Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
One could argue here in favor of a positive globalization effect involving countries that joined the new economic world after a change of regime, using the example of Nokia. The company first moved with the production from Finland to Germany and this was the first time when some voices were raised against the stealing of legitimate jobs from honest hard working Finns in order to offer them to the Germans who were equally honest and hard working, but nevertheless not participants in the development of the company. The same story happened with Nokia when it decided to drastically reduce its production in Germany and to move over to a city in the Western area of Romania, a recently free country who is fitting in the world of capitalism and globalization.
Friedman does not banish the effects of globalization, because as he has shown in his books and articles, the process is irreversible and brought to a scale that makes it impossible to control. Countries from the Arab World have responded differently to the Friedman's flattening world, but they were all more or less influenced by its economic effects. Today's economic realities make almost impossible the existence of a country that is not willing to join an alliance of some economic sort. Only a decade away, Mosad Zineldin was writing about the situation of an oil rich country such as Saudi Arabia, in the context of the fourth Nordic conference on Middle Eastern Studies: The...
Its economic development plans promoting rapid industrialization, the creation of essential infrastructure, and compulsory education all combine to provide the basis for a modern way of life"(Zineldin, 1998). Today, Saudi Arabia is one of those Arab countries that adapted to the globalization perfectly, managing to keep the culture boundaries in place.
On the other hand, the very links that make the economy in a flat world depend so heavily on each other can create the conditions for a collapse of proportions when one of the strongest economies in the world encounters difficulties. Even if some would argue it is not an economic recession, the U.S. is going now through economic difficulties and the effects are felt all across the globe. The future will show if the solutions politicians and economists found to get the country out of the crisis are right and how flat world helped them with a mass mobilization to save the world.
Resources:
Friedman, T.L.(2007) the World is Flat.. Picador
Zineldin, M.(1998). Globalisation and economic integration among Arab countries. Retrieved: Oct 12, 2008. Available at http://www.smi.uib.no/pao/zineldin.html
Resources:
Friedman, T.L.(2007) the World is Flat.. Picador
Zineldin, M.(1998). Globalisation and economic integration among Arab countries. Retrieved: Oct 12, 2008. Available at http://www.smi.uib.no/pao/zineldin.html
World is Flat" is taken from a metaphorical point-of-view to highlight the development and advancement of technology in the world. The author, Thomas Friedman, asserts that the world has become flatter because technology together with other factors has turned the world into a smaller place. The author describes the manner in which technology has made the world become more competitive and elucidates what is necessary to compete in this
William Duiker's "fragmentation" argument, found in his Contemporary World History, Fifth Edition (Duiker), acknowledges the fact of globalization and states that Friedman's discussion about the impact of globalization is "stimulating" (Duiker 351). Simultaneously, Duiker believes that there is a reaction to globalization. Duiker believes that societies will react to the globalization trend by trying to preserve: local interests such as local businesses and jobs; their identities; and their senses of
NASA cannot afford to create new technology, and that is a sign of our lack of support of new science and engineering, something that could be critically short in years to come. In conclusion, there are clearly many advantages to the flat world economy that has developed with the advent of the 21st century, and Friedman does a good job of spelling out those advantages quite well. There are disadvantages,
Similarly, Chapter Eight, "This Is Not a Test," is a must read for every CEO, manager and government official. In this chapter, Friedman has highlighted that "lifetime employment is a form of fat that a flat world simply cannot sustain any longer" (p. 284) (Jones, 2005). He argued for a policy of "lifetime employability," which is a kind of social agreement between government and business and the people that, in
Yet Mr. Friedman does not go to this depth of analysis and relies instead of lengthy, conversational passages in the book that could be trimmed and made more potent, relevant and valuable. The concept Mr. Friedman discusses of the Untouchables is altogether too elitist as well, and this chapter of the book is an illusion; there is no job safe in a globalized world. Only those willing to compete
Flat (2006), Thomas Friedman describes the new global capitalist economy and how it has affected the United States, as well as the type of skills and education that will be most in demand in the 21st Century. Even white-collar workers, managers and engineers have been doing poorly because of globalization, while unskilled and semiskilled blue-collar workers have been devastated. Construction and manufacturing workers with only a high school education