Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
The question is raised as to which values to select over others. The combination of references to substitution also serves to make the point that making choices and choosing one thing over another is unavoidable.
This unavoidable nature relates to the fact that substitution is part of society. We also see where substitution is of benefit to a person. Elbow is one example, he owes his job to substitution, as he says "as they are chosen, they are glad to choose me for them." (II.i) This leads to one of the themes of the play, corruption, a theme that touches on substitution.
In fact there are many themes of the play that relate to substitution. Some of the themes are a choice between two things, where one must be substituted by the other. Action vs. words is one example. This theme is especially important as it also relates to the nature of appearances, in that what appears is not always actual. The Duke is one example, he announces that he will be leaving the city but sneaks back in disguise. This relates to another theme, appearance vs. reality. Angelo appears to be a good man, but we find that he is not. Disguise is another theme, where disguise can be seen as substituting the real person for another. The Duke takes on a disguise as the Friar. While this is an obvious disguise there are also the less obvious. Angelo is disguised as a good man, in the end he is shown not to be. It is significant that it is the Duke's disguise that is the downfall of Angelo's. This suggests that it is in the purpose of the disguise that the importance lies. Manipulation is also a key component in the play, manipulation is the reason for the events of the play. Without it Claudio would have died, Angelo would have remained unexposed, and Mariana would not have gotten married. Manipulation is in itself a substitution, the process of substituting what is real for that the manipulator wants you to believe.
In the play manipulation is not a bad thing, disguise is for the Duke but not for Angelo, reality is seen to triumph over appearances in the end and action is seen to triumph over words. All of these themes relate back to substitution, the difficulty is that the combination of many similar themes leaves the audience with no clear meaning as to the nature of substitution. Just as in the play and in life itself, the choice is not clear.
This is what the play is all about, the nature of choices. Deciding one thing means another is not chosen, so making a choice is a matter of substitution. In the play, the characters have difficult choices to make. Angelo decides the fate of Claudio, and condemns him to death. Isabella decides whether it is more important to save a life or save a soul. The play is also about the choice between mercy and justice. Isabella becomes the symbol of mercy when she pleads for Angelo, the man who tried to seduce her and who condemned her brother. In a similar fashion, the Duke also reveals his mercy when he pardons Claudio, Lucio, and Angelo. The Duke feels he hands out appropriate justice based on the nature of the crime, measure for measure. It is this that sums up the nature of the play, measure for measure. Each character is doled out what they gave out. In the end it is not a question of society, but a question of each character.
The same thing can be understood when we compare the Duke and Angelo. The Duke takes on a disguise and this disguise becomes the downfall of Angelo's disguise. The meaning here can be interpreted as showing that it is what is inside a man that is important and that nothing can disguise a person's character. The true meaning of the play may be that measure for measure, what you get is based on what you are and nothing can substitute for that.
Brown, Donohue, Axnick, Blount, Ewen, Jones. Syphilis and Other Venereal Diseases. Harvard University Press. Cambridge Massachusetts, 1970.
Rosebury, Theodor. Microbes and Morals. The Viking Press. New York, 1971.[continue]
"Measure For Measure We See" (2002, February 18) Retrieved October 21, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/measure-for-we-ee-55736
"Measure For Measure We See" 18 February 2002. Web.21 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/measure-for-we-ee-55736>
"Measure For Measure We See", 18 February 2002, Accessed.21 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/measure-for-we-ee-55736
Shakespeare's Measure For Measure William Shakespeare's play, Measure for Measure is considered a problem play because it operates on several levels. Shakespeare explores complex matters of ethics in this play through complicated situations and characters. The complexities of the human psyche are explored in this play, with a focus on the emotions of love, shame, and honor. Shakespeare brings these sensitive issues to the surface with the characters and curious behavior
We see that convential agriculture often fails in the long-run. Rather than substitue ecosystem functions with chemicals, does it not make more sense to use the ecological functions of the area in question to "develop farming styles tailored to [the] specific agroexosystems and socioeconomic capabilities"? (Holt, p. 39). And what better way to ensure that we provide the world with the most production possible in a way that benefits
people generally think that we can detach ourselves from the world around us and objectively evaluate and reason through our experiences. This is the classical line of thought initially proposed by philosophers such as Aristotle, Socrates, and, later, Descartes who fashioned his Cartesian principle to the purpose that we can step back, evaluate our internalized knowledge, think it through and from thence, decide which to accept, which to erase
S.S.R., which would ostensibly eliminate the threat posed by the U.S.S.R.'s capabilities. The report takes on a tone almost encouraging that to happen. It was very much the public mood of the time that would have supported that initiative. That the world came so close to the use of nuclear confrontation during the Cuban Missile Crisis is indicative of this, and it was only the ability of JFK to resist
The job of therapy is in no small part to help individuals push back about over-simplification. Behind the comedy in this movie -- and it is a very funny movie -- is the recognition that much of what makes us miserable in our lives is the fact that we find ourselves limited in our sense of Self by the categories that other people bring to bear on us. And the
Proust and Narrativity We read Marcel Proust's In Search of Lost Time - that greatest work of his the title of which is more commonly translated as Remembrance of Things Past both because of the simple beauty of his language and because of the power that he has to find our own lost pieces of time. For while he makes us interested in his past because of his marvelous descriptions of
However, because it was so uncommon, it was a big deal. Wheatley was accused of "acting white'" (Gates), according to Gates, and this accusation was along the same vein as "getting straight A's, or even visiting the Smithsonian" (Gates), Gates reports. The irony is palpable and Gates puts it succinctly when he says, "we have moved from a situation where Phillis Wheatley's acts of literacy could be used to