[continue]
"Federal Government Accounting Vs Private" (2006, August 27) Retrieved October 25, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/federal-government-accounting-vs-private-71467
"Federal Government Accounting Vs Private" 27 August 2006. Web.25 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/federal-government-accounting-vs-private-71467>
"Federal Government Accounting Vs Private", 27 August 2006, Accessed.25 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/federal-government-accounting-vs-private-71467
Privatization is the use of the private sector in government management and delivery of public services. Contracting out services predates the Constitution. In fact, in the early nineteenth century, some "inherently" governmental functions such as tax collection, mail delivery, and spying were performed by private contractors. Throughout the twentieth century, the government has continued to rely on contractors. The Clinton administration, under the 1998 Federal Activities Reform Act, required federal agencies
A micro considers the interests and rights of the individual company as the primary concern. Both of these views are valid depending on the lens that one wishes to use. The problem arises when the government is forced to develop policies regarding procurement in this volatile debate. The government must decide whether to take a micro view, favoring the rights of companies, or a macro view that places the
awarding audit contracts by U.S. government departments and agencies Audit Management Red Rationale for and Objectives of the project main and secondary Desktop or literature search Rationale for Search Methodology LITERATURE/DESKTOP RESEARCH Authoritative sources Desktop Findings Justification for audits Evolving role of auditors Types of audit contracts Understanding the Audit Process Best practices and benchmarking Terminology Case Studies Audit management is a fundamental element in government accountability, control and performance management. Certainly there is justification within the Federal government to conduct audits of contracts for the
U.S. Government Deficits Why is it that the U.S. Government can spend more than it brings in through taxes and other revenue? What are the specific reasons why the U.S. can consistently and constantly operate its programs and conduct official business while running a huge deficit? These questions and others will be reviewed in this paper. The Deficit -- why and by how much is the U.S. In debt? A May, 2012 article
Veterans & Retirees; Is Government Keeping its Promise This study aimed at exploring the experiences and perceptions of Veterans belonging to Lousiana and Mississippi about three variables; the accessibility of organization; the accessibility of benefits and availability and adequacy of the facilities being provided by government through VA. The respondents were also asked to suggest whether there is a need for improvement and what should VA do to provide benefits and
Health Care Reform Federal Deficit The American Health Care Crisis and the Federal Deficit The United States spends more than any other country on medical care. In 2006, U.S. health care spending was $2.1 trillion, or 16% of our gross domestic product. At the same time, more than 45 million Americans lack health insurance and our health outcomes (life expectancy, infant mortality, and mortality amenable to health care) are mediocre compared with
" According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). A "national security letter" (NSL) is basically a written demand by the FBI or other federal law enforcement agencies for a group or organization to turn over records or data or documents, with no warrant attached to the demand. They are given out without probably cause or any justice-related back-up, and have been used extensively since the Patriot Act; they are