Flight Line Ground Safety General Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:

However, recent spot checks suggest that many operators are unaware of the risk and therefore have not taken precautions to prevent dangerous concentrations of CO (NIOSH, 1984). This could prove to be fatal.

When employees are around aircraft it is important to practice the utmost safety, in order to ensure the safety of the ground crew, the people are on board of the aircraft, and all other employees involved in the handling of the flight line. Individuals must watch and listen for newly arriving or passing aircraft. If driving, employees must keep a proper distance from the aircraft and drive slowly, at 5 miles per hour only (AFOSH, 2003). Caution must also be taken with forklifts and k-loaders, as they must be lowered while aircraft is moving.

When working at night and around hazardous equipment, employees must utilize luminous wands, practice safe driving techniques, as those mentioned above, and use proper safety precautions when around hazardous materials. Many airline workers may be unaware of the potential hazards in their work environment, which makes them more vulnerable to injury. Hazards to keep in mind that can become safety risks are those such as: baggage handling, controlling carbon dioxide levels, electrocution, vehicle injuries, ramp operation incidents, disruptive passengers, and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), to name a few (OSHA hazards and solutions, 2005).

Baggage handling can cause back injuries. Many times employees lift heavy baggage, which can eventually take its toll on airline workers. In addition, electrocution can occur on the flight line. For example, one man got electrocuted while he repaired airport runway lights. He was a 54-year-old certified electrician of an electrical contracting company. According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), SARS is a viral respiratory illness caused by a corona virus, called SARS-associated corona virus (SARS-CoV). SARS was first reported in Asia in 2003. Over the next few months the illness spread to more than two dozen countries in North America, South America, Europe and Asia, before the SARS global outbreak of 2003 was contained (CDC, 2005). This disease is important for airline employees to become aware of and to learn proper safety measures to assist in avoiding such a disease from occurring, as it can be fatal.

Personal Safety Equipment (PSE) are very important to use when on the flight line. For example, employees working on a flight line normally, use goggles, for eye protection, if needed, they wear ear pieces or headphones to block the harmful loud noises planes can cause; in some instances, depending on the job position they have, they may use a mask or ventilator to protect themselves from inhaling fumes of fuel or oil.

Maintenance standards are important to maintain around the flight line and when aircraft are present or arriving. For example, exit routes must be maintained and kept free of explosive or highly flammable furnishings or decorations. There should be safeguards in place designed to protect employees during an emergency (e.g. sprinkler systems, alarm systems, fire doors, exit lighting) and they must be in proper working order at all times (OSHA maintenance, 2005).

There are some differences in regards to military and non-military flight line standards; however not many. The military do follow OSHA and FAA standards; however, there are some exceptions as mentioned earlier, when in certain instances, some equipment, systems, and operations are "uniquely military" (OSHA definitions, 2005). This means that they are unique to the national defense mission, such as military aircraft, ships, submarines, missiles, and missile sites, early warning systems, military space systems, artillery, tanks, and tactical vehicles; and excludes operations that are uniquely military as well, such as, field maneuvers, naval operations, military flight operations, associated research test and development activities, and actions required under emergency conditions (OSHA definitions, 2005). In addition to these the Air Force has a unique set of standards, which are the Air Force Safety Standards 91-100.

In conclusion, aircraft flight line safety procedures are important to an organization in the airline industry. Employers and employees, alike, must learn and implement the proper safety procedures in their particular workplace, so as to ensure proper safety procedures and to avoid any potential hazardous problems that may occur. Many employees working the flight line may be unaware of potential problems that could occur in their work environment. This is why education and implementation of these safety procedures and potential hazards are vital to the health and safety of employees and of those in and around their work environment. By educating, implementing, and practicing these safety procedures, airline employees are able to live a safe and healthy life.


AFOSH, Std 91-100 (2003). Retrieved June 20, 2005, from AFOSH Web site: http://www.hill.af.mil/safety/chklists/ChecklistIndex.htm

CDC (2005). Retrieved June 20, 2005, from CDC Web site: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/sars/factsheet.htm

FAA (2005). Retrieved June 19, 2005, from FAA Web site: http://www.faa.gov/about/mission/activities/

NIOSH: Controlling carbon monoxide hazard in aircraft refueling operations (1984). Retrieved June 20, 2005, from NIOSH Web site: www.cdc.gov/niosh/84-106.html

OSHA (2005). Retrieved June 20, 2005, from OSHA Web site: http://www.osha.gov/index.html

OSHA Act of 1978, (2005). Retrieved June 20, 2005, from OSHA Web site: www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document-p_table=OSHACT&p_id=3359

OSHA baggage handling (2005). Retrieved June 20, 2005, from OSHS Web site: http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/baggagehandling/ramp_manual.html

OSHA definitions, 1960.2(i), (2005). Retrieved June 19, 2005, from OSHA Web site: www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document-p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=9698

OSHA hazards and solutions (2005). Retrieved June 20, 2005, from OSHA Web site: http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/airline_industry/hazards.html

OSHA measuring exposure (2005). Retrieved June 20, 2005, from OSHA Web site: http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/noisehearingconservation/exposure.html

OSHA maintenance (2005). Retrieved June 20, 2005, from OSHS Web site: www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document-p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=9725

OSHA standards, Section 5(a)(1) and Section 5(a)(2) (2005). Retrieved June 20, from OSHA Web site: http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/airline_industry/standards.html[continue]

Some Sources Used in Document:


Cite This Term Paper:

"Flight Line Ground Safety General" (2005, June 22) Retrieved December 9, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/flight-line-ground-safety-general-64855

"Flight Line Ground Safety General" 22 June 2005. Web.9 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/flight-line-ground-safety-general-64855>

"Flight Line Ground Safety General", 22 June 2005, Accessed.9 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/flight-line-ground-safety-general-64855

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Flight Data Recorder

    Flight Data Recorder From a system viewpoint, prevention is a great deal less expensive than accidents. Two Boeing 737 accidents remain entirely unexplained at this time (Colorado Springs, 1992; Pittsburgh, 1994). Both airplanes had older digital flight data recorders that did not record control surface positions; that information might very well have led to an unambiguous finding of probable cause. In sharp contrast, the Aerospatiale ATR-72 that crashed after extended flight

  • Safety in the Skies Starts

    Although the causative organism was rapidly identified (salmonella), and its introduction into the food chain proved to be a key factor, the scale of the outbreak was the result of an interaction of other factors. As with a major aircraft accident, none of the factors alone would have caused the near disaster that occurred. (Burslem, Kelly, & Preston, 1990, p. 40) This is a very useful reminder that airline disasters

  • Safety Market Forces and Selling

    In a commercially competitive atmosphere for some, being safe is seen as a costly, elusive and never-ending responsibility with uncertain returns on the investment. But those people often miss the real target. Accidents, incidents and even the smallest events harm customers and staff, not to mention injures the profit line, the reputation or the morale within the company. Managing safety entails finding the perfect balance between the creation of services

  • Flight Crew Resource Management

    CRM Flight crew resource management is the science of training flight crews to interact and communicate in a highly authoritarian environment while at the same time making use of the intelligence and professional resources of all the members of a flight crew. In the cockpit, the captain is in unquestionable control of the airplane because he is ultimately responsible for all aspects of the flight, including hardware, equipment and personnel on

  • British Airways Flight 9

    British Airways Flight 9 The Institution of Mechanical Engineers report entitled "Volcanic Ash: To Fly or Not to Fly? reports that the prediction of "ash movement and dispersal has become more sophisticated over the years. In the UK, the Met Office uses Numerical Atmospheric-dispersion Modeling Environment (NAME), computer model, developed after the Chernobyl accident in 1986." (2010, p.3) This model is reported to have tracked various atmospheric dispersion events and to

  • Aviation Safety Program Management

    Aviation Safety Program Management The average air traveler rarely sees the essence of recognizing the aviation safety regulations in place. People only and often recognize the factors of safety after a horrific accident occurs. Within the daily working schedules in the private and commercial flights, countless lives of innocent passengers depend on the full implementation of the safety regulations. These safety procedures are in place to protect the lives of the

  • Crash of Thy Flight Tk

    TALPA Vice Chairman Mete Dane established flight TK 1951's method to Schiphol and talked about the motive why it had abruptly lost altitude that had been pointed to wake turbulence. Researcher's Argument and Conclusion In conclusion, the researcher believes that the reason of the crash was because there was an issue with the design of the plane. The researcher supports his argument by using the investigation from the Dutch. The Dutch

Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved