Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
I had a lot to learn from Giorgione. Having been taught in the fresco technique by Ghirlandaio, I was not acquainted much with oil painting and did not truly know the mastery of this type of painting. How to mix the oil and the paints so that one was in enough quantity? More so, how to use enough oil so as to obtain the right amount of darkness or pale shade of a color? It was Giorgione who taught me the technique of oil painting on canvas and it was during this time that I started this type of painting.
A liked to take my subjects from popular Venice, from the streets, from common people and Venice had plenty of these to provide. Of course, this was the time of religious painting, not only in Venice, but throughout Italian Renaissance, yet I was taken by the mystery that common subject could provide and their stroke of realism. The Bellini brothers had shown me some reproductions of Dutch and Flemish paintings and I noticed that they were more used to painting casual subject and that even in religious paintings, ordinary people had their place. There was something that I didn't like with religious paintings: you had to paint idealized bodies of idealized characters. It was the same with mythological painting: how could I portray Jupiter as an old and crippled man. I wanted to see realism in my painting, I wanted to see the traces of humanism there, so I took to the streets to find my characters.
And I did. I started painting the landscape of Venetian streets, the Place of Saint Mark, the canals, ordinary people on the street. Somehow, this interest in their state brought me to meet the Doge, who wanted to commission a portrait of himself and hearing that I had a gift for displaying people, asked that I would be brought to him. At this time, the Doge of Venise was Leonardo Leonardi, who had commissioned an older portrait of himself to Gentile Bellini. How could I rival with that?...However, as I began work on his portrait, I discovered that drawing a profile bust could prove an easier enterprise than what a landscape for example. This was because in this case, there was no perspective I had to ponder on, but was only interested in the foreground, the Doge's bust. It was also easier than painting full-size humans, as Leonardo's rule on body proportion had no application here. As I had mastered through time the art of oil painting on canvas, I trusted that the result would be to the Doges liking. And it truly was a masterpiece...Even now, decades later, my portrait of Doge Leonardo Leonardi still hangs in one of the corridors in the Doges' palace.
My fame was now throughout the whole of Italy. Everyone had heard of the innovative painter that revolutionized art by bringing in acute traces of realism in his painting and that mastered all the modern techniques of the time: perspective, fresco or oil painting on canvas. In the meantime, Julius II, Michelangelo's patron had died and was followed to the throne by my old acquaintance, Giovanni de Medici, who became pope as Leo X. A few words are in order about this most original character. He had inherited from his family a taste for luxury and the arts and was said to have declared upon becoming a pope: "Let us enjoy the papacy since God has given it to us." Highly cultivated, he encouraged art, poetry and theater, but he also had a negative side: he was an incredible spender. It was said upon his death that he had consumed three pontificates: that of Julius II (who had never been a great spender and who had kept the costs for the papal household at 48,000 ducats, half of what Leo spent), that of himself and that of his follower to the Papal throne. He was to suffer the embarrassment of having his treasury totally emptied and left huge debts after his death.
However, he spent much money on commissioning works of art and this could only be to my best interest. He wanted someone who would paint some of the chambers in the Vatican Palace and my interest in fresco painting had still remained over time. I immediately stepped up for the challenge and packed my bags for the Eternal City. What was to become known as the Stanzas is probably my masterpiece.
In the first chamber, I thought to describe an intellectual debate between Aristotelis and Plato. Plato points his finger upwards, in order to express his alignment to the world of ideas and idealism, while Aristotelis points downwards, towards the Earth. I wanted to picture a few of the philosophers of Antiquity, among which Pytagoras stands out at the bottom of my painting. As a little humor, I chose to make my self-portrait as Pythagoras, but for the rest I used common models from the street, as I had done for many years now. I found old men with beards to picture the philosophers and carefully studied their faces to create the perfect setting for a philosophical debate.
My study of human anatomy that was induced by Leonardo and his paintings and that I had conducted for several years now came in quite handy when painting the second room, with the Fire of Borgo theme. Borgo was one of the quarters in Rome, consisting mainly of shacks that caught fire on a terrible day. The foreground of the painting displays a strong man carrying an old man over a wall and thus saving him from the fire. The man displays every inch of human muscle, carefully thought out and portrayed. I wanted to give out a sense of physical human idealism here and perhaps I have succeeded. Wanting to make a gesture towards my commissioner, in a good Flemish tradition, I portrayed him in my painting as he blesses and encourages the people from his balcony.
A found my true artist expression in Rome. I continued to paint for Pope Leo and for his successors and became a milestone in Renaissance art history. To my honor, Giorgio Vasari, who was at that time writing a biography of the most well-known artists from Cimabue onwards, asked me to give him a keen accounting of my life and works. I was thus included in his book, "The Lives of Painters, Sculptors and Architects" which became a reference for generations to come in the study of art in Italy in our times.
What have I left behind as an artist I sometimes wondered myself? My life was rich in experiences: I had the greatest opportunity of all- to meet fellow artists like Giorgione or Ghirlandaio and I knew how to learn something from each of them, something to which they excelled. I perfected their techniques and was able to work from there so as to create more beautiful works. I trust that history will be mild towards me and will remember me not as a plagiator, but as one who continued the tradition of great Italian artists.
http://www.artcyclopedia.com/feature-2000-06.html (for Giorgione's the Tempest)
4. Vasari, Giorgio. The Life of Painters, Sculptors and Architects. Bucharest 1968. I used this extensively for accounts on Ghirlandaio, Giorgione and the Bellini brothers. Even if somewhat subjective, it gives a good knowledge of the times.
5. La Pittura Italiana. Mondadori, Rome, 1997. Used for all accounts on different paintings.
La Citta Eterna. Roma. Lozzi roma. 1996. As an inspiration for the part describing the paintings done in Rome.
Enciclopedia Generale. DeAgostini.1997
Chiaroscuro is a technique that involves combining dark shades of colors with brighter colors in order to achieve a sense of unnatural light in the painting.[continue]
"Italian Renaissance Don't Know Where" (2003, November 26) Retrieved October 23, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/italian-renaissance-don-t-know-where-55596
"Italian Renaissance Don't Know Where" 26 November 2003. Web.23 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/italian-renaissance-don-t-know-where-55596>
"Italian Renaissance Don't Know Where", 26 November 2003, Accessed.23 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/italian-renaissance-don-t-know-where-55596
Italian Renaissance Art Mannerism Mannerism is a period of European art that arose from the later years of the Italian High Renaissance around 1520. It went on until around 1580 in Italy, when a more Baroque style developed to take its place, but Northern Mannerism lasted into the first part of the 17th century, all through much of Europe. Stylistically, Mannerism includes an assortment of methods swayed by, and responding to, the
Technology has now reached such dizzying heights that it attempts to give us here and now the Empyrean that Galileo's telescope neglected to find. How has it worked? Perhaps that should be the subject of another discussion. All the same, it is interesting to note that modern science is still attempting to explain the mysteries of the universe that in the medieval world were simply accepted on faith as
Women During the Renaissance Period The Renaissance (14th to 16th centuries) in European history is widely considered to have been a period of "re-birth" and a turning point for the Western Civilization. It is believed to be the transitory period between the Middle Ages and the Modern Age when the social, cultural, and artistic conservatism of the Middle Age was replaced by the dynamic philosophy of humanism, which emphasized individualism and
Troubadours actually represent an example of that change in the social set up that signifies individualistic approach. Troubadours represent the rejection of social locks on the ability of people to be romantically in love. Italian critic Mario Casella also attempted to note the significance of troubadours as a special development of Augustinian Philosophy of individualistic approach. (Silverstein, 122) The troubadours dealt with varied important subjects like war, politics, personal satire
" James a.S. McPeek further blames Jonson for this corruption: "No one can read this dainty song to Celia without feeling that Jonson is indecorous in putting it in the mouth of such a thoroughgoing scoundrel as Volpone." Shelburne asserts that the usual view of Jonson's use of the Catullan poem is distorted by an insufficient understanding of Catullus' carmina, which comes from critics' willingness to adhere to a conventional -- yet incorrect
They were followed in 1936 by the Harlem River Houses, a more modest experiment in housing projects. And by 1964, nine giant public housing projects had been constructed in the neighborhood, housing over 41,000 people [see also Tritter; Pinckney and Woock]. The roots of Harlem's various pre 1960's-era movements for African-American equality began growing years before the Harlem Renaissance itself, and were still alive long after the Harlem Renaissance ended.
The parallels are of Sheikh Mohammad are drawn with King Abdul Aziz of Saudi Arabia who used oil to build the foundation of modern Saudi Arabia. He can also be considered a CEO who is managing his emirate like a big company using the modern management principles. He is using the principles of modern participatory management as he does not confine himself to boardrooms or high power meetings and