Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Research Paper:
Are television networks giving fair representation to gay marriage and gay rights?
A scholarly, empirically researched article in the Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media points out that while network television stories do discuss the issue of homosexuality and gay marriage, gays and lesbians are "…rarely given the opportunity to offer their own perspectives" (Moscowitz, 2010, p. 36). The research in this article involved using 93 stories taped from network TV that represented the gay marriage issue. There were 38 stories gleaned from ABC; 29 from NBC, and 26 from CBS. The video was obtained from the Vanderbilt Television News Archive.
A total of 12,419 seconds (about 207 minutes) of total time was carefully reviewed in these 93 news stories on national television. The analysis was conducted based on three components: the news story; each source cited in the story; and "each gay or lesbian couple" (Moscowitz, p. 31). The findings show that the "debate" in the video clips "was dominated by conventionally 'straight' perspectives." And while gay and lesbian couples and gay rights activists made up "16% and 8.2% respectively," of the sources that were cited in the video reports, political figures commenting on the issue made up 27% of the time, "conservative activists" composed 13.4% of the sources, and the president (Bush) and White House spokespersons were 10% of the sources shown on the video news reports (Moscowitz, p. 36).
The president and his representatives, conservatives who are against gay marriage, political and legal analysts, religious leaders "…were allowed more time to speak in news reports on the marriage issues than were gay and lesbian citizens" (Moscowitz, p. 36). Of the gay and lesbian couples that were the focus of the 93 news stories, only "20%" were given the opportunity "to speak at all." In other words, the gays and lesbians in these news stories appeared more as "image bites" than "sound bites" and the couples that were the "dominant visual focus" of the 96 stories "contributed little to the linguistic content of the stories"(Moscowitz, p. 36). Another way of saying what the appearance of the gays and lesbians amounted to was that "they were granted the status of visual ornamentation," Moscowitz explains (p. 36).
On the marriage issue, ABC, NBC, and CBS did not "othered" or "exocticized" the couples in "stereotypical ways," the author continues. The couples were "largely seen but not heard" Moscowitz asserted, adding (p. 37) that more research needs to be conducted into exactly how "the debate is constructed across a wider array of news sources that reach different audience" (p. 37).
A populist argument in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage
Alex Rajczi, a philosophy professor from Claremont -- McKenna College has written a passionate populist piece arguing in favor of same-sex marriage in the journal the Monist. Rajczi states (p. 475) that the "basic principle of our society is that the government must offer all opportunities equally unless there is some good reason to do otherwise." An example is a driver's license -- anyone of proper age can have one "unless there is good reason to do otherwise" (Rajzci, p. 476). He goes on to assert that the government doesn't withhold opportunities "on the ground that people or their (lawful) behaviors are immoral." For example, even if the majority of people agree that sex outside of marriage is immoral -- and even if they are correct about that issue -- it would be "wrong to withhold driver's licenses from those who have had pre-marital or extra-marital sex" (Rajczi, p. 476).
What the public and the government do in fact count as a "good reason to withhold an opportunity" is when that person's "receipt of the opportunity would create an unacceptable risk of harm to others" (Rajczi, p. 477). Example: issuing a driver's license to a 13-year-old would create an unacceptable risk to pedestrians and to other drivers. Hence, the author's argument is that just because some people in society see same-sex marriage as immoral, doesn't mean that it should be banned because it does not create an "unacceptable risk of harm to others." Just because "homosexual conduct is (allegedly) immoral or because it would (allegedly) place a stamp of approval on homosexuality" is no reason to ban it.
As Rajczi has asserted, if opposite-sex marriage is allowed, then marriage between same-sex partners should be allowed as well, since allowing same-sex marriage harms no one. Society is slowing changing and the polls are showing that acceptance of gay marriage is slowing gaining ground, which is a good thing. America is supposed to be a country where civil rights are enjoyed by all people, African-American, Asian-American, Native American, Latinos, Caucasians and others. it's time to allow gay and lesbian citizens their rights too, and sanction their right to be married if they choose to do so.
Avery, Alison, Chase, Justin, Johansson, Linda, Litvak, Samantha, Montero, Darrel, and Wydra,
Michael. "America's Changing Attitudes toward Homosexuality, Civil Unions, and Same-
Gender Marriage: 1977-2004." Social Work. 51.1 (2007): 71-78.
Dolan, Maura. "Judge Strikes Down Prop. 8, Allows Gay Marriage in California." Los Angeles
Times. Retrieved Dec. 3, 2010, from http://www.latimesblogs.latimes.com. (2010).
Egelko, Bob. "Appeals court Prop. 8 hearing likely key to result." SFGate.com. Retrieved Dec.
4, 2010, from http://www.sfgate.com.
Head, Tom. "10 Really Bad Arguments Against Same-Sex Marriage." About.com. Retrieved Dec. 3,…[continue]
"Gay Marriage Should Be Accepted" (2010, December 04) Retrieved November 29, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/gay-marriage-should-be-accepted-11685
"Gay Marriage Should Be Accepted" 04 December 2010. Web.29 November. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/gay-marriage-should-be-accepted-11685>
"Gay Marriage Should Be Accepted", 04 December 2010, Accessed.29 November. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/gay-marriage-should-be-accepted-11685
Gay Marriage A Discussion about the Relevant Factors that Affect Same-Sex Partners in the Modern World Gay marriage, or same-sex marriage, is one of the most controversial topics in the modern age. It can be a divisive topic because many people feel strongly about the issue from both sides. Many argue that any form of partnership should have equal rights as the traditional marriages do and cite legal arguments and make reference
Homosexual marriage does not pose a threat to me or my manhood therefore I am for it." Although I am heterosexual, I know what it means to long for union with another human being. I will choose a woman for my partner, but if another man desires to choose one of his own sex, there is no harm for me in his choice. In fact, since we are both
Gay Marriage The issue of gay marriage is a very hot topic in today's world of current events. Many have attributed this quest of equality as a civil rights issue that compares to many of the civil rights battles fought in our history. The purpose of this essay is to make an argument for gay marriage as a viable means of expression for society. I will present this argument by using
Homosexual Marriage and the Impacts on Parenting Homosexual marriage refers to legal matrimony between two individuals of the same gender and it is a phenomenon which has come under a great deal of scrutiny and debate during the last few years. As of the time of this writing nine states have legalized gay marriage, and 31 states have constitutional amendments which ban gay marriage to some extent -- a fact alone
These percentages are illustrated in Figure 3. Interestingly, research has demonstrated that the when public opinion is sought between "gay marriage" and "civil union" the results differed greatly. Although the rights being suggested were similar, when framed as gay marriage, the discussions became polarized along ideological lines, than when framed as civil unions ("Framing," n.d.). Clearly individuals were less threatened by the idea of civil unions than gay marraiges, even
American marriage would reflect American principles of liberty and self-government. Unlike the hordes of serfs, servants, and subjects in other parts of the world, American citizens were going to shape their own lives and determine their country's destiny. Just as citizens would be self-governing in the political realm, they would also choose their spouses freely." (Hymowitz, 2004) Hymowitz shares the fact that the development of the idea of romantic love
However, society's consciousness matured and grew in understanding of what a loving community is, and came to realize that to exclude other human beings based on prejudice is not God's love, but rather fear and ignorance (Conan). According to Kohut, 14% of the general population in American society believes that homosexuality is due to upbringing, 42% believe it is a matter of lifestyle, and 30% believe people are born homosexual