Revocable and an Irrevocable Trust The Difference Essay

Download this Essay in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Essay:

revocable and an irrevocable trust? The difference between a revocable and an irrevocable trust is very simple. A revocable trust is one that has been created and that can be revoked at a future time - generally for specific reasons (CompTax, n.d.). These kinds of trusts can also be changed, so if a person does not want to completely revoke the trust but wants to make adjustments, that is possible (CompTax, n.d.). Often these kinds of trusts are made when it comes to wills and estate planning, but they can also be used in order to focus on business transactions and the individuals who are allowed to initiate or complete those transactions. An irrevocable trust, as the name implies, is one that cannot be revoked. Once it has been created it is not able to be changed, which means that anyone who creates it must be very careful about doing so (CompTax, n.d.). Irrevocable trusts are not as common, because changes cannot be made to them at a later date. What is done with this type of trust, and that requires careful consideration for estate planning and in the business world, as well. While it is possible for a person to make an irrevocable trust without regrets, it is better to keep the trust revocable in case circumstances change in the future.

2) Write on what distinguishes the following cases from one another: Jiminez v. Lee, Unthank v. Sippstein, Clark v. Campbell, Hieble v. Hieble. There are several distinctions between the cases addressed here, all of which are designed to address and uphold trusts. In Jimenez v. Lee, the court ruled in favor of a daughter who claimed her father misused the funds in her trust. The ruling was made because there are very few words needed to actually create a trust, and the creation of such is more about intent, which was clearly demonstrated (CompTax, n.d.). Unthank v. Sippstein and Clark v. Campbell were both similar cases in that the court determined there was no trust. In the first case that was due to the lack of actual intent to create a trust, and in the second case that was due to the lack of clarity regarding to whom the property should be given (CompTax, n.d.). Hieble v. Hieble was unique in that there was no written agreement (CompTax, n.d.). The law generally says that all trusts must be in writing, but an exception was made in this particular case because of the clarity and the intent that took place between the adult children and the mother who wanted the property back (CompTax, n.d.). All of the cases dealt with trusts, but they were also different in the way they handled those trusts and how the trusts were seen to be created.

3) What are capital gains? Capital gains, in their simplest form, are properties that are held for the purpose of investment (CompTax, n.d.). This property is held by a taxpayer, and does not need to be connected to his or her business dealings to be considered for capital gain (CompTax, n.d.). The property can be personal in nature, such as a landlord who is renting something out, as opposed to being professional in nature, such as a business that is renting or leasing space or equipment (CompTax, n.d.). Some stocks, certain types of property, copyrights, and a few other items are not acceptable to be used for capital gains (CompTax, n.d.). In order for something to be acceptable for capital gains it must not be on the list of items that do not qualify, and it must also be actual capital. In other words, it must be something tangible that a person or business can use, and it must be able to be used in order to gain income. Sometimes people who are utilizing capital in this way end up losing money, but naturally that is not the intention. The desire is to see a monetary gain for the use of the capital.

4) What is the difference between long-term and short-term capital gains? Long-term capital gains are those that are intended to continue for some time, or that are not intended to see results right away (CompTax, n.d.). Both of these options can be considered long-term gains, but one is more desirable than the other. It is much better to start seeing gains immediately and keep seeing those gains for a very long time, as opposed to not seeing any gains immediately and begin required to wait a long time before the gains start to appear (CompTax, n.d.). That is true no matter how high the gains are or how long they will go on after they start to be realized. With short-term capital gains, the gain is often more immediate but does not last as long (CompTax, n.d.). The goal with these types of capital gains is to make some quick money and then move on to something else. If the person or business that is interested in capital gains has to have money right away but does not need a long-term solution to a financial problem, short-term capital gains can be a better choice. Of course, long-term capital gains can provide a higher degree of financial stability and security (CompTax, n.d.).

5) What types of property results in capital gains, i.e., what is a capital asset? Many different types of property can result in capital gains (CompTax, n.d.). Most often, this property is either equipment or buildings. When buildings or other immovable fixtures are capital assets, they are generally taxed in the country in which they are located, no matter where the actual companies have headquarters (CompTax, n.d.). Smaller assets that can be moved are generally taxed in the country where they are moved to if they are purchased by a company (CompTax, n.d.). There may be tax implications of the sale of those items, however, to the selling company in the country in which it is located (CompTax, n.d.). That is important to consider, because any sale or purchase of any type of property can have taxation and capital gains repercussions that should be addressed before the purchase is made (CompTax, n.d.). That avoids difficulty with taxing authorities at a later date, and also helps to ensure that both buyer and seller of the equipment are aware of what kinds of tax implications they are facing, so the transaction can be completed to everyone's satisfaction.

6) Stock and dividends are treated differently for tax purposes. Which one is treated as a capital gain when sold and which one is treated as an ordinary gain when sold? Stock cannot be used as a capital gain, so it is treated as a regular gain (CompTax, n.d.). Dividends, on the other hand, can be treated as a capital gain (CompTax, n.d.). It is very important that anyone who has stock sales or dividends consult his or her tax adviser, in order to be sure that the information gained is correct and that the items are taxed appropriately. Because there are so many tax rules and regulations, there are many ways to make mistakes without meaning to cause any kind of problem for the company or person who has to pay the tax bill (CompTax, n.d.). In other words, people often do not realize that certain types of gains have to be taxed differently when they are acquired and when they are sold. Those who are not aware of this issue will end up with tax problems in the future, which is naturally something they would want to avoid.

7) How are capital gains different from ordinary gains? Capital gains are different because they are gains on the sale or rent of specific capital (tangible items) as opposed to ordinary gains that are seen (such as income from work performed) (CompTax, n.d.). When people work and they bring in income, they do have a gain. There is value in what they get from the work they do. However, this does not mean that they cannot acquire gains in other ways - such as from the capital they rent or sell (CompTax, n.d.). It is not always easy to distinguish gains properly, especially since not every country has the same kinds of rules for taxation. Despite this, a good tax professional can provide plenty of insight and information to anyone who needs to move forward with selling or renting capital in order to make some extra money. Whether a person is seeking long-term or short-term capital gains, there are options for that person to use. It is very important to know how things are taxed first, though, to avoid penalties and problems in the future.

8) How are capital losses treated and how do they differ from capital gains? Capital gains are gains that are seen when a person or business is holding something for investment (CompTax, n.d.). Capital losses are losses that occur when the investment property fails to make money. Each person or business…[continue]

Cite This Essay:

"Revocable And An Irrevocable Trust The Difference" (2013, January 29) Retrieved December 7, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/revocable-and-an-irrevocable-trust-the-85547

"Revocable And An Irrevocable Trust The Difference" 29 January 2013. Web.7 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/revocable-and-an-irrevocable-trust-the-85547>

"Revocable And An Irrevocable Trust The Difference", 29 January 2013, Accessed.7 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/revocable-and-an-irrevocable-trust-the-85547

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Trust Is a Valuable Tool

    The principal is the property that is contained in the trust that produces income like dividends, rents, and interest. Payments for bills to the trust may be paid out of either income or principal but payments to beneficiaries may be made out from income only. Where such payments will be made lies within the discretion of the trustee. Determining the proper distribution of income and principal is one of


Read Full Essay
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved