Procter vs. J&J Procter & Gamble and Johnson & Johnson are very similar a lot of tangible ways. The major similarities include the fact that they are both sellers of common and widely used consumable products, they are both mainstays of the corporation scene in the United States and neither one of them has ever had any major systemic issues since their founding. Even so, there are some notable and real

The company also wishes to expand its business operations to new potential markets in the short run. However, it will first have to analyze its internal strengths and weaknesses in order to evaluate its own capabilities to penetrate in that market in an effective way (Perreault & McCarthy 2002). On the basis of this analysis, it can be recommended that P&G should first focus on improving its existing products

This is an environmental disaster because many organisms like fish depend on it for survival. P&G has to handle these environmental problems quickly. Some of the measures mentioned above like the implementation of waste control measures can go a long way in making the rivers and oceans safer for humans as well as the other organisms that depend on it for survival. They are the market leaders and when they

P&G is looking to make the Supplier Environmental Sustainability Scorecard methodology a global standard (P&G, 2010). To support this effort to make the scorecard a global baseline of sustainability measurement, P&G freely distributes Microsoft Excel models of the methodology and baseline analysis tools from their website. The foundations of the methodology can be seen in Figure 2: Procter & Gamble's Supplier Environmental Sustainability Scorecard Methodology. The key metrics measured

There is also an inability to distinguish the product lines from that of the competitors, although the company has succeeded effectively in creating brand recognition for their products. Customer loyalty and brand loyalty of the past cannot always be counted upon to create the necessary profitability for the company. This is obvious in the case of P & G. that the marketing strategy that the organization uses for different products

The company is permanently spending considerable amounts on R&D to innovate its products and on advertising to maintain the brands awareness high. Shareholders are more satisfied than ever after Procter's recovery in the late 1990s, early 2000. But they did not encourage much the recovery process because it took almost two years and they were expecting a fast recovery process. Pantene Currently there are over 100 Pantene products. Pantene shampoo has 25