Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
, 1999). Generally speaking, the results of this study showed that increased levels of diversity within the top leadership team had a negative impact on their ability to reach strategic consensus because of both direct and indirect effects (Knight et al., 1999).
These findings are not that surprising, of course, given that it is intuitive that as diversity within a top leadership team increases, so too will the range of views that will be brought to the management table for consideration. Despite these constraints to consensus building, there are some highly desirable outcomes that can be achieved using the strategic diversity management approach that make it worthy of consideration by organizations that are "stuck in a diversity rut."
Strategic diversity management can improve organizational effectiveness by facilitating communication between superiors, peers and subordinates. Although many organizations have recognized the importance and value of a diversified workforce, some have failed to realize the benefits that can be achieved through a strategic alignment between these initiatives and the larger organizational goals they are designed to support. For instance, according to Thomas (2006), "Strategic diversity management can serve as the framework bridge that organizations, leaders, and rank-and-file employees can use to reach the next level of diversity management. Strategic diversity management possesses or fosters the attributes that companies and their diversity leaders need if they are to become unstuck" (p. 82). In order to move beyond their current diversity framework, organizations must adopt a new reference frame that includes the concepts set forth in Table 1 below.
Conditions organizations must adopt to achieve full benefits from strategic diversity management
Individuals and corporations must learn to use at least two perspectives (this would presumably include empathetic responses to diversity critics and the diversity tension that can restrict implementation and administration).
An alternative decision-making framework
Organizations use these multiple perspectives to develop a refined decision-making framework.
Capability vs. solution
The alternative framework should help leaders formulate informed decisions based on the current environment rather than delivering "boilerplate" solutions.
Accommodation of diversity tension
Diversity champions will require decision making frameworks that accommodate the reality of diversity tension. Both organizations and individuals will have to remain effective for the duration of such tension states.
This level of diversity management will acknowledge that while sexism, racism, and other forms of discrimination can adversely affect decision making, there are also factors involved that may account for such poor decisions including the complexity of the issues that are involved as well as cognitive limitations.
Individuals (e.g., rank-and-file employees, managers, executives as well as diversity leaders) must all "own" the need for a diversified workplace as well as the larger society in which the organization competes.
These are needed to help establish benchmarks and assess the effectiveness of diversity management initiatives.
Source: Adapted from Thomas, 2006, p. 82
There are some other ways in which strategic diversity management can help improve organizational effectiveness as well. For example, the consultants at the Society for Human Resource Management report that, "A diverse workforce and an inclusive climate can, if managed well, help the organization to work better" (Leveraging employee diversity, 2011, para. 2). Notwithstanding the constraints to consensus building among an organization's top leadership team caused by increased diversity noted above, these consultants also cite other ways in which a strategic diversity management approach can help improve organizational effectiveness. In this regard, the Society for Human Resource Management adds that, "Diverse and inclusive workplaces have the potential to be more innovative, have more access to talent, and be better able to meet the needs of an increasingly diverse customer base. Organizations that can leverage employee diversity are not only better places to work, but places that work better" (Leveraging employee diversity, 2011, para. 3).
Translating diversity into revenues can represent a major selling point for diversity champions of course, and even the most recalcitrant Old School leadership team may be convinced that it is in their best interests to diversify their workforce if these points can be made sufficiently clear to them. According to the consultants at the Society for Human Resource Management, it is possible to leverage diversity in a number of ways that can contribute to organizational performance, including the following:
1. Ensuring that sales and marketing teams are diverse will increase the likelihood that performance and products will meet the needs of a diverse customer base.
2. Creating research teams with an eye on diversity of background and discipline can result in processes and solutions that are more innovative and cutting-edge.
3. Increasing the diversity of your recruiting teams will enable your organization to attract the best and brightest applicants of all backgrounds and identities (Leveraging employee diversity, 2011, para. 4).
Finally, in order to achieve these desirable outcomes, organizations must ensure that they have certain key elements in place beyond the concepts set forth in Table 1 above, including those set forth in Table 2 below:
Key elements to building a strategic diversity management program
Strong Business Case
A diversity plan that is successful must be relevant to the organization's mission, vision and business objectives.
Commitment from the Top
When building a strategic diversity plan, commitment from the top means that those who will eventually implement the plan have the backing, support and active involvement of the organization's leadership, including the CEO, board of directors, executive team, etc.
Vision, Mission and Strategy
An organization's vision, mission and strategy are essentially the "where, what and how" of your Strategic Diversity Management Plan.
Recruitment and Sourcing
Diversity recruitment means companies recruit individuals with a collective mixture of differences and similarities that include individual characteristics, values and beliefs, experiences and backgrounds.
Retention is the rate at which current employees of your organization are staying in their jobs. Retention is the opposite of "turnover." Therefore, if turnover is low, then retention is high.
Training and Development
Training and development includes all activities that are designed and implemented to support an employee's knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs, or "competencies").
Leveraging Employee Diversity
Any Strategic Diversity Management Plan has as an end state a workplace that is more diverse and more inclusive than the workplace that currently exists.
Measurement and Accountability
When businesses move in any new direction, they expect to know if their efforts have achieved the desired results, and if not, who will be responsible for a correcting the methodology so that those desired results can be achieved.
Source: Creating a Strategic Diversity Management Plan, 2011
Arnold, V.D. & Krapels, A.H. (1996, May/June). 'Motivation: a Reincarnation of Ideas.'
Industrial Management, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 8-10.
Davidson, M.J. & Fielden, S.L. (2003). Individual Diversity and Psychology in Organizations.
Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Drucker, P. (1993). Managing in Turbulent Times. New York: Harper Business.
Ellinger, A.E., Ellinger, A.D. & Keller, S.B. (2002). 'Logistics Managers' Learning
Environments and Firm Performance.' Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp.
Katsva, M. & Condrey, S.E. (2005). 'Motivating Personnel at Russian Nuclear Power Plants: A
Case-Study of Motivation Theory Application.' Public Personnel Management, Vol. 34,
No. 4, pp. 343-347.
Knight, D., Pearce, C.L., Smith, K.G. et al. (1999). 'Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus.' Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp.
Leveraging employee diversity. (2011). Society for Human Resource Management. [online]
Kramer, R. (2007). 'Leading Change through Action Learning: Agency Managers Can Change
Organizational Culture and Build a Learning Environment, as Demonstrated by APHIS.'
The Public Manager, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 38-40.
Miller, C.C., Burke, L.M. & Glick, W.H. (1998). 'Cognitive diversity among upper-echelon executives: implications for strategic decision processes.' Strategic Management Journal,
Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 39-59.
Pool, S.W. (1997). 'The Relationship of Job Satisfaction with Substitutes of Leadership,…[continue]
"Organizations Need An Awareness Of" (2011, December 10) Retrieved October 27, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/organizations-need-an-awareness-of-48373
"Organizations Need An Awareness Of" 10 December 2011. Web.27 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/organizations-need-an-awareness-of-48373>
"Organizations Need An Awareness Of", 10 December 2011, Accessed.27 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/organizations-need-an-awareness-of-48373
Global Leadership Competencies International organizations need transformation. Leaders in all sectors have a challenge to lead globally now and in the future. This requires an examination of current leaders of international organizations who have always been required to lead globally. Many lessons come out of these leaders because they have experience, influence, and motivation. The lessons will help others become successful global leaders and lead to success in the future. Leadership
Organization Behavior International Development and Strategic Management at Proctor & Gamble International development International Development and Strategic Management at Procter & Gamble Every organization wishes to keep its operations on a continuous growing pace in its industry (Barnes, Blake, & Pinder 2009). As a part of its business expansion strategies, it can also aim to target international markets if it possesses the core competencies and financial resources to meet the requirements of this expansion
Organizational Climate Compare and Contrast organizational (command) climate with organizational culture. Organizational climate is the recurring patterns of behavior, attitudes and feelings that characterize life in an organization or company. It is used to describe the dimensions of the environment at work. The factors that determine organizational climate are leadership, organizational structure, historical forces, standards of accountability, standards of behavior, communication, rewards, trust, commitment, vision and strategies, and organizational correctiveness. Leadership is a
Organizational Culture and Sustained Competitive Advantage Organizational culture is a defining feature of every organization. The unique culture that every organization displays has an affect on its ability to remain profitable. Culture can have either positive or negative affect on the ability of the organization to remain competitive. Much academic research up to this point has focused on theory and defining what is meant by culture and sustainable competitive advantage. This
Organizational Culture of Wal-Mart Since the year of 2008, Wal-Mart has been branded that name but before then, it was an American international trader company that runs chains of big discount department stores and warehouse supplies. Wal- Mart has turned into the world's third biggest public corporation, dependable with the Fortune Global 500 list in the year of 2012.This business has also turned out to be a private employer in the
Organizational Change and Development This is an article on various aspects of change with special emphasis on the factors for change and subsequent OD activities. It has 11 sources. Change is invariable in any management setting though it is concerned with the whole organization or only certain key management roles. Even though change in any form is one of the most contentious issues to deal with, it must be said that change
Organizations need to manage employee stress that is directly related to technology by such means as offering stress-management seminars, allocating certain times of the day for relaxation, investing in ergonomic technology, and by judicious use of communications technologies. Preventing stress is far easier and cheaper than treating stress-related illnesses. Therefore, one of the trends in organizational behavior regarding the impact of technology on work-related stress is to improve the workspace