Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
National Response Framework Incident Annexes
Timely responses to natural and manmade disasters require the effective coordination of numerous federal, state and local resources. Indeed, effective responses can make the difference between life and death for countless citizens, and there is therefore a need for a framework to coordinate these disparate but valuable first responder resources. In this regard, the National Response Framework provides such a framework, but given the enormous range of providers that are involved, it is not surprising that the framework is also lengthy and complex. Moreover, the NRF recently superseded the National Response Plan (NRP) and provided a number of incident annexes concerning optimal contingency or hazard situation responses. To gain additional insights into the provisions of these annexes, this paper provides a summary of the annexes to the NRF, followed by recapitulation of the research and important findings in the conclusion.
Summary of National Response Framework Annexes
Incident Annex Introduction
The Federal Emergency Management Administration's (FEMA) National Response Plan Resource Center reports that the Incident Annexes provide guidance concerning the responses needed to address specific contingency or hazard situations or an element of an incident requiring specialized application of the NRF (Incident annexes, 2012). The NRF Resource Center also advises the Incident Annexes summarized below were updated and now supersede the December 2004 versions.
This annex is used to define the respective responsibilities, actions and roles for responses that specifically involve human disease outbreaks of communicable and non- communicable nature attributable to either natural or mandate sources of unknown origin that require federal assistance; the annex notes that incidents restricted to animal, plant, or food health or safety are addressed in other annexes. The steps outlined in this annex can be taken in the absence of a Presidential Stafford Act declaration or a public health emergency declaration by the Secretary of Health and Human Services and provides guidance concerning biological incident response actions such as (a) threat assessment notification procedures, (b) laboratory testing, (c) joint investigative/response procedures, and (d) activities related to recovery (Biological incident annex, 2012).
This annex sets forth the various strategies that will be employed for the implementation and coordination of an efficient, forward-looking national-level response to catastrophic incidents; however, the preface to this annex also notes that additional and more detailed guidance is provided separately in a supplement to the NRF (Catastrophic incident annex, 2012). The annex, though, does emphasize the potential impact of catastrophic incidents and the disruption that such events could have at the national level, making the need for an efficient and coordinated response paramount (Catastrophic incident annex, 2012)
This annex is intended to provide relevant policies, actions and responsibilities required to respond to cyber-related events that have national implications. The annex sets forth the coordinated responses from federal, state, local, tribal and private-sector partners. This annex is based on the National Cyberspace Security Response System which is published separately (Cyber incident annex, 2012).
Food and Agriculture Incident
This annex codifies the respective roles and responsibilities of agencies responding to food and agriculture-related incidents at the national level. The annex sets forth the key principles that will guide such responses and establishes protocols to be followed in a coordinated federal response to such incidents. As with biological responses, the annex states that responses to food and agriculture incidents may also be taken in the absence of a Stafford Act Presidential declaration or a public health emergency declaration by the Secretary of Health and Human Services or an emergency declaration by the Secretary of Agriculture (Food and agriculture incident annex, 2012).
Mass Evacuation Incident
This annex sets forth the NRF guidelines for responsible agencies, their respective roles and responsibilities as well as relevant guidelines concerning optimal integrated responses by federal, states, local, and tribal resources. The annex contains five main parts: (a) the criteria under which federal support to mass evacuations is provided; (b) a concept of operations for federal-level mass evacuation support; (c) the agencies and organizations involved in a federally supported mass evacuation; (d) the roles and responsibilities of federal entities in planning, preparing for, and conducting mass evacuations in support of state, tribal, and local authorities; and (e) guidelines to improve coordination among federal, State, tribal, and local authorities when federal evacuation support is required. (Mass evacuation incident annex, 2012).
"National Response Framework Incident Annexes Timely Responses" (2012, February 15) Retrieved November 29, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/national-response-framework-incident-annexes-54262
"National Response Framework Incident Annexes Timely Responses" 15 February 2012. Web.29 November. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/national-response-framework-incident-annexes-54262>
"National Response Framework Incident Annexes Timely Responses", 15 February 2012, Accessed.29 November. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/national-response-framework-incident-annexes-54262
Emergency Response Plan- Non-Government Entities FEMA makes it very clear in their National Readiness Report that the Red Cross plays a critical role in assisting communities during a disaster. Not only are funds donated and distributed to aid families, but the Red Cross further aids by providing medical care, food, clothing, and housing to disaster victims. Even during some of the greatest disasters, including September 11th and some of the most
S. history such as Hurricane Andrew and the Northridge earthquake. Post-9/11 infrastructure protection investments have focused on increasing the security of infrastructure, not in increasing its resilience." (p. 258) Certainly, these breakdowns are an indication that many of the interagency strategies brought to bear in the discussion on public administration had not been executed effectively, especially those intended to coalesce under the roof of the Department of Homeland Security. A quick
air traffic has continued to increase and it now constitutes a considerable proportion of the travelling public. The amount of long-hour flights has increased significantly. Based on the International Civil Aviation authority, air traffic can be anticipated to double amid till 2020. Airline travel, especially over longer distances, makes air travelers vulnerable to numerous facets that will impact their health and well-being. Particularly, the speed with which influenza spreads
Manmade or natural disasters frequently require a timely and coordinated response that may include federal, state and local resources. When a disaster rises to the level of a threat to the national interests, the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Emergency Support Functions are activated. This paper provides a discussion concerning Public Safety Security Annex (ESF-13), including its origin and scope, as well as participants and the operational response to a critical
Emergency, Planning and Operations Methodology The Department of Homeland Security is fully aware of the importance of local and state first responders. Currently managed under the Department of Justice, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency and other various offices, local firefighters, state and local law enforcement, and local emergency medical personnel would be subject to the Department of Homeland Security's authority (http://www.whitehouse.gov/deptofhomeland/sect4.html).Moreover, the Department
Of course, it becomes a very difficult matter to overcome sparse levels of availability when they are encountered (e.g. In the more remote regions of Western Australia). Taken together, the issues suggest that the impact of availability policy on the use of alcohol may be as heterogeneous as patterns of availability themselves. The reduction of one outlet in an urban area has significantly different meaning and implications than the reduction
The third position means stepping outside the situation and seeing issues from the point-of-view of a third party. NLP reminds us that people receive information in various sensory channels: the visual, the auditory, the kinaesthetic (perception of movement of effort) and the digital mathematical or reasoned thinking (Taylor, 2000). The idea being that people use all of these modes, but may have a preferred mode. Ethnographic approach: this takes its