Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
The result is that the minarets which are more probably rooted in the experiences, technologies and impulses of the now extinct Byzantines are part of the religious iconography of both ancient and modern Islamic culture.
That said, the eventuality by which the Byzantine identity was erased from formal existence would have a significant bearing on the emergence of a yet more self-aware Islamic architectural philosophy. Garber indicates that we may draw a separation -- though it is not entirely clear where to draw this from a chronological perspective -- between the period of transition and the period by which the Islamic leadership had begun to seek out a more pointedly Islamic ideology. In other words, the goals of repurposing eventually began to recede as Muslim architects sought new ways of targeting its proposed functions. Accordingly, Grabar tells that of some of the artifacts left behind from succeeding generations of Umayyad rulership, we may deduce a concerted effort to be distinguished from these forms. Grabar indicates of palatial estates to Arab rulers in particular, "while most of the architectural components of these palaces and many of the habits of life enjoyed in them find parallels in the Mediterranean tradition, the specific combination of functions illustrated by the palaces cannot be explained as a Byzantine Christian type modified by various characteristics of a new taste. For, except for a few depictions on mosaics in North Africa, there is no evidence that the combinations of forms and purposes which appear in Umayyad palaces were characteristic of secular architecture of the Near East before the Muslim conquest." (p. 77)
This denotes an important consideration though. Grabar reveals a degree of historiography which influences the whole of our discussion and determines how much we know and how much has been left to speculation. Namely, we are given a great deal of concrete evidence of the connection between the Islamic identity -- a thriving world culture -- that is not available to us with respect to the fallen Roman Empire and its Byzantine incarnation. Therefore, Grabar warns that "in the cities, then, one may assume a continuation of older patterns of life and construction, with the addition of only a few new architectural compositions serving precise new needs but without as yet the use of many new forms or techniques; it is probably only the mood of the cities which changed but this mood cannot be reconstructed with the evidence in our possession." (p. 74)
And herein rests the broader challenge of this discussion. Namely, we are left to assess the conditions defining a transition period which may have truly taken place over several centuries. From the integration of Byzantine architectural values into the Arab landscape to the revelations that forged an inseparable link between Islamic faith and Arab culture, pieces of cultural experience would be gathered to formulate a new and self-perpetuating identity. The palaces, garrisons and mosques that are left behind -- and indeed those that are constructed today -- imply a pointedly Islamic symbology but our findings suggest that this was not conceived with the same immediacy as the visions of the Prophet Mohammed. Instead, the immediacy of Mohammed's prophecies would make it necessary for the burgeoning Islamic movement to take on the forms of the existing order and mold them to serve its purposes. The lasting connection between these forms and the Islamic identity is sufficient evidence that they succeeded dramatically in this objective. Moreover, the evolution of Islamic architecture over the succeeding years would suggest the Byzantine innovations to be largely a jumping off point for a culture with its own importance to the development of current world civilization. In both the transition between the two Empires and in the effort of the Islamic Empire thereafter to cast its own legacy, we can seen the reciprocity between culture, hegemony, geography and architecture.
Ettinghausen, R.; Grabar, O. & Jenkins-Madina, M. (2003). Islamic Art and Architecture 650-1250. Yale University Press.
Golombek, L. (1988). The Draped Universe of Islam. Colloquium in Memory of Richard Ettinghausen: New York University.
Grabar, O. (1964). Islamic Art and the Byzantium. Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 18, 67-88.
Ismail, O.S.A. (1968). The Founding…[continue]
"Medieval Islamic Art The Transition" (2010, October 16) Retrieved December 9, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/medieval-islamic-art-the-transition-7684
"Medieval Islamic Art The Transition" 16 October 2010. Web.9 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/medieval-islamic-art-the-transition-7684>
"Medieval Islamic Art The Transition", 16 October 2010, Accessed.9 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/medieval-islamic-art-the-transition-7684
20,21). Romanesque structures tend to be dark and cave-like on the inside. Arches became pointed, rather than rounded as in Roman structures. Gothic architecture represents an advancement in engineering techniques, as builders found that they could do with thinner materials and that roofs could span greater distances. The roofs in Gothic architecture was supported by this new form of arch, rather than by the massive walls, as was done
New scholarship suggests that Byzantine Empire was as successful as was Rome in shaping modern Europe (Angelov, 2001). Islamic Golden Age The Islamic Golden Age (also called the Caliphate of Islam or the Islamic Renaissance) was a center of government and political, cultural and religious traditions that arose in the early 6th century AD from the teachings of the Prophet Mohammed and reached its height between the 8th to 13th centuries
Thomas Aquinas led the move away from the Platonic and Augustinian and toward Aristotelianism and "developed a philosophy of mind by writing that the mind was at birth a tabula rasa ('blank slate') that was given the ability to think and recognize forms or ideas through a divine spark" (Haskins viii). By 1200 there were reasonably accurate Latin translations of the main works of Aristotle, Euclid, Ptolemy, Archimedes, and
Western Civilization From Prehistory to the Renaissance Early Civilizations What do historians mean by "pre-history?" What was life like for early humans during these years? There are many things that we as citizens of the modern world take for granted. First among these is probably the enormous amount of recorded information that we have at our fingertips. Everything from our purchases, to our places of employment, to the times and places of our births
Another notable development and contribution of ancient from Greek is the Olympics. The event was begun in Greek as an entertainment session but later evolved into an international event. Additional invention of Greek is the architecture. The Greek were immensely talented in art and, therefore, the exemplary architectural inventions and developments in the modern world today. They all can trace the history of the building system in this ancient
Romanesque and Gothic Architecture There were a number of changes that happened to Romanesque architecture to make it uniquely Gothic. Romanesque architecture was principally that for churches, whereas Gothic architecture manifested itself in cathedrals. The difference between these two is not mere diction; Romanesque churches had thicker walls and were darker and on the whole smaller than Gothic cathedrals, which encompassed a number of structural innovations to make them extremely vertical,
William of Occam formulated the principle of Occam's Razor, which held that the simplest theory that matched all the known facts was the correct one. At the University of Paris, Jean Buridan questioned the physics of Aristotle and presaged the modern scientific ideas of Isaac Newton and Galileo concerning gravity, inertia and momentum when he wrote: ...after leaving the arm of the thrower, the projectile would be moved by an impetus