Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Research Paper:
Group Communication and Decision-Making Methods
This paper will focus on two primary factors important for the leaders, in the modern world, to completely conquer. These two factors are:
Decision making methods
The paper also provides proof using prior researches done on the aforementioned subjects, focusing primarily on the role of the leader in instigating motivation amongst the employees as well as improving the overall decision making processes. The paper will also take into consideration the views presented in different books written today like the Power of Impossible Thinking by Jerry Wind, Colin Crook and Robert Gunther, first published in 2004 as well as the Prepared Mind of a Leader by Bill Welter and Jean Egmon first published in 2005.
Decision making methods and Leadership
Communication is all about the approach towards a common goal. It is the lifeblood of an effective and successful leader (Wind, Crook and Gunther, 2004). All leaders aim to entice their employees with a motivational beginning to a project and one that brings the employee inadvertently to the aim of the project. This is how one's ability to think can actually be powerful if his decision making skills match up.
Of course, over the years researchers focused on the power of thinking and the impact it has on the leader's decision making skills have taken different approaches which have also been appreciated. Some researchers have focused on constructing a mental design of how we interpret our surroundings and hence given a summary of how powerful thinking would help them in enhancing this particular mental interpretation as well as their overall decision making ability. Another popular approach to approaching similar themed researches is to take a more academic approach and reviewing similar literature and conclusions that have been made in the past with regards to the same topic (Wind, Crook and Gunther, 2004).
Wind, Crook and Gunther (2004) in their book took one of the more practical approaches in the sense that they allowed the leader's personal understanding and response to what he interprets lead how he adopts their ideas to instigate top decision making structures. Coming from a creative reading background, I found this book to be an interesting balance between a creative writing blend and an academic representation of the topic, without being too boring or overwhelming with technical details about the schematics of a leader or the aspects of decision making.
The leader's reaction to a situation is mostly dependent upon how he/she mentally interprets it as opposed to what the situation provokes out of him/her. A leader must always lead by example especially in a group situation when different personalities and cultures can lead to potential clashes. Hence, I feel that the book written by Wind, Crook and Gunther (2004) and researches carried out by Conger & Kanungo (1998) and Sosik and Dinger (2007) are very important for modern leaders when deciphering the dos and don'ts of modern decision making. These aforementioned studies and book depend upon the reader's interpretation of what is written. Unlike other similar researches or books, these provoke the reader to think the way they preach. The beauty of this approach is hence the fact that the reader is involved as much as the writers in teaching the power of thinking. The process of the content present in these researches and book is not complete without the input of the reader. Furthermore, they are designed to allow you to interpret the main theories present about decision making structures based on your own personal business experiences and life situations (Wind, Crook and Gunther, 2004).
In my opinion, once group communication is conquered the leader can also transform the following aspects:
Instigate a positive transformation in:
Figure out how to get oneself out of a rut at work
Instigate a positive change in the progression of one's company
Help enhance one's status against the competitors in the market
Help one instill a positive and sustainable communication flow on a personal and group level
Help manage the flow and level of knowledge that is processed and channeled one's way
Present different options for an individual to mentally interpret the society and situation being faced
Help you become a charismatic leader
Help design high performance teams structures and sustain them
It is a simple fact that the transformation of one's mental approach can transform the overall results one attains in personal and professional life endeavors (Wind, Crook and Gunther, 2004). One of the major reasons why I found these researches and book to be extremely useful in my life was that they helped me understand how I, as a leader, can act as the sole motivator of my team as a charismatic leader. Looking at similar studies conducted in the past on what the qualities of a charismatic leader are I realized that these researches and book had them all.
For case in point, a recent study conducted by Sosik and Dinger (2007) asserts that "Shamir, House, & Arthur's (1993) self-concept based theory of charismatic leadership provided the general theoretical framework for this study. This theory proposes that the leader, whose behavior is not only instrumental but also expressive of the self, develops and articulates vision statements that strongly engage followers' self-concepts in the interest of the vision articulated by the leader. In a political case study illustrating their theory, Shamir et al. (1994) linked examples of charismatic leadership (e.g., Jesse Jackson) with the articulation of inspirational vision themes, and non-charismatic leadership (e.g., Michael Dukakis) with the articulation of instrumental vision themes" (Sosik and Dinger, 2007).
Similarly other researchers have also concluded that the whole structure of charismatic leadership is explained as part of the social influence factors process that incorporates the construction and expression of suggestive and practical ideas. Furthermore, a charismatic leader is also meant to instigate inspiration and motivation for a team effort that exhibits understanding of the environmental inclinations and shows alternative or original daring activities. These activities cause the leaders to not only be the managers of a project but also be the role models for their employees (Conger & Kanungo, 1998; Shamir et al., 1993). The book proposes that the employees usually get attracted to the leader and then the aims of the project or its vision. This then will enable the employees to "experience task meaningfulness, and make sacrifices for the collective cause" (Sosik and Dinger, 2007).
Sosik and Dinger (2007) further support what has been said in the book by asserting that they "operationalize charismatic leadership in the present study along core behavioral dimensions using relevant measures from the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ-5X; Bass & Avolio, 1997). Our approach was to utilize this widely used survey to assess two core dimensions of charismatic leadership described in the literature and consistent with the theory of Shamir et al. (1993) of charismatic leadership, and Thrash & Elliot's (2003) psychological construct of inspiration, characterized by evocation, motivation, and transcendence. These dimensions are inspirational motivation and idealized influence which represent the two "charismatic" components of transformational leadership. Inspirational motivation involves communicating high performance expectations through the projection of a powerful, confident and dynamic presence. Such behaviors evoke powerful emotional responses from followers that energize them to exert extra effort. Idealized influence involves the display and attribution of role modeling for followers through exemplary personal achievements, character strengths and/or behavior. Such behaviors promote the transcendence of ordinary preoccupations and self-interests of followers to form a strong emotional bond with the leader (Bass & Avolio, 1997)" (as cited in Sosik and Dinger, 2007).
"Chance favors the prepared mind." This statement first made by Louis Pasteur, a 19th-century scientist, was the premise for this discussion on group communication methods applied by the leaders today. Pasteur made this statement to explain his capability to create and solve innovatively whatever complications or shortcomings he faced in his professional career (Welter and Egmon, 2005). Using this approach worked out brilliantly for Pasteur as he was able to carry out numerous successful researches on the processes of crystallization as well as fermentation. Both these aspects were able to help the industries at the time completely revolutionize and enhance their overall processes whether they were dairy industries or other science-based industries. Either way, Pasteur was a great example of what one must be prepared for mentally in case an opportunity knocks on their doors. The leaders today can use the example of Pasteur to instigate the level of preparation they must have in the ever-evolving market to truly make the best of the opportunities that present themselves.
Prepared Mind Leadership
In a very relevant and recent book, the authors write that "in our working definition of Prepared Mind leadership, we see leadership as the practice of continuously envisioning [an] opportunity for growth within complex, dynamic environments, built upon core principles the organization is committed to sustaining and using as the basis for value delivered to all of its stakeholders. Implied in our definition is that leaders, no matter where they are…[continue]
"Group Communication And Decision-Making Methods" (2011, March 06) Retrieved October 28, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/group-communication-and-decision-making-120990
"Group Communication And Decision-Making Methods" 06 March 2011. Web.28 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/group-communication-and-decision-making-120990>
"Group Communication And Decision-Making Methods", 06 March 2011, Accessed.28 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/group-communication-and-decision-making-120990
Competition should not be the primary focus of a group decision-making setting because this will not lead to solution-oriented thinking. Rather than focusing on the problem that requires solving, group members are more likely to entertain themselves with methods they can employ to "win" other members of the group to their line of thinking or problem-solving methods. Behaviors that promote best practices in group decision-making include behaviors that encourage all
While allowing an authoritarian voice to hold final sway over what is done may be least desirable, it may be necessary in a very spread-out group with many areas of expertise, or if the leader bears the brunt of the responsibility for the project and has greater knowledge of the different organizational factors involved. There is no single perfect formula for forming a cohesive group, making decisions, and arguing in
group decision-making process. Identify successful unsuccessful experience group decision making. Discuss factors affected group's effectiveness, drawing concepts readings. Please include headings sectional headings. Group decision making The decision making process is pivotal within any organized group and it influences the ultimate success of the overall entity. In modern day times, the organizational leaders no longer make and implement decisions top down, but engage their subalterns in the decision making process. The group
Group Communication One of my main tasks at work is to transcribe the minutes of the weekly departmental meetings; thus, since my report requires me to present the minutes of the meeting in a concise, yet organized, form, I use the organizational strategy or method of writing. In the organizational strategy, I take into account how the information is presented in a document -- in my case, the minutes of meeting
Decision Making Styles Leadership is the position of authority in which it is possible to provide guidance or direction through making decisions that will affect other people. There are many methods of decision making, and each individual person has a unique decision making style. Many different studies have explored the vast and quite possibly infinite numbers of decision making styles that are exhibited by people. One example of such personality studies is
Decision Sciences Decision-making is an important activity for top management in any enterprise. Strategic thinking is required for making useful decisions. For example, business executives plan strategies to access market share, to deal with employees, to react to competition and to decide on career growth. Decision Sciences is a discipline on its own that provides techniques and methods to take decisions in any practical situations. In this paper, a list of
Communication Skills Attendant upon my transition into the role of Mental Health Staff Nurse, I have devised the following reflective model-to-action plan for the formulation of workable communication skills. Realizing that "…all healthcare professionals require a reasonable level of numeracy for the safe administration of medicines and fluids, budgeting, and the interpretation of statistics," (http://learntech.uwe.ac.uk/numeracy 2011), I determined to include practical strategems for assessing ratios and SI units. Realizing also that contemporary