Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
Management Account in the Public Sector and Management Accounting in the Private Sector: A Comparative Review
The late 20th and early 21st centuries have brought increasing change to almost every country in the world, Australia included. Globalism describes, in fact, the increasing unification of the world through economic means (reduction of trade barriers, support of international trade, and mitigation of export and import quotas). They goal for globalization is to increase material wealth and the distribution of goods and services through a more international division of labor and then, in turn, a process in which regional cultures integrate through communication, transportation and trade. The overall theory is that if countries are tied together cooperatively economically, they will not have needed to become political enemies. Additionally, the idea of globalism and international trade has changed the way Australian's view public and private businesses and the opportunities afforded them because of investment, infrastructure development, and participation in a more global economic structure.
In Australia, as in much of the developed world, there are differences between public and private accountancy. The private sector is typically composed of organizations that are non-governmental and privately owned; corporations (both profit and non-profit), partnerships, charities, foundations, etc. The public sector, on the other hand, is composed of organizations that are owned, operated, or controlled by the government -- a public body or public authority. The combination of globalism, transparency in accountancy, international regulations regarding reporting of fiscal results, and greater attention from stakeholders has caused a number of changes in the way data is disseminated and accountancy issues are managed in Australia.
In recent years, there have been a number of issues that have contributed to a new paradigm when thinking about accounting. Certainly, the global financial crises demonstrated that both the public and private sectors need the highest quality account standards, as well as full transparency in order to engender trust from the public. There are, of course, diverse ways to accomplish this; but we must remember that we are no longer dealing only with country specific issues. While we may be focused on the legal and business definitions within Australia, accountancy and surrounding issues in the EU and America, as well as global banking and investment, affect the manner in which we view proper procedures.
As the 21st century unfolds, we are told that the world is embracing globalism -- a key change in the economic, political and cultural movements that, broadly speaking, move the various countries of the world closer together. This idea refers to a number of theories that see the complexities of modern life such that events and actions are tied together, regardless of the geographic location of a specific country (political unit). The idea of globalism has become popular in economic and cultural terms with the advent of a number of macro-trade agreements combined with the ease of communication brought about with the Internet and cellular communication. Indeed, as the process and potential of globalism increases in the 21st century, several different fiscal and legal issues have developed that assist organizations in developing standards that will allow an easier approach to global business (Godfrey & Chalmers (eds.) 2007). However, as we have seen with companies like Enron, the use of accounting data can be at the heart of fraud and public confidence and trust, thus standards must be developed as companies consistently move towards global business opportunities and a semi-merging of methods in both public and private sectors (Inkpen & Ramawamy 2006).
Background to Accounting Types
Regardless of the country of origin, most accountants follow GAAP, or "generally accepted accounting principles," which converges with the International Accounting Standards Board. GAPP," has very specific meanings for the accounting profession. These principles govern the licensing and standards of all accountants, and were designed to allow the ethnical believability of certified accounting documents throughout the industry. These guidelines are a standard, a framework for fiscal accounting reporting and responsibilities. It includes, but is not limited to, rules accountants should follow in recording and summarizing transactions and preparation of documents (for more, review: Financial Accounting Standards Board 2012). The basic issue surrounds the manner in which both public and private organizations utilize data -- just as it is with international organizations. Using data must have some degree of commonality between public and private sectors in order for reporting to be understood and transparent (Granof & Wardlow 2011).
Along with standards, there are a number of issues that are pertinent to accountancy within Australia that also have an impact on the public and private sector as Australia moves even more into the global arena. Most of these standards are focused on the way public and private entities report their data -- liabilities, assets, etc. so that there is more of a global approach to the convergence of financial reporting standards (Jones 2010). The new IAS will specifically apply to liabilities that surround global issues such as: legal disputes, statutory obligations, environmental obligations and certain contractual presumptions. In this particular case, it will not apply to pensions, tax or insurance liabilities since these issues are adequately addressed elsewhere. There are three major examples for these changes: 1) Addressing the inconsistencies with other IFRSs; 2) Achieving a more global methodology in accounting standards and practices, and 3) Improving the manner in which liabilities are measures in IAS 37 (IASC Foundation 2012).
Background to Public and Private Sectors
It is important to understand the basic differences between the public and private sectors since many rules, privacy rights, and expectations are different between the two.
The private sector is typically composed of organizations that are non-governmental and privately owned; corporations (both profit and non-profit), partnerships, charities, foundations, etc. Anything not directly owned or controlled by the government is considered private. The public sector, on the other hand, is composed of organizations that are owned, operated, or controlled by the government -- a public body or public authority. This can be local, regional, national; educational bodies, health care, police and prison, etc. The public sector uses fiscal resources to provide products or service; the private sector needs products and services to provide fiscal wealth.
In terms of accountancy or issues that affect accountancy, we can make a better comparison between public and private using a template:
Public Sector Accountancy
Private Sector Accountancy
Structure and accountancy may be influenced by outside or special interest groups.
Organization has authority to revise the business and/or key positions.
The election or appointment process limits time for completion of goals.
There is continuity of leadership that allows long-range, more strategic, planning.
Fiscal punishment for operating below budget.
Excess funds distributed as salary or bonus.
Objectives measured by the process and/or programs.
Objectives measured by results and/or profits.
Highly visible to public, pursued by media.
Isolated, usually, from media and operates with anonymity.
Reduction of costs by across-the-board program cuts.
Reduction of costs by strategically selecting specific line items or projects.
Failure = punishment
Achievement = rewards
Continually trying to educate a volatile board to the policy setting role
Selects "experts" to be on the board to set general operating policies.
Operations geared towards efficiency
Operations geared towards effectiveness
Top management evaluated by dramatic and visible elements.
Top management evaluated by overall effectiveness.
(Alexander Performance Management, Inc. 2004; Lachman 1985).
In a sense, the above shows us that some of the differences between public and private sector accounting are in both the way information is reported and the manner in which information is used to further the goals of the organization. There are differing levels of expectation within the Australian culture, particularly in dealing with public sector accountancy. For instance, in recent years, there has been a great deal of pressure on all levels of government to improve performance in health, employment, social welfare, and educational programs. For the last few decades, though, performance measures have been used primarily as an internal tool to gauge the effectiveness of their own particular foray into public policy. However, increased attention on performance evaluations by public sector managers and academics brought greater attention to both the management end and access to programs that would require compliance and evaluation in a more transparent manner. In terms of the public sector in Australia, then, we find that there are five major concerns: 1) How does the government appraise and establish performance within the "new" public sector environment; 2) How is performance measured and reported when dealing with the specific organization; 3) What are the key elements of performance measurement and reporting within Australia's public sector; 4) In addition to economic efficiency measures, does performance measurement cover all appropriate social and environmental issues? And, 5) How effective are performance measures that are being used? (Hoque & Adams 2008).
In Australia, specifically, there has also been a merging of public and private accounting in the sense of following certain ethical guidelines and accountability arragnements. Financing arrangements tend to dominate the classification, as well as the issue of whether the government retains a…[continue]
"Management Account In The Public Sector And" (2012, May 31) Retrieved October 22, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/management-account-in-the-public-sector-80229
"Management Account In The Public Sector And" 31 May 2012. Web.22 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/management-account-in-the-public-sector-80229>
"Management Account In The Public Sector And", 31 May 2012, Accessed.22 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/management-account-in-the-public-sector-80229
Organizational Change in the Public Sector This research proposal explores the feasibility of management in the public Sector as an organizational paradigm and new model in organizational development. The literature review reviews numerous journal articles that explore on the key concepts of change management strategies from a public sector project management perspective. The authors suggest that employee's participation, effective feedback across the board, and empowerment of subordinate staffs is a major
Retrieved at http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/EROPA/UNPAN014284.pdf. Accessed on 30 May, 2005 Pearson Des. 2000. "Contemporary Issues in Public Sector Accountability: New Challenges for Accountability." 22 January. Retrieved at http://www.audit.wa.gov.au/pubs/ipaa23022000.html. Accessed on 30 May, 2005 Setting the Course: Integrating Conformance with Performance." 2000. September, 7. Retrieved at http://www.ag.gov.au/agd/WWW/attorneygeneralHome.nsf/Page/Speeches_2000_Speeches_Setting_the_Course:_Integrating_Conformance_with_PerformanceAccessed on 30 May, 2005 Sozzani, Joseph "Privatization in the United States and Australia: A Comparative Analysis of the Modern Movement in Corrections." Retrieved at http://www.bond.edu.au/law/blr/vol13-1/Sozzani.pdf. Accessed on 30
Public Private Comparator Public Sector Comparator (PSC) in the Public-private partnership (PPP) Process Increased global financial pressures have caused many government entities to cut costs in any way possible. One way is to outsource services or projects to private companies. However, when comparing costs, the public sector frequently bases its cost calculations for a project by omitting certain types of factors. These can include employee benefits, utilities, or total administrative costs. As
Auditing function has undergone several transformations from the periods when it was simply a function of giving opinion but also to an error where auditors are looked upon to offer advisory roles. The auditors should therefore advice the government on the impacts of their operations on the public and on other improvements that can be made to maximize on the service delivery. In pursuing their taxation policies and fiscal
Notes On Public Sector Reform and Performance Managementa Australia 1997. Sector Management Act Review Report, viewed 2 October 2005. http://www.dpc.wa.gov.au/psmd/pubs/exec/machgovt/kelly/summary.pdf] Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) 2001, Publlic sector leadership for the 21st Century, OECD, Paris. Pollitt, C 2003, The essential public manager, Open University Press, Maidenhead. Shergold, Peter 2004, Australian Public Sector Governance: Speech at CCH Manual Launch. Viewed 2 October 2005. http://www.pmc.gov.au/speeches/shergold/public_sector_governance_2004-08-05.cfm Sethi, D 1999, 'leading from the middle', Human Resource
Complexity Theory in the Public Sector The objective of this work is to examine complexity theory in the public sector. According to Paul Cairney in the work entitled "Complexity Theory in Public Policy" the term complexity "has relevance to a wide range of theories in public policy which describe the replacement of the simple "clubby days' of early post-war politics by complex relationships at multiple levels of government and among a
CBVH then continues to work with VESID to assess performance on an ongoing basis, participate in on-site reviews, and provide technical assistance or recommend adjustments to contracts as needed. In the near century that these agencies have been in place, they have worked together in their efforts to assist those with disabilities to find employment. The current supported employment delivery system has allowed all eligible individuals with the most significant