Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
Nursing Shortage: Its Effect on Patient Outcome
In today's environment of rising costs in the health care industry, one of the first casualties in many hospitals is the level of RN staffing. In fact, across the country, hospital RNs are increasingly forced to work in an atmosphere in which they are understaffed, overworked, and charged with responsibilities wholly unrelated to direct patient care. This is a phenomenon illustrated in alarming detail in the article "Identifying Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcome Relationships: A Guide for Change in Care Delivery," published in the July-August, 2003 issue of Nursing Economics, in which a solid connection between inadequate RN staffing and negative patient outcomes is presented.
Most RN's are acutely aware of the negative repercussions they experience personally as a result of understaffing -- particularly in acute health care units. Most also realize that this understaffing is the result of the popular administrative notion that the higher the RN percentage in any given facility, the higher hospital costs rise (Potter, Barr, McSweeney, Sledge, 2003). Although, it is true that higher RN concentrations in any given facility must necessarily increase cost in the short-term, there remains the question of whether, in consideration of the detrimental effect reductions in RN staffing has on patient outcome, the current definition of "cost" is one-dimensional.
Although it is tempting to fall into the trap of weighing, perhaps, too heavily on financial considerations in hospital policy decisions, particularly concerning RN staffing, the nature of the hospital as a "caring" institution must be upheld. Not only is this absolutely essential in defending the quality of health care offered to patients, but it is also ultimately more cost effective in reducing the very real financial repercussions that arise out of negative patient outcomes -- which include factors such as "measures of patient falls, medication errors, self-reported symptom management, self-care and health status, and post-discharge patient satisfaction ((Potter, Barr, McSweeney, Sledge)." After all, were one to factor in the higher costs associated with medication errors, medical complications resulting from inadequate care (pressure ulcers, falls), as well as possible legal action leveled by disgruntled patients (again, to say nothing of the moral and ethical implications), the actual financial benefit of reduced RN staffing may be very different, indeed.
However, it is tempting to question whether these so called "negative patient outcomes," described in the Nursing Economics article previously mentioned, are even related to the ratio of RN to patient in any particular unit. After all, many might argue that it is highly possible that most negative patient outcomes are more a result of the individual patient's medical condition than levels of nursing care. For example, a study referenced in the Nursing Economics article (Reed, Blegen, and Goode, 1998), came to the conclusion that the "adverse occurrences typically measured as clinical outcomes (for example, medication errors, pressure ulcer rates, and falls) may reflect the severity of patients' conditions rather than the quality of nursing care (Potter, Barr, McSweeney, Sledge)." While it is true that it is particularly difficult to attribute a cause and effect relationship between any two variables in a multi-variable situation, the strength of the Reed, Blegen and Good study seems to put this question to rest.
Understanding that a causal relationship between nurse staffing and patient outcome was under question, Potter, Barr, McSweeney, and Sledge sought to clarify the relationship between the two variables in their study. According to the authors:
The purposes of the main study were to determine baseline values of patient outcome measures and the relationship of nurse staffing at the unit level to patient outcomes in the acute care, inpatient setting, while adjusting for acuity level and percentage of float nurses on the unit. The findings regarding outcome measures would serve as a baseline for evaluating changes in care delivery to be undertaken within the hospital (Potter, Barr, McSweeney, and Sledge).
Further, the study authors defined the term "outcome" specifically as follows:
Outcome are what happens to the patient [including] the patient's health status, functional status, quality of life or the presence or absence of disease (Mitchell, 1993) The American Nurses Association (ANA) (1995) defines quality with three-tier model that include patient-focused outcome indicators (for example, how patients' conditions are affected by their interactions with nursing staff), process of care indicators (for example, nursing satisfaction), and structure of care indicators (for example, staffing patters) (Potter, Barr, McSweeney, and Sledge).
This definition of patient outcome is particularly important in that it can be interpreted as a concept in any number of ways. Therefore, in response to this issue, the study authors specifically defined "patient outcome" as above, while specifically selecting those outcome indicators that most lend themselves to statistical analysis. In short, they found that adverse events, measured by the "fall index" and the "medication errors" index, inpatient self-reports (in which patients reported symptom management, self-care, and health status), collected by means of the Eight Visual Analog Scale, or VAS, as well as a "excellent to poor" five point scaled question regarding the patient's perception of overall health would be the most "data friendly" aspects to consider.
In all, the study included a total of 3,418 patients. They were questioned concerning their overall "satisfaction," based on "communication, respect, coordination of care, nursing care, discharge process, advocation, and patient compassionate care (Potter, Barr, McSweeney, and Sledge). They also measured staffing data, as well as levels of patient acuity (and adjusted the data distribution according to float percentages and acuity). The outcome was striking and definitive.
Overall, the study found:
The percentage of RN hours negatively correlated with patient pain and self-care ability...in other words, the higher the percentage of hours of nursing care provided by RNs, the lower level of pain perceived by patients, the better the patient's perception of self-care ability and health status, and the greater the patients' satisfaction post-discharge.
Further, although the study did not find that there was a correlation between RN staffing and the medication and fall indices, the study did find that, "Total hours of nursing care per patient day were negatively correlated with patient distress, willingness and ability to care for self, the indexes of symptom management and self-care, and the fall index," therefore, the larger the amount of nursing hours "by all categories of nursing personnel are associated with less patient distress, fewer problems with symptom management," falls, and successful self-care.
Interestingly, the findings of this study closely mirror another study focusing on virtually the same topic, described in the JONA article, "The Relationship Between Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcomes." (2003) In this study, conducted by Sacichay-Akkadachanunt, Scalzi, and Jawad, the question was similarly raised, considering patient outcome (in this case, specifically morality), and nurse staffing variables (ratio of nursing staff to patient, proportion of RNs in the nursing staff, the level of RN experience in mean years, and the overall percentage of BS in nursing degrees).
The reason that this article is interesting is not only because the outcome seems to closely relate to the previous study, but that it seems to indicate the universality of the negative relationship between high patient to nurse ratios and patient outcomes (represented by mortality) across cultural and national lines (the study was conducted in Thailand). Specifically, the study found that, based on the nursing staff variables used in the study:
the ratio of total nurse staffing to patients was significantly related to in- hospital mortality in both partial and marginal analyses, controlling for patient characteristics. In addition, the ratio of total nursing staff to patients was found to be the best predictor of in-hospital mortality among the four nurse staffing variables
Not only did the above study's conclusions, "add to our understanding of the importance of nurse staffing and its relationship to the patient outcome of hospital mortality," (perhaps the most "extreme" embodiment of negative patient outcome) but it also gives significant support to the idea that reductions in nurse and RN staffing may reduce cost, yet have significant negative effects on patient outcome -- all the way up to the level of increased incidence of hospital mortality (recall, also adjusted for patient characteristics).
If, then, this is the case, and the reduction in nursing staff results in negative patient outcomes (even if adjusted for compounding variables), why are nursing staffs continually downsized and padded with relatively unskilled "unlicensed assistive personnel," or UAPs? After all, according to the Thailand study, which cited the logic of the American Nurses Association:
When there is adequate staff, nurses can spend more time with each patient in every aspect of patient care, while time constraints can increase the probability of mistakes my creating a busy, stressful environment with distractions and interruptions that adversely affect quality of care (Sacichay-Akkadachanunt, Scalzi, and Jawad).
Although, previous to these studies, many would assert that such a statement made by the American Nurses Association might be imbibed with significant amounts of self-interest, the outcomes of both "Identifying Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcome Relationships: A Guide for Change in Care Delivery," as well as…[continue]
"Nursing Shortage And Patient Outcome" (2004, April 22) Retrieved October 21, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/nursing-shortage-and-patient-outcome-170165
"Nursing Shortage And Patient Outcome" 22 April 2004. Web.21 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/nursing-shortage-and-patient-outcome-170165>
"Nursing Shortage And Patient Outcome", 22 April 2004, Accessed.21 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/nursing-shortage-and-patient-outcome-170165
Picot Statement P: Nurses and Nursing. Nursing leadership and patient outcome Review of studies and literature that examine the association and relationship between nursing leadership practices and patient outcomes. O: Evidence suggests relationships between positive relational leadership styles and higher patient satisfaction and lower patient mortality, medication errors, sentinel events, and hospital-acquired infections. Over three months Healthcare faces an economic downturn, stressful work environments, upcoming retirements of leaders and projected workforce shortages, implementing strategies to ensure
Nursing and Patient Outcomes Identify one area of nursing research that has improved patient outcomes. State the study and its impact on patient care. How have these findings changed your nursing practice? As the field of nursing research continues to expand, the potential for improving patient outcomes has increased exponentially, with enhancements to efficiency and methodological innovation combining to provide modern nurses with an array of advantages. One area of nursing research
1%." (AACN, 2008) VII. Negative Affects of Nursing Shortage on Patient Care Study findings indicate that a connection exists between adequate nursing staffing and patient care and specifically state in the findings of the latest studies published in the journals of Health Services Research (August 2008) and the Journal of Nursing Administration (May 2008) are findings that confirm previous study findings linking education level and patient outcomes. This indicates that "…efforts to
Nursing Shortage Background and Current Reality The shortage of nursing staff in the workforce has become a global crisis. Numerous research articles and even books have been written on the subject from all around the world, all giving causal factors and possible solutions. As far back as 2002, "90 nurses' organizations, representing 69 countries and every geographic region of the world, reported shortages in their countries" (Clark & Clark, 2003). Moreover, the
Nursing Staff Levels Affect Patient Mortality Managing unnecessary variability in patient demand to reduce nursing stress and improve patient safety. Litvak, E., Buerhaus, P.I., Davidoff, F., Long, M.C., McManus, M.L. & Berwick, D.M. Date of publication: June 2005 Examination of the operational issues affecting health care delivery, including patient driven peaks in demand and effects of nursing shortages or inadequate staffing on clinical outcomes for patients. Research question and/or hypothesis: In this study the researchers
Institutions may have to devote more resources to improving the workplace for nurses, and make cutbacks in other areas, so patient care is not compromised. Addressing the nursing deficit from the perspective of nursing schools, rather than simply offering more money to nursing has been one strategy deployed by the state of Florida. For example, nursing colleges and universities in Florida have worked to form strategic partnerships with private insurance
Nursing Shortage How can the facility recruit and retain sufficient nursing staff? Nursing shortage is a global trend (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2012) Ageing patient population Long hours and stress mean high turnover How the nursing shortage effects the facility Not enough nurses per shift to cover patient needs Nurses showing signs of physical stress (American Nursing Association, 2012a) Nurses showing signs of emotional stress (American Nursing Association, 2012a) Patient care is delayed, jeopardizes patient safety High turnover