Learning Theories to the Current Educational Environment Research Paper
- Length: 6 pages
- Sources: 6
- Subject: Teaching
- Type: Research Paper
- Paper: #80578201
Excerpt from Research Paper :
Learning Theories to Current Education
In psychology and education, learning is normally described as a process that brings together cognitive, emotional, and influences of the environment being experienced for obtaining, enhancing, or enacting changes in an individual knowledge, values, skills, and views of the world. Learning as a process put their center of attention on what takes place during learning. Explanations of what takes place forms learning theories. A learning theory is an effort to express how people and animals learn; thus assist us understand the essentially complex learning process. Learning theories have two main values. The first one is in offering us with conceptual and vocabulary framework for interpreting the instance of learning that we survey. The second one is suggesting places to search for answer to practical problems. The theories never provide us with solutions, but they do direct our concentration to those variables that are vital in getting solutions.
The original challenge to the behaviorists was present for publication in 1929 by Bode, a gestalt psychologist. He condemns behaviorists for the reason of relying too much on overt behavior to explain learning. Gestalt psychologists recommended looking at the patterns instead of isolated events. Gestalt views of learning have been integrated to become cognitive theories. Two major assumptions bring about this cognitive approach: previous knowledge plays a vital role in learning and that the memory system is an active organized processor of information. Cognitive theories look further than behavior to clarify brain-based learning. Cognitivists regard how human memory operates to promote learning. For example, the physiological processes concerning sorting and encoding events and information into long-term memory and short-term memory are essential to educators working in line with cognitive theory. The main disparity between gestaltists and behaviorists is the locus of being in charge of the activities of learning: the individual learner is major to gestaltists as compared to the environment that behaviorists emphasize.
Once memory theories such as Baddeley's working memory model and the Atkinson-Shiffrin memory model were formed as a theoretical framework in cognitive psychology, new cognitive frameworks of learning started to come out during the 1970s, 80s, and 90s. Nowadays, researchers are focused on topics like cognitive load and information processing theory. Such theories of learning have a responsibility of influencing instructional design. Feature of cognitivism can be traced in learning how to learn, intelligence, social role acquisition, learning, and memory as correlated to age.
Learning and cognition
The basic assumptions that bring about formal education systems are that students retain skills and knowledge they obtain in school, and they are capable of applying them in situation beyond the classroom. However the question is are these assumptions accurate? From the research we find that, even if students report without applying the knowledge got from school, a substantial part is retained for several years and lasting retention is robustly reliant on the early level of mastery. One study established that university students who learn courses of child development and obtain good grades, if testing is administered after 10 years later, their average retention scores will be nearly 30%, while those who achieved realistic or lower grades indicated an average retention scores of nearly 20%. There is minimal consensus on the vital question about how much knowledge obtained in school is transferred to tasks being met outside formal educational settings, and how these transfer takes place. A section of psychologists argue that evidence of research for this type of far transfer is inadequate while others argue that there is a lot of evidence of far transfer in particular domains. A number of perspectives have been formed within which the theories of learning in use at educational psychology are created and contested. These include cognitivism, social cognitive theory, behaviorism and constructivism. Educational psychology has researched and applied theories within each of these perspectives.
In the current educational psychologists, the cognitive perspective is extensively held as compared to the behavioral perspective, maybe since it admits causally-related mental constructs such as emotions, beliefs, traits, memories and motivation. Cognitive theories argue that memory structures determine how information is perceived, processed, stored, retrieved and forgotten. In the memory structures theorized by cognitive psychologists are separate but linked visual and verbal systems described by Allan Paivio's dual coding theory. Educational psychologists have applied cognitive load theory and dual coding theory to clarify how people learn from multimedia presentations.
The effect of spaced learning, a cognitive phenomenon robustly backed up by psychological research, has wide applicability within education. For example, students have been realized to do well on a test of knowledge concerning a text passage once a second reading of the passage is belated but not immediate. The research of educational psychology has confirmed the educational applicability of other findings from cognitive psychology, like the advantage of using mnemonics for immediate and belated retention of information.
Problem solving is considered by several cognitive psychologists as basic to learning, it is an essential topic research in educational psychology. A student is considered to interpret a problem by allocating it to a schema got from long-term memory. In any case the problem is allocated to the wrong schema; the attention of student is afterward focused away from features of the problem that are conflicting with the allocated schema. The vital step of getting a mapping between a pre-existing schema and the problem is always cited as behind the centrality of analogical thinking to solving problems.
Developmental psychology, and particularly cognitive development psychology, creates an exceptional perspective for educational psychology. This is due to the psychology of cognitive development and educations to join on a number of vital assumptions. First, the cognitive development psychologies describe competence of human cognitive at successive phases of development. Education objective is to assist students' gains knowledge and develop skills which are well-matched with their understanding and problem-solving potentiality at diverse ages. Consequently, the level of students on a developmental sequence offers information on the type and level of knowledge they can assimilate, which in turn can be used as a frame for organizing the subject matter to be taught at different school grades. This is the cause of why Piaget's theory of cognitive development became very influential for education, particularly science and mathematics education. In the similar track, the neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development propose that in accumulation to the concerns above, sequencing of skills and concepts in teaching must take into consideration of the working memory and processing capacities that describe successive age levels, Furth, H.G., & Wachs, H. (1975).
Psychology of cognitive development engages understanding how cognitive transform happen and recognize the process and factors. Educations also rely on cognitive change, since the creation of knowledge presupposes effectual teaching methods that would make the student from a lower to graduate to a higher level of understanding. Mechanisms like reflection on definite or mental actions and vis-a-vis option solutions to problems, tagging latest concepts or solutions to symbols that assist individual to recall and mentally influence just a few, given how mechanisms of cognitive development can be used to facilitate learning.
Finally, the cognitive development psychologies worry together with peoples differences in the organization of cognitive processes and abilities, in their rate of change, and in their mechanisms of change in their rate. The belief underlying intra- and inter-different individual can be useful educationally, because knowing how students differ in regard to the various dimensions of cognitive development, such as processing and representational capacity, self-regulation and self-understanding, and the a variety of domains of understanding, such as scientific mathematical, or verbal abilities, would allow the teacher to take care of the need of the diverse students so that no one is left lagging.
Social cognitive perspective
Social cognitive theory is a vastly influential fusion of cognitive, behavioral, and social elements that was originally established by educational psychologist Albert Bandura. In its prior, neo-behavioral incarnation called social learning theory, Bandura put more emphasis on the process of learning observation in which behavior a learner changes due to observing others behavior and its penalty. The theory recognized a number of factors that indicate if observing a model will affect behavioral or cognitive change or behavioral. These factors consist of the development of status of the learners, the supposed competence and prestige of the model, the outcome received by the model, the relevance of the behavior of the model and result to the goals of the learner, and the learner's self-efficacy. The model of self-efficacy which played an essential function in present developments of the theory referred the belief of the learner in his or her ability to perform the modeled behavior.
From the experiment done by Schunk and Hanson, indicated that grade 2 students who had formerly faced difficulty in learning subtraction, shows the type of research motivated by social learning theory. One group of students used what they observed from the teacher about subtraction after demonstration by a teacher to participate in an instructional program on subtraction. A second group used what they observed from other…