Global Strategic Alliances Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:

global strategic alliances that exist between two companies in the computer industry. Hewlett Packard and SAP are the two companies selected for evaluations here. A brief overview of the companies will be provided. HP is a leading provider of products, technologies, solutions and services to consumers and businesses. HP offers services spanning IT infrastructure, personal computing and access devices, global services, and imaging and printing. (HP.com, 2005) William Hewlett and David Packard founded the company in 1939. The company now has 140,000 employees with capabilities in 160 countries. Today, HP conducts business in 43 currencies and 15 languages. HP essentially offered hardware components for the computer and the technology industry. Their main product lines included computers, printers, monitors and other peripheral devices for computers. "HP is #1 globally in inkjet, all-in-one and single-function printers, mono and color laser printers, large format printing, scanners, print servers, and ink and laser supplies." (HP-rankings, 2005)

ERP software design started in 1972 when five engineers in Mannheim, Germany created the company, SAP (Systemanalyse und Programmentwicklung). SAP provided customized ERP software and services to businesses. Richard Lawson, Bill Lawson, and John Cerullo created Lawson Software in St. Paul, Minnesota in 1975. They supplied a pre-packaged version of ERP to organizations that did not wish to spend prohibitive amounts of money on designing customized versions of the software. In 1977, Jack Thompson, Dan Gregory, and Ed McVaney formed JD Edwards. Soon, Larry Ellison created the Oracle Corporation. Jan Baan started The Baan Corporation in 1978. BAan specialized in providing financial and consulting services to organizations. Dave Duffield and Ken Morris founded Peoplesoft in 1987. (SaptechWebpage, 2001) ERP systems cost millions of dollars. The results for the efforts in innovation are often not immediate but take years to be identified and observed. (Roll, 2003) While traditionally developed for the manufacturing and production industries, the products from the above companies have received wide-scale application in other industries due to the potential improvements that they offer. (Al-Mashari, 2003) SAP offers custom enterprise-management systems to organizations.

Pros and Cons of the partnership

HP is incorporated in the U.S.; whereas, SAP is incorporated in Germany. Both are well recognized in their respective fields of operation. In 1989, HP and SAP entered into a strategic partnership to offer integrated solutions for the computer industry. HP went through various changes in organizational structure (at different stages) in order to arrive at its current position in the market. SAP also underwent similar restructuring and adjustment during its growth.

As of 2005, both companies remain successful in offering business solutions for big and mid-sized corporations. HP offers the hardware (servers) that is able to run UNIX, Linux, or Windows operating systems; SAP offers "ERP applications pre-configured for companies in oil & gas distribution, and consumer foods and high-tech device manufacturing. SAP will provide software, implementation services, maintenance, end-user training, support, functional management, and application management. HP will provide the data center and services that include operations, infrastructure hosting, storage on demand, business recovery, managed Web solutions, and security services." (EQUIS, 2005) In addition, the company also collaborates on offering the necessary service to support the business solutions that are offered.

SAP traditionally offered its products only to big businesses and large corporations. By collaborating with HP and identifying a new market segment -- the mid-sized company -- it has been able to access a whole new rage of customers. HP and SAP are also making the move to compensate vendors who are willing to modify and adapt the products for new uses and applications that help make the service more marketable to a greater section of the population. (Garner, 2004) The recent stepping down of the HP CEO, Carleton Fiorina, in addition to poor performances has resulted in many market fluctuations in the past year. HP had always prided itself on its methods of management. Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard create an open and corporate management style. The two entrepreneurs ran the company by communicating the need of the company to their employees and allowing the employees to carry out their duties with the flexibility and individual styles so long as the ultimate goals of the company were obtained. Fiorina attempted to change drastically the culture and the structure of the organization that did not sit very well with the shareholders and the employees. Extensive restructuring and re-engineering had also created an environment where employee loyalty and trust was at an all time low.

All ERP systems when implemented are expected to "solve the problem of fragmentation of information in large organizations by consolidating all business operations into a uniform system environment" where the consolidated information will be more useful in improving decision-making. (Somers, Nelson and Karimi, 2003) Success of ERP however, also depends on the employees' computer literacy to operate and perform tasks that need computer and software knowledge. (Sheng, Pearson and Crosby, 2003) SAP offers customized products. And the true benefits of the utilization of many of the products takes a number of years to show results. To compound the problem, the total cost of ownership and the fear of the software become obsolete are very real. In spite of this, SAP has been able to register a growth of nearly 10% for the 2004 financial year.

While the alliance has proved to be profitable so far there are some issues that generally occur with global partnerships. Working with different cultures and collaborating in an industry where knowledge and intelligence of the employee determine the viability of the company can be challenging. HP, while being heavily invested in manufacturing and production also spends a sizeable amount of its revenue on R & D. Until 1950, all branches of the organization were located within the U.S. With more demand for HP products, factories were set up all around Europe in the 50's; and in the 60's HP entered the Asian market. HP was always known for its decentralized organizational structure and mode of operations. For an organization that is technology-based, knowledge sharing is important. Proper channels for facilitating knowledge sharing -- whether on a formal or informal basis -- are necessary if the company is to survive in an increasing global market.

The mission statement of HP, drawn up by Hewlett and Packard, stressed the importance of customer loyalty. Also emphasized was the need to run the organization in a manner that would generate profits for all the shareholders. This would lead to the attainment of market leadership in the core business of technology development; and also a growth in the market share. To achieve the above, dedicated and enterprising employees had to be recruited and retained. Sufficient incentives would be necessary to keep them satisfied. Working in an increased global environment and the fear of outsourcing of many activities undertaken by HP has impacted the morale of the company.

SAP has invested extensively in its workers. It realizes that the worker has to be offered comparable benefits and rewards to keep their satisfied. In addition, its HR department is also very aware of the need for succession planning and career development for their employees. For a technology company, research and development is a key factor and managing by objective in this department to get the product out of the door is important. (BusinessWeek, 2001) SAP realizing this is investigating all the options available to them.

SWOT analysis of SAP and HP

Hewlett Packard

HP has displayed a tremendous ability to grow and develop over the years. The founders of the company had instilled a culture of employee participation and acknowledgement. R & D. was and continues to be important for the company. Ex-CEO, Fiorina had been trying to get to a front/back organizational model for the company and away from the managing by objective strategy. Especially in a market driven economy, the front/back organizational model (front-end, back-end organizational structure, in which two "back-end" units focus on product development, while two "front-end" units sell those products to corporate and consumer customers) is good. This however, proved to be a challenge for the company. Currently, worker motivation is low and worker participation is also suffering. HP has also outsourced many of the operations to countries like India, Taiwan and China. And as a result, it only retains the high-level research and developmental work. Collaborating with many companies such as Intel to develop the next new microprocessor is also displaying that HP still has the technical, intellectual and the financial capability to carry out major innovations.

"During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2004 (fiscal 2004), HP organized its operations into seven business segments: the Imaging and Printing Group (IPG), the Personal Systems Group (PSG), Enterprise Storage and Servers (ESS), HP Services (HPS), HP Financial Services (HPFS), Software and Corporate Investments." (NYSE, 2005) While many of the objectives, such as offering good worker-incentives and establishing a balance between work and personal life were met, the company was floundering in other arenas such as technology development and market share in recent times. During the acquisition…[continue]

Some Sources Used in Document:

"ERP-History" 

Cite This Term Paper:

"Global Strategic Alliances" (2005, March 16) Retrieved December 10, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/global-strategic-alliances-63121

"Global Strategic Alliances" 16 March 2005. Web.10 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/global-strategic-alliances-63121>

"Global Strategic Alliances", 16 March 2005, Accessed.10 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/global-strategic-alliances-63121

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Strategic Alliances and Growth Alliances Should Be

    Strategic Alliances and Growth Alliances should be structured in one of four ways: as an equity alliance, as a non-equity alliance, as a global alliance, or as a joint venture (Cartwright & Schoenberg, 2006; Rigsbee, 2000). How the alliance is structured depends on several different things, because not all alliance structures would be appropriate for all types of companies or all types of negotiations. It is very important that the alliance

  • Strategic Alliances in the Hospitality

    While companies of all types and sizes stand to benefit from strategic alliances, the relevant literature indicates that companies competing in the hospitality industry are particularly well situated to gain a competitive advantage in this way. In this regard, Rahatullah and Raeside report that, "The strategic alliance literature reveals that resources alone can not bring competitive advantage, but complementary resources can contribute to the strategic fit of partners in the

  • Strategic Alliances Describe Each Company the Companies

    Strategic Alliances Describe Each Company The companies analyzed are the Eastcom Systems and Convergence Strategies. Strategic alliance between Eastcom Systems and Convergence Strategies is formed in direct response to customer demands for International TEM solutions in EMEA and APAC regions. The alliance was formed in November 2009 wherein Eastcom Systems Pte Ltd., the global provider of world class universal cost optimization solutions for large and medium sized enterprises, formed an alliance with

  • Strategic Alliances Between Multinational Corporations

    Strategic Alliances in Multinational Corporations Hewlett-Packard, Starbucks and Wal-Mart all have invested decades of time and expertise into how they structure strategic alliances globally, and each has taken a unique and differentiated approach to fulfilling their strategic objectives for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the context of these relationships. The intent of this analysis is to address how strategic alliances benefit these companies, an analysis of CSR initiatives arising out of

  • Strategic Alliances

    Wal-Mart At the time that Wal-Mart embarked on a program of international expansion, the United States was undergoing negotiations with Mexico and Canada over the North American Free Trade Agreement or NAFTA and this brought Mexico to the attention of Wal-Mart as a fit global venue (Hill 2002). Although the Mexican economy, at the time, was beset with huge barriers to cross-border trade and investment, substantial state involvement in business activity

  • Fuji Xerox Sub Strategic Alliances & Growth The

    Fuji Xerox Sub-Strategic Alliances & Growth. The joint venture between Xerox and Fuji Photo Film to form Fuji Xerox was considered by many to be one of the most successful joint ventures between an American and Japanese company in history. The purpose of the strategic alliance was to overcome growing competition in the global marketplace. Fuji Xerox is only one portion of the Xerox Group, which is comprised of several larger divisions.

  • Global Business Strategies Exit Strategy When a

    Global Business Strategies Exit Strategy When a firm looks to complete a joint venture, it is necessary to determine what type of exit strategy (or strategies) would be appropriate. This strategy allows the company to leave the agreement without facing extreme los, and it also allows the business to maintain the respect that they had gained in the industry already. In the proposed joint venture with the Murakami Mill in Japan, the


Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved