Objectivity Readers a Prerequisite Reading Novels 2  Essay
- Length: 10 pages
- Subject: Literature
- Type: Essay
- Paper: #50703731
Excerpt from Essay :
objectivity readers a prerequisite reading novels? 2) monster a formal device shelley's Frankensten? 3) How convince a -hater a -lover? 4) -stop horror Marlowe, conrad's heart Darkness? 5) Pamela, In Richardson's Pamela, metaphor " ' binary opposition ' versus '? 6) Discuss 'tme' a major thematic device 'Of Love Demons' 7) How shepherdess teach Santiago, " Alchemist," -love? page answere.
Getting involved in reading a novel initially means employing a great deal of objectivity, given that one cannot simply come up with an opinion regarding a text before actually reading the respective manuscript. When reading a novel, the reader needs to acknowledge the fact that viewpoint expressed by previous readers are nothing more but interpretations. In order for the reader to form an opinion regarding the novel, he or she first needs to ignore any outside factors and engage in reading the text.
Novel's separate readers from one another because texts can be interpreted in a series of ways, as each reader is presented with the chance of understanding books from his or her own perspective. Mental solitude is what determines each individual's capacity to perceive a particular thing from his or her own point-of-view. The reading experience itself is likely to challenge previous convictions, given that readers develop interpretations as they progress and they can either agree or disagree to what they initially thought in regard to the novel they took on. In the process of understanding a text, readers can learn more about themselves, considering that they observe how their thinking affects the way they interpret the manuscript.
People are typically inclined to bring along prejudice when reading a novel, even if they are aware of the fact that objectivity is one of the essential elements that one must consider in such circumstances. On account of their background, skin color, religious preference, or gender, people form an opinion regarding a text even before reading it. This is surely wrong, as the text needs to be interpreted only consequent to being read. Expressing lack of enthusiasm toward reading a particular book as a result of the outside influences the reader came in contact with can be especially harmful for the respective individual when considering the actual reading experience.
Regardless of what a novel initially seems to be, one first has to employ a closer outlook in order to come up with an opinion regarding that particular novel, since doing otherwise would simply mean that the reader's thinking is virtually dictated by outside factors (namely other people's opinions).
In order to successfully form an opinion in regard to a novel, readers obviously have to read parts the respective text, since only then will their personal convictions intervene in forming an interpretation of the manuscript. Most people can be easily persuaded to form an opinion regarding a novel by popular reviews or by individuals whom they consider to be qualified to interpret the text better than them.
Mary Shelley's 1818 novel "Frankenstein" perfectly exemplifies how readers can be influenced in putting across emotional responses consequent to interacting with works of literature. The monster in the novel serves as a formal device, with Shelley's intention probably being that of shaping the emotional experience of her readers.
The monster is not necessarily meant to influence the public through its aesthetics, but by appealing to the reader's feelings. Readers normally tend to express certain emotions consequent to coming in contact with characters in novels. However, as the reading progresses they reshape their opinion in regard to the respective characters and eventually come to have an opinion that sums up all emotions felt by the readers throughout the novel.
In spite of the fact that it gradually becomes clear that the monster is dangerous and that it can easily kill innocent people, the reader is influenced in believing that it is practically impossible to hold the creature responsible for its crimes. Given that Shelley alternates between the narrators at times and presents readers with an account showing the monster's viewpoint makes it even less possible for the ones reading "Frankenstein" to develop a feeling of antipathy toward it.
By coming across the monster's perspective in the overall state of affairs, readers discover that it was actually influenced in behaving immorally. The monster is initially interested in forming a bond with its creator and the people living in the cottage. However, as it sees that it has no chance to do so, it becomes desperate and comes to perform terrible crimes. The readers thus attribute its criminal nature to society as a whole, understanding its frustration.
The fact that the monster is a formal device enables readers to break away from the passages that can trigger a feeling of strangeness. The monster is not as grotesque as one might think, as readers even come to identify with it at times, given that virtually anyone has went through a phase in their lives during which they were rejected by the outside world. However, the harsh rejection the monster encounters makes it obvious that matters are different in his case, as it is very unlikely that the world will ever come to appreciate his personality and ignore his appearance.
In spite of the fact that they are generally appreciated in the contemporary society, novels are not valued by everyone and there is great deal of individuals who actually hate them. It is normally not right to challenge one's choice regarding a particular matter the respective person does or does not like. However, most of the people who hate novels today do so because they are not well acquainted with the concept of a novel and consider that some of the main elements related to such a manuscript are its large size and long descriptions. Some novels are surely complicated and hence the grounds for which some people associate the general image of novels with boredom. Whereas most of these individuals are fond of TV-series, video games, or particular movies, they consider novels to be nothing like the matters aforementioned. However, they tend to ignore the fact that novels have served as a basis for most movies, games, and TV-series ever produced. Surely, playing a videogame or watching a movie might initially seem more interactive than reading a novel. Even with that, if film or videogame fans were to be presented with the exact novels that their favorite works are made after, it is very likely that they would come to look at novels from a different perspective.
The fact that most novels are much more complex than the motion pictures that use their storyline as a basis provides more information explaining why some prefer the latter in favor of the former. Motion pictures made after books basically summarize the overall story and only present the highlights. Many people have felt that films are nothing like books consequent to watching a movie and reading the book it was made after.
The suspense and the beauty of a novel are incomparable to anything ever produced by man and thus the reason why some novels can seem much more interesting to a novel hater if the respective individual is presented with reasonable information concerning the text.
Surely, one must no condemn a novel hater for the fact that he or she does not appreciate novels. The only ones who can be criticized for their opinion are those who have absolutely no clue about the object they disapprove of and simply do so because they consider their stance fashionable.
Joseph Conrad's 1902 novel "The Heart of Darkness" presents an episode from the life of Charles Marlow, a ferryboat captain working for a Belgian company in Africa. The character Kurtz, one of the individuals Marlow holds great respect for, interacts with the novel's protagonists and eventually dies before his eyes, his last words being "the horror, the horror!" In Marlow's opinion, Kurtz had most probably referred to the unfortunate turn in his life when saying his last words. In spite of the fact that these words are likely to be ignored by most readers, they are actually very important in having people understand more about the Kurtz, Marlow, and the general condition of the novel. Again, while most would consider Kurtz's words to be an allusion to the man's disastrous life, Marlow thinks otherwise, and believes that Kurtz's greatness is made obvious through his last words.
Kurtz had most probably been interested in declaring his total disapproval toward the fact that he was about to die, rather than referring to an enigma that no one could make sense of. Marlow actually goes through great efforts to have readers conclude that there was nothing wrong with Kurtz's life. Considering the nervousness in Kurtz's last words, one can easily be led to believe that the man's reputation had been but a false image of a desperate man who was only interested in gathering great fortunes.
Despite the fact that he was previously seen as an extremely moral…