Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
The process of genetic modification of an organism
Genetic modification of an organism is the process by which the genes of an organism are altered to introduce useful genes that are believed to help it to grow and thrive in any given condition. The genes contain DNA, a basic building block of all living organisms that is responsible for the presence or absence of certain traits or characteristics and modification of these genes creates new traits in the plants.
The genetic modification of a crop begins with the isolation of genes that are proved to have certain characteristics so that the same traits can be induced in other crops. The next step is to insert the gene into another crop and the most common technique is through a process called recombinant DNA that transfers the genes through the plasmids. Particle bombardment is another technique used to transfer the gene to another plant. Once this is done, the different plant cells are monitored to identify the modified ones from the original cells. The transformed cells are used to create new plants through tissue cultures under controlled environmental conditions. The growth is monitored to check if the plant exhibits the new characteristics and finally, it is tested for performance and safety before it is released into the market (African Biosafety Network of Expertise, 2010).
Pros and cons of the process of genetic modification
When GMO technology was introduced in 1970s, the idea was to create crops that would grow in harsh conditions and provide abundant food for the growing human population. During the last three decades, unfortunately, none of those have taken place. Only two kinds of crops were produced -- herbicide resistant and pesticide resistant crops and both these crops have only been successful in boosting the profits of companies involved in GMO crops.
The advantages of genetically modified foods is their increased resistance to pests, herbicides and diseases. They are in a better position to thrive in places that could not support these plants in their natural form. This has proved to be a blessing for third world countries that are suffering from high levels of poverty and malnourishment as they are able to consume staple foods such as rice that include other nutrients as well. Lastly, some plants like GM poplar trees are used to clean the soil and water pollution (Whitman, 2000).
One of the prominent disadvantages of genetically modified foods is its impact on the health of consumers. The increase in the number of diseases in the U.S. And other countries has been attributed in part to the consumption of these foods. Recent research conducted on animals show that these genetically modified foods release toxins and allergies that affect every organ in their body. In fact, many research trials have even led to the sterility and death of animals. Also, the lack of knowledge and the unreliability of the effects of these foods on humans make it unsafe for consumption (Institute of Responsible Technology, no date).
Another disadvantage is its impact on the environment. When certain plants are modified for human consumption, it has a detrimental effect on other organisms that depend on it for survival and this in turn, affects the local ecology. Besides, there are also economic concerns about the increased cost of GM seeds and the inability of small farmers to afford them.
Conflicts of interest between Monsanto and FDA
Monsanto is one of the largest agro-business companies in the country and they exert a profound influence on the policies in Washington and the FDA. The FDA has declared the products to be "Generally Recognized as Safe" (GRAS) even in the absence of an in-depth research on the effects of genetically modified foods on human beings (Institute of Responsible Technology, no date).. This lenient approach is the cause of all the health problems and unintended side effects plaguing the country today.
The role of the FDA has been largely incompetent. A good case in point is the introduction of a cattle drug in the U.S. named rBGH produced by Monsanto and this failed to get approval in Europe and Canada despite intense lobbying. When this drug was introduced in 1994, the FDA's deputy commissioner Michael Taylor barred dairy companies from making a distinction between the products that contained rBGH and…[continue]
"GMO Food The Process Of Genetic Modification" (2012, June 12) Retrieved December 9, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/gmo-food-the-process-of-genetic-modification-80639
"GMO Food The Process Of Genetic Modification" 12 June 2012. Web.9 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/gmo-food-the-process-of-genetic-modification-80639>
"GMO Food The Process Of Genetic Modification", 12 June 2012, Accessed.9 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/gmo-food-the-process-of-genetic-modification-80639
The persons in this camp identify benefits such as disease resistant plants and plants that produce higher yield with less maintenance cost. They eagerly point to the advances in corn production and other spheres as evidence of the safety and viability of genetic modification. There is also a median position where the benefits of the technology are acknowledged but these persons believe that greater testing in the laboratory should be
This is only in the case whereby protein introduced possesses allergenic properties and is introduced to the edible part of the particular plant. Due to the difficulty of predicting allergens, there should be careful selection in gene donors so as to avoid widespread consequences. Bacteria in the digestive tracts can pick up antibiotic resistant genes present in genetically modified foods and it may bring about an increase in the problem
Other avenues include television, newspapers and magazines, radio, web pages, and people to people exchange. Effective communication should be built on an understanding of the nature of consumer concerns. Information on biotechnology modifications should include the reasons for modification, degree of regulatory oversight, methods and extent of safety verification, and impact of modification on consumer safety and the environment." (Bruhn, nd) According to a report from the Food Policy
Genetic Engineering The eradication of global hunger is a noble goal, and implies a human society that has progressed to a point where all humans are engaged in some form of implicit social contract with each other. We care about global hunger because we do not want to see other humans starve, regardless of the circumstances that brought about their hunger. Before tackling the issue of global hunger, however, we must
Food, Inc. The Industrialization of Farming and Agriculture: Effects on the Environment and the Way We Live The film Food, Inc. By award winning documentary maker Robert Kenner starts out with a simple goal: it wants to find out where our food comes from. In his quest to answer this question, however, Kenner, and his two narrators, Pollan and Schlosser, find some unpleasant and startling facts about the way in which our food
This is because of the various allergies, and antibiotic resistant plants and crops. However, arguments are now being made in favor of GE, and there is now evidence that it is possible to produce health as well as environmental benefits to man by the process of GE. Will GE be able to stop world hunger? It is now thought that GE food is necessary if the world were to
Genetic Engineering The process of altering genes, or genetic engineering, has become a more heated subject as science and technology continue to evolve. In fact, with DNA technology, genetic modifications within plants and other organisms has become a major development, especially in the world of agriculture and medicine. However, there is still the possibility of the inability to contain the spreading and somewhat "tainting" of non-genetically modified organisms, which seem to