Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
Old South and Secession
What Led Southerners to Choose Disunion?
The South had several grievances against the North and the federal government. First they resented and feared the intent of some Northerners to limit the spread of slavery or to abolish it. Slavery was becoming more and more an issue of contention as time passed. Second, Southerners hated the high tariffs imposed by the Northern dominated Congress. Since the South had little manufacturing capacity, it had to import finished goods, and thus was interested in low tariffs. The North wanted to protect its industry from foreign competition and favored high tariffs. Some have argued that this issue more than slavery led to succession. Third, Southerners felt that the federal government was making more investments in the North with regard to transportation systems and infrastructure. The government favored a strong central banking system as well. Many Southerners felt that the investments in the North and the support given to banks favored Northern commercial interests at the expense of the South. Fourth, the cultures were too different. The North was contained many recent immigrants and had an industrial economy, while Southern culture harkened back to the landed gentry of England. The main events that precipitated succession and war were the split of the Democratic Party in June, 1860 into Northern and Southern wings, which made the South feel isolated, the election of a Republican President, who opposed the expansion of slavery, and the call for volunteers after Fort Sumter was attacked. Despite assurances to the contrary, Southerners were convinced that Lincoln would end slavery. The call for volunteers pushed some wavering Southern states that had resisted secession, into the Confederacy (Catton, 1961; Davis, 1982).
II. The Role of Southern Radicals in Influencing Southerners to Support Secession
Radicals on both sides pushed the nation towards war. Southern Radicals were known as "Fire-Eaters." Men like William L. Yancey, William H. Gist, Roger Pryor, Jefferson Davis, and John Breckenridge were often unrelenting in their pursuit of succession. Davis had become convinced that the South was headed to minority status in the country and would have less and less influence in the country as time went on. The Radicals saw succession as the only hope of preserving the Southern way of life. Davis remarked to a Northern colleague that the North, with its superior numbers and greater wealth, was bent on making the South subservient to it. The radicals played on the fears of each group of Southerners. They convinced the planters that they would lose their slaves and wealth if slavery were abolished. They convinced poor and middle class whites that ex-slaves would challenge their social positions. The radicals also convinced many people that the tariffs supported by the North would impoverish all Southerners. The radicals made people believe that the North had no will to fight. When federal property was seized in Alabama and Florida with no federal response, many people felt that the radicals must have been right. Finally, they worked to squash all attempts at compromise, such as the Crittenden Compromise (Catton, 1961; Woodworth, 2000).
III. The Birth of the Confederacy
The Confederacy was born as a result of the election of Abraham Lincoln in a four way race on 6 November 1860. The states of the Deep South, particularly South Carolina, had said that they would leave the Union if a Republican were ever elected. On 20 December 1860 South Carolina seceded. Six more states followed from 9 January to 1 February 1861. On 4 February 1861, these states held a convention in Montgomery, Alabama to form the Confederacy. Jefferson Davis was elected President. These seven states began to seize federal property within their borders as President Buchanan, a lame duck, took no action. Fort Sumter, in the harbor of Charleston, SC remained in federal hands, but was besieged and running low on supplies. On 12 April Confederate forces fired on and captured Fort Sumter. Within days, President Lincoln called for the Union States to furnish 75,000 troops. This prompted four Upper South states to secede and join the Confederacy. On 29 May 1861, Richmond, Virginia became the capital of the Confederacy (Woodworth, 2000).
IV. Challenges of the Infant Confederacy
The main challenge that the infant Confederacy faced was the lack of support from…[continue]
"Old South" (2003, May 07) Retrieved October 28, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/old-south-150275
"Old South" 07 May 2003. Web.28 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/old-south-150275>
"Old South", 07 May 2003, Accessed.28 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/old-south-150275
Honor and Violence in the Old South Honor and Violence is the Old South is actually an abridged version of Bertram Wyatt-Brown's Southern Honor: Ethics and Behavior in the Old South. The book presents an objective and highly well researched account of life for women and slaves in the South who were considered devices with which to maintain family honor. The subject of honor has been studied from historical and anthropological
Old South: Middle Florida's Plantation Frontier before the Civil War" by Edward E. Baptist. 1. What is the big historical question; Summarize the main points of the questions or theories the author is trying to address in his/her work. 2. Where does the work fit in the existing historiography. 3. What evidence does the author use to make the case? 4. Briefly summarize the author's findings. 5. How well
changed "Old South" ( Civil War) "New South" ( Civil War Second World War) modern South today? What gained? What lost? What impact Civil War Emancipation Southern Economy? The economy North? How Southern agriculture reorganized Civil War? What planters ? Black Freedmen? Consider tenancy sharecropping -- controversial? How Post war Southern agriculture Civil War? What trends southern agriculture 1865-1920? How compare mid-west? Were black tenants locked debt peonage tied
Both Mrs. Hopewell and her daughter Hulga are judgmental, but for different reasons. Mrs. Hopewell is middle class and has tenants on her farmland. She only wants "good country people" as tenants. In her estimation, "good country people" are stereotypically poor, "salt of the earth" types with no pretensions about them. They are not educated, but they do not behave in ways Mrs. Hopewell would find embarrassing. For this
Almost a third of the government's total revenue emanate from indirect taxes, mainly from value-added taxes (Brand South Africa, Niekerk). 3. privatization -- this process was viewed to create a robust flow of business opportunities in the next many years at a range of 100-150 billion South African Rands (PGI 2012). This is equivalent to U.S.$12-20 billion. There will be estimated and sustained business acquisition opportunities in agribusiness, agriculture and
South Africa's high rate of unemployment reflects that lack of employment opportunities for the majority black African population. This is an endemic problem for the entire region, as unemployment rates in Swaziland, Lesotho, Zimbabwe, Namibia and Botswana are actually higher. The problem relates specifically to black Africans, and especially in rural areas. The wealthiest province, in terms of performance in poverty indicators, is Western Cape, and this province in Coloured
Certainly, this is reinforced by recent legislative efforts currently under discussion in the parliament. The ruling Grand National Party has been the subject of public resistance more recently, perhaps owing to the global economic slowdown which has caused widespread discontent throughout the world. In response, and with elections -- at that time -- approaching, the South Korean government considered the passage of legislation that would both place limitations and