Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
Another aspect which is important to be taken into account in respect to human rights issues is the right to seek asylum. The 1951 UN Convention for Refugees states that asylum seekers should be helped by the country where they seek assistance in order to prevent the return of the people in a situation which would put their lives or their integrity in danger. However, for the Australian government such a provision is less important than the actual attempt to cut down on immigration and reduce the possibility of people entering legally or illegally in the country. In this sense, there is a famous case which points out precisely this attitude of the Australian government which pointed out the fact that indeed, there is no particular desire for the Australian officials to go beyond their national interest and work for the global one. Thus, in 2001 Australia refused to give assistance to some 434 Afghan seeking asylums in Australia. After a serious dispute with the Norwegian government, the Australian government officially denied access for the vessel in the Australian port (Australia accused of violating UN convention, 2001). The reason pressed forward was the intent of the government to stop immigration. Still, in a democratic state, with one of the most important economic perspectives in the world, is the breach of a United Nations Convention the best means for intervening on an immigration policy? From an international point-of-view and from the moral legitimacy of the UN Conventions, it is fair to say that the Australian government acts in a wrongfull manner.
There have been wide considerations in recent years over the validity of same sex relationships. In the past this aspect has been dealt with in more silent environments; still, as the U.S. deals with it openly and nowadays discussing the issue of lesbian relations or gay marriages is no longer a taboo issue, the law must deal with these matters properly. On the international scene, the discussions focus on the right of the individual to express himself and his sexual identity vs. The proper behavior in the society and inside a social environment. In any situation, it is a matter of human rights. In the end, no government can be allowed to limit the freedom of expression of an individual. Still, by banning gay marriages, governments achieve just that. On the other hand however, the public display of affection between same sex persons can be seen as breaching the limits of our social behavior and extending those of the private life beyond the intimacy of one's own home.
This difficult dilemma cannot be solved without a proper judgment of the elements involved, from the respect for human rights to the weight this issue has on the next electoral campaign. Yet the Australian government is split on this matter, a case which may prove that a certain attention is being given to the respect of human rights. Thus, the piece of legislation was given twice in 2007 a strong refusal from the legislative body in the sense that "the ACT move would have allowed homosexual couples to enter into civil unions with the same legal rights as traditional marriages" (Karvelas, 2007) and thus civil and moral rights would have been respected.
The other side of the coin comes from the more traditional views of the political spectrum who do not consider same sex marriages as an element which could be compared in terms of rights, obligations, and duties. This evolution is not viewed in terms of the respect for human rights but rather in terms of the need for the maintenance of a conservator approach on the issue.
The Prime Minister however is reconsidering his own position concerning same sex marriages in the sense that Australia must prove that it stands by the respect of human rights, no matter their area of manifestation. The discussion on the right of two people of the same sex is indeed a moral one, but, at the same time it is a practical one. The recognition of same sex marriages would imply the existence of a law that would "end discrimination under welfare, tax and superannuation laws" (Karvelas, 2007).
The Australian government is in a clear confusion because on the one hand, the legalization of same sex marriages implies their recognition as individuals whereas the same action implies additional costs. In any situation however, the human rights record would improve should a positive decision on the matter be taken.
In general, the system of the United Nations is perceived as the most important reference point for the international scene, in terms of the legislation, the international influence. However, these aspects are theory based. Rarely have we seen the UN take action against a state. South Africa in the early 1990s was sanctioned for the policy of apartheid; Australia on the other hand, although shows signs of abuses taking place is merely "accused" of a nongovernmental organization which has practically little if no influence. Aside from the double standard, the Australian government is decided to follow its own national immigration policy rather than to abide by the international laws it set create. Therefore, can there be a discussion on the respect for human rights in Australia? One may say yes, depending on the interests of the Australian government and its desire to recreate a positive image. Others say no, as there are limited results to show an actual respect for human rights. No matter the answer, the question is an open end question.
Amnesty International, 'Australia: Too many open questions: Stephen Wardle's death in police custody'. Library: Asia Pacific. (1996). http://asiapacific.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGASA120131996?open&of=ENG-AUSat 19 May 2008.
Australia accused of violating UN convention. RTE news (2001) http://www.rte.ie/news/2001/0829/australia.html
Australian Government, Human Rights. Attorney General's Department. (2008) http://www.ag.gov.au/www/agd/agd.nsf/Page/Humanrightsandanti-discrimination_Humanrightsat 19 May 2008.
Human Rights Watch, 'Australia: Anti-Terrorism Proposal Threatens Civil Liberties'. Human Rights Watch (2006) http://hrw.org/english/docs/2005/10/13/austra11863.htm. At 19 May 2008.
Karvelas, Patricia. 'PM to review same-sex couples' rights'. The Daily Telegraph. (2007) http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,21,00.html. At 19 May 2008.
McCorquodale, Robert, 'Introduction - Implementing human rights in Australia'. Australian Journal of Human Rights (1999) http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AJHR/1999/32.html
Pilger, John, 'Australia Is the Only Developed Country Whose Government Has Been Condemned as Racist by the United Nations'. New Statesman. Volume: 129. Issue: 4508. (October 16, 2000).
Shah, Anup, Australia and Human Rights. Global Issues (2000) http://www.globalissues.org/HumanRights/Abuses/Australia.asp#HistoricoppressionoftheAboriginalPeopleat 19 May 2008.[continue]
"Human Rights In Australia Bearing" (2008, May 19) Retrieved October 23, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/human-rights-in-australia-bearing-29737
"Human Rights In Australia Bearing" 19 May 2008. Web.23 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/human-rights-in-australia-bearing-29737>
"Human Rights In Australia Bearing", 19 May 2008, Accessed.23 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/human-rights-in-australia-bearing-29737
S. President George W. Bush. Thus, when the blast in Bali, at the southern point of Indonesia, directed the fury of 9/11 at a popular attraction to Australian holiday-makers, Australia became a nation motivated in foreign policy by the apparent threat of global terrorism. This would be demonstrated by its unwavering willingness to follow the United States even into its poorly-informed and ill-advised invasion of Iraq, providing combat troops and civilian military aid. During the lead- up
.. it's healthy, it's somebody's way of life, it's somebody's livelihood, it's somebody's business.(ibid) This is a strongly worded statement and indictment of an uncaring humanity. However, bearing in mind the daily evidence of cruelty to animals one cannot but feel that there is an element of truth to this argument. Commercial reasons for abuse One of the central reasons or "justifications" for animal abuse and possibly why so many turn a blind
Interventional Project Proposal for Early Intervention Project In the recent past, the issue of family violence against children in the aboriginal communities has attracted significant attention of different stakeholders involved in the protection of the rights of the children (Backlar & Cutler, 2002). While significant attention has concentrated on the identification of the effective strategies for curbing general family violence, limited research has been done on family violence on children in
Copyright Law in Hong Kong Internationally, Hong Kong has been obligated to protect copyright pursuant to various international as well as domestic copyright conventions which apply to Hong Kong. Amongst the importance of intellectual property right, copyright as well has been recognized under Article 15(1) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and cultural rights (ICESCR) specifying that "The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone… to
Schwartz (2006), many arguments are presented, most of which generally criticize the Western treatment of First Nations people or address women's rights issues. As an example, "Aboriginal Australia: Current Criminological Themes" by Rick Sarre (2006) focuses on the affect of British colonialism in Australia on the Aborigines, connecting it to a vast overrepresentation of Aborigines in the Australian penal system. "The Left Realist Perspective on Race, Class, and Gender"
Australian Federal Politics One of the most disillusioning things that can happen to a citizen of a democracy is to discover that one's own government - the legal and political extension of oneself - has lied to one. This is far more damaging both to an individual's belief in his or her government and in the end to that government itself than is a citizen's disagreement with that government. This does
Rationalist Theories of International Relations Despite the name, rationalist theories of international relations are anything but, limited as they are by both an almost childlike understanding of human behavior and a catastrophic lack of imagination. Rationalist theories of international relations, like the Objectivism which developed in the same post-World War II period, rely on a number of assumptions which have since been shown to be empirically false. Rationalism assumes that the