Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
House of Mirth, by Edith Wharton. Specifically, it will look at the theme of success in the novel, and how a success-oriented society can destroy the weak and untrained.
THE HOUSE OF MIRTH"
Lily Bart begins her tumble into poverty from the very beginning of the book, because she does not conform to society, and she cannot become a success in the world of business, because she does not even understand what success is. From the very start of the novel, success is a strong and prevalent theme, and it is clear Lily is not going to be a success, when she does not even understand the concept. "Later he [Selden] inquires: 'Is there any final test of genius but success?' Lily replies: 'Success?' She hesitated. 'Why, to get as much as one can out of life I suppose. It's a relative quality after all. Isn't that your idea of it?'" (Underwood 365).
The only success Lily understands is the success society puts on a well-dressed woman. "The clothes are the background, the frame, if you like: they don't make success, but they are a part of it. Who wants a dingy woman? We are expected to be pretty and well-dressed till we drop -- and if we can't keep it up alone; we have to go into partnership" (Wharton 14). Lily is beautiful, but poor, which means she cannot even be well-dressed, so what chance does she have to "go into partnership." Ultimately, Lily's pathetic idea of success is what society says it is for a young girl, marriage to the right man. She fights against it throughout the entire novel, and in the end, she dies because she cannot conform to this societal idea of success.
From the onset, Lily is painted as a tragic figure, even when she is laughing and "gay." It is clear she is unhappy and even bored with her life, and cannot see any way out except to marry, and who can she marry, when she has "nothing" to offer a husband. She has no dowry, and at best can only hope to marry someone else who is poor, when she longs for the finer things, such as travel. The conversation in the beginning of the novel may be light, but it is clear from the start Lily and success are two words that do not go together. "Since she had been brought up to be ornamental, she could hardly blame herself for failing to serve any practical purpose; but the discovery put an end to her consoling sense of universal efficiency" (Wharton 289).
Selden's idea of success is fairly similar to whatever Lily may think, "My idea of success, he said, is personal freedom...Freedom from worries...from everything; from money, from poverty, from care and anxiety, from all the material accidents. To keep a kind of republic of the spirit,...that's what I call success" (Wharton 68). That idea of success is "rich" in one word. If you are rich enough to be free from worry about money, then you are successful in Selden's eyes, and in society's eyes. If you are poor, you are clearly a failure, and it does not matter if you are happy or not, you are only successful if society says so.
Wharton is satirizing society here, and the rules society imposes on people. She is also attempting to illustrate how society imposes its will on people, and makes them conform, like Lily. Lily tries not to conform, not to marry, to make in on her own, but it kills her in the end. Society is a strict master, and if you go against the "norm," you will probably fail, just as Lily did. Of course, there are exceptions, but if they become truly successful then society embraces them, and they become part of the norm. Eccentric millionaires are a common example. If they were not rich, society would view them as "weird" or "oddball." If they are rich, they are indulged as "eccentric" or "eclectic." Again, you can be as odd as you want if you are "successful," i.e. "rich," but if you are poor, then there is no hope for you. "And the London market is so glutted with new Americans that, to succeed there now, they must be either very clever or awfully queer" (Wharton 184).
Ultimately, Lily is shallow and petty, and Wharton is using this characterization as part of her satire on society. Lily thinks she…[continue]
"Literature House Of Mirth" (2002, November 08) Retrieved October 21, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/literature-house-of-mirth-138289
"Literature House Of Mirth" 08 November 2002. Web.21 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/literature-house-of-mirth-138289>
"Literature House Of Mirth", 08 November 2002, Accessed.21 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/literature-house-of-mirth-138289
In her book Edith Wharton's Women author Susan Goodman writes that Lily suspects "…not much separates the business of marriage from the business of prostitution" (Goodman, 49-50); still, Lily is aware that a prostitute sells "her time, not her soul" -- which Lily has been asked to do. Goodman claims that Lily has a certain "moral appeal" which springs from her "persistent refusal to define herself as a commodity…" (p.
She says she envies Seldon's work, even though he is not of the highest orders of society, but she cannot emulate his masculine example: "Ah, there's the difference -- a girl must, a man may if he chooses." She surveyed him critically. "Your coat's a little shabby -- but who cares? It doesn't keep people from asking you to dine. If I were shabby no one would have me: a
House of Mirth The film revolves around the early years of the 20th Century and the changing faces of the economy hence the social response to such changes. It is predominantly a depiction of the lifestyle that most ladies opted for with the increase in urbanization and amassing of wealth by a few individuals. Lily Bart, the chief character in the movie, is depicted as one who is highly influenced by the
Denied marriage, the only other societal option is suicide. Society is the agent of her demise, not Lilly: "her life is not unpleasant until a chain of events destroys her with the thoroughness and indifference of a meat grinder." Goetz, Thomas H. "Flaubert, Gustave." World Book Online Reference Center. 2006. [1 Oct 2006] http://www.aolsvc.worldbook.aol.com/wb/Article?id=ar200180. Biographical overview, provides insight into Flaubert's role as a uniquely realistic writer, thus stressing Emma's economic and moral
In this simple, somewhat old-fashioned novel in which happiness is demonstrated by young girls successfully marrying, the ending of the novel is much more preferable to the beginning. The novel ends, of course, with Elizabeth marrying Mr. Darcy in a state of happiness. The beginning of their relationship, however, was characterized by a sense of tension and perhaps even mutual dislike on the part of both parties, as Mr. Darcy
When Edith Wharton tells us that "it was the background that she [Lily] required," we understand that both Emma Bovary and Lily have a very important thing in common. They are first of all women in the nineteenth century society, fettered by social conventions to fulfill any kind of aspirations or ideals. A woman, as it is clearly stated in both novels, had no other means of being having
guys history homework. I required write pages BOOK REVIEW ( book report!) based book THE GREAT Gatsby's Greatness The zeitgeist that The Great Gatsby was written in was extremely influential to F. Scott Fitzgerald's tale, which is undeniably American and an excellent example of the Lost Generation of writers with which he is typically associated with. Both written and set during the Roaring Twenties as the country still basked in its