Niebuhr Reinhold Niebuhr if There Research Paper

Download this Research Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Research Paper:

" (Bains)

World War II had a tremendous impact on Reinhold Niebuhr and his theological thinking. In light of the actions of Hitler and the Japanese, his "Christian Realism" theory forced him to re-examine many of his previous views on the world. Niebuhr severed all socialist connections after Hitler and Stalin signed a non-aggression pact in 1939 and was a staunch supporter of America's entry into the war. He viewed sin as part of the world, felt it was more important to have justice in the world than universal love, felt the pacifist movement was unable to stop sin in the world, and that power could be balanced by power. He criticized the members of the pacifist movement for using intellectual arguments to respond to real threats. He claimed that the pacifist and non-interventionists "…shrouded the conflict in an ambiguity that operatively established a 'moral equivalency' between Nazism and the admitted flawed democracies." (Bullert) the United States, Allies, and other democracies represented the hope for the human race, that they would counter the evils of the world. He proposed realistic answers for the complicated issues confronting the world at that time.

After the war. Reinhold Niebuhr focused his attention on ethical meaning of American History. His 1952 book "The Irony of American History" took a hard, ethical look at the history of the United States. His interpretation of American history determined that liberal democracy was a better method of creating common good than Marxism, and that "…on the whole, [American government] is expected to gain its ends by moral attraction and limitation." (Berke) He criticized "American Idealism" as either pro-war imperialism, or anti-war non-interventionism. The pro-war crowd, he argued, viewed power as a virtue, while the anti-war movement was embarrassed by power. Niebuhr concluded that there were two major ironies concerning the United States; that the United States has acquired a great deal of power without actively seeking it, and that possessing such power come with it global responsibilities which limit the United States ability to control it's own destiny. (Berke)

It may seem strange that a person who spent his entire life working of the good of society would endorse segregation, but that is exactly what Reinhold Niebuhr did. Believing that the solutions to social evils should evolve in society, he viewed segregation as a pragmatic solution to a complicated problem, that forced integration would cause violence, and it was better to be equal but separate. However, by the late 1960's the realities of the social situation in America forced him to again re-evaluate some of his basic beliefs. He came to the conclusion that society was never going to be able to actually accomplish "separate but equal," and that forced integration was the only way to alleviate social ills. (Fox) He also opposed American involvement in Vietnam claiming that the United States was acting in a "power is virtue" way ultimately which would lead to disaster.

Reinhold Niebuhr has been one of the 20th century's most influential thinkers and his influence can be seen throughout American theological thought, politics, and social causes. His "neo-orthodoxy" has become the absorbed into modern Protestant theological thought, while his "Christian realism" has become the basis of political discourse in the nation. The "Catholic Liberal Theology" of Central and South America can trace it's roots back to Niebuhr's teachings, as well as social movements such as Feminism, Gay Rights, and the Ecological Movement. In terms of American politics, both John McCain and Barack Obama took occasion in their 2008 campaigns to associate themselves with the teachings of Niebuhr; as many politicians have done. Although Reinhold Niebuhr died on June 1st, 1971 in Stockbridge, Massachusetts, he lives on through his works and continues to influence American society.


Bains, David R. "Conduits of Faith: Reinhold Niebuhr's Liturgical Thought." Church

History 73.01 (2004): 168. Print.

Berke, Matthew. "Print Edition | First Things." Home | First Things. 03 Mar. 2000. Web

01 Mar. 2011.

Bullert, Gary B. "Reinhold Niebuhr and the Christian Century: World War II and the Eclipse of the Social Gospel | Journal of Church and State | Find Articles at BNET. "Find Articles at BNET | News Articles, Magazine Back Issues & Reference Articles on All Topics." Web. 03 Mar. 2011

Fox, Richard Wightman. Reinhold Niebuhr: a Biography. San Francisco: Harper & Rowe, 1987. Print.

"Reinhold Niebuhr."…[continue]

Cite This Research Paper:

"Niebuhr Reinhold Niebuhr If There" (2011, March 04) Retrieved November 29, 2016, from

"Niebuhr Reinhold Niebuhr If There" 04 March 2011. Web.29 November. 2016. <>

"Niebuhr Reinhold Niebuhr If There", 04 March 2011, Accessed.29 November. 2016,

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Niebuhr Christ and Culture

    Niebuhr Material Niebuhr, H. Richard. Christ and Culture. New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1951. The author of Christ and Culture Richard Niebuhr is today largely remembered as one-half a famous pair of siblings. Reinhold was the more famous of the two Niebuhr brothers, but both Niebuhrs redefined Protestant theology for the 20th century. While his brother Reinhold described himself as a devout Lutheran, Richard Niebuhr was "more inclined toward Augustinian, Calvinistic

  • How Important Was Neo Orthodoxy in the 20th Century

    Neo-Orthodoxy The term "neo-orthodoxy" refers to a 20th century movement among Protestant theologians -- in the United States and in Europe -- that emerged following the bloody carnage of World War I. The disillusionment that several Christian theologians -- and millions of others impacted by the War -- experienced led to a rejection of the liberal Christian movement which had urged the adaptation of an ongoing sense of optimism that seemed

  • American Religious History Defining Fundamentalism and Liberalism

    American Religious History Defining fundamentalism and liberalism in Christianity is hardly an exact science, especially because prior to about 1920 there was not even a term for fundamentalism as it exists today. While present-day fundamentalists often claim descent from the Puritans and Calvinists of the 17th and 18th Centuries, Puritans were not really fundamentalists in the modern sense. They were not in conflict with 20th Century-style liberals and supporters of evolution

  • Strategic Security in the Middle

    Of the six conflicts (within the fifty mentioned) that resulted in 200,000 or more deaths, three were between Muslims and non-Muslims, two were between Muslim cultures, and just one involved non-Muslims on both sides. The author references a New York Times investigative piece in which fifty-nine ethnic conflicts were reported in forty-eight locations in 1993. In "half these places Muslims were clashing with other Muslims or with non-Muslims"; in thirty-nine

  • Conflict There Is a Difference

    The Palestinians have never the Jewish version of history and desire to have all the land returned to them. This conflict is intractable and there is little hope of a resolution in the immediate future. In applying Reinhold Niebuhr's Christian realism to the conflict summarized above it should be noted that Niebuhr was a Zionist who strongly supported the right of Israel to occupy the land and defend itself. His

  • Bush v Obama Foreign Policies

    The administration's disregard for international norms led to the excesses at Abu Ghraib Prison in Iraq, and attempts to circumvent congressional oversight over the activities of the Administration backfired. Faced with increasing criticism at home and the inability to stabilize Iraq, the Bush Administration began to temper its approach with realism. The Administration agreed to a bipartisan Iraq Study Group, led by former Secretary of State James Baker and

  • Applying Servant Leadership Within a

    Initially, I had to point out when people were saying things that would indicate a connection between group members. However, once those connections were established, the group members moved rather rapidly towards directly relating with one another. Another result of the group meetings is that the group members initially appeared very focused on the past. Small groups tend to do postmortems of old failures, archaeologizing (digging in the past for

Read Full Research Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved