Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from essay:
It becomes clear that Tartuffe, as he becomes increasingly powerful in the play, considers himself above the others, and because of his "spirituality," he is above the laws of God, too. He tells Elmire, Orgon's wife, "I'll teach you, Ma'am, that Heaven's contradictions, give latitude to men of pure convictions. it's true that Heaven frowns on some dark acts, though with great men, our Lord makes higher pacts" (Moliere, Act IV, Scene 5). He tells her this as he is attempting to seduce her, so it is clear that Tartuffe thinks he is above everything, including sin, and that he has a "special" pact with God that allows him to pretty much do as he pleases. This is another jab at religion, which often takes itself too seriously, and so do some members of organized religions, and this is who Moliere is parodying in the play.
In the end, Orgon discovers Tartuffe attempting to seduce his wife, and then he learns, in a complex part of the plot, that Tartuffe has obtained ownership of Orgon's house, and he is going to force the family to leave, leaving them in financial and personal ruin. Tartuffe has denounced Orgon to the king, and Orgon is devastated. The man he trusted and gave so much to has betrayed him, and has shown himself to be nothing more than an evil manipulator. When it seems as if nothing can intervene, the police arrest Tartuffe and restore the home to Orgon and his family. The king, who is pure and good, saw the evil in Tartuffe's heart and knows that he has committed crimes in the past.
Moliere wrote this play for the king, and so gave him the best qualities in the play, which are directly opposite of Orgon's qualities. Orgon is not wise enough to see through Tartuffe, but the king is, and that is the only thing that saves the family. Tartuffe will not be able to hurt anyone else, Orgon's daughter can marry the man she loves, and everything will turn out all right in the end. Again, the most pious and fanatical character in the play, Tartuffe, turns out to be the villain in the play, and that is Moliere's commentary on religion. It is better to be wise and trust your heart than trust the exclamations of others, especially when they claim to be so spiritual, seems to be this play's central message. So, it was not critical of religion, as such, it was critical of the zealots and fanatics, and of those who put too much faith into religion without questioning the ulterior motives of the overly faithful.
Moliere created the play as a comedy because the situation is absurd, and so are some of the characters. Making the play a comedy makes it easier for him to poke fun at religion and religious beliefs, because it is seen as being amusing and entertaining, at the same time. He writes with a knowledge of people and their weaknesses, and critic Crawford notes this. He writes, "Moliere has simply observed his fellow man and has probed deeply into his idiosyncrasies. But his probing is always in the comic spirit, and exaggeration of character, one of the main controls in comedy of humors, is fully employed for the evocation of laughter" (Crawford). Moliere could have made this a serious drama, but it would not have been the same, and it might have been even more offensive to theatergoers of the time.
In conclusion, "Tartuffe" sheds light on the way people react to religion and religious fanaticism, and shows that some people will use religion for their own gains, preying on the weak and the overly pious. Simply boasting about one's religious faith does not make it so, and by making Tartuffe a liar, evil, and a hypocrite, Moliere is really saying that religion can be just as bad as anything else if it is used in the wrong hands. He just does that in a very clever way with this play.
Crawford, Jerry L. "Tartuffe: Attacking Hypocrisy, Not Religion." Utah Shakespeare Festival. 2007. 4 Nov. 2008. http://www.bard.org/education/resources/other/tartuffeattacking.html
Moliere. "Tartuffe." Bibliomania. 2008. 4 Nov. 2008. http://www.bibliomania.com/0/6/4/1966/frameset.html
Mooney, Timothy. "Tartuffe." Tartuffe in English. 2008. 4 Nov. 2008. http://moliere-in-english.com/tartuffe.html[continue]
"Tartuffe Or The Hypocrite By" (2008, November 04) Retrieved December 5, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/tartuffe-or-the-hypocrite-by-27044
"Tartuffe Or The Hypocrite By" 04 November 2008. Web.5 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/tartuffe-or-the-hypocrite-by-27044>
"Tartuffe Or The Hypocrite By", 04 November 2008, Accessed.5 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/tartuffe-or-the-hypocrite-by-27044
Tartuffe, Swift and Voltaire In his own way, Moliere's Tartuffe represents one aspect of the Enlightenment, if only a negative one, since he is a purely self-interested individual who cares only about advancing his own wealth and status. He is a fraud, a con artist and a hypocrite who puts on a show of religion but is really only interested in stealing Orgon's estate -- and his wife. Orgon is too
Tartuffe An Analysis of Hypocrisy in Moliere's Tartuffe No greater example of the religious hypocrite exists in all history than the example of the Philistine. What characterizes the Philistine (and all hypocrites) is something Richard Weaver describes as a barbarian desire to see a thing "as it is" (24). What Weaver implies is that the hypocrite, while making a great show of piety and the possession of virtue, actually lacks the interior
Tartuffe Moliere's Tartuffe is from 17th century France, during the Enlightenment, or the Age of Reason. Louis XIV, also known as the Sun King, was the ruler of France at this time. People in Paris were interested in Enlightenment values such as rationality, moderation, and order. Also, social graces, good manners, and gender roles were strictly enforced during this period. Moliere demonstrates all of these Enlightenment values in his play. The
The places they live in and the things that surround them are in varying degrees atmospheric and expressive. In Tartuffe material objects, the props and the house itself, and the places alluded to? Paris and province, heaven and earth, palace and prison? have a particular importance (Hope 44). This does not tie the play to a particular time and place, however, but only shows the importance of locale to the action of
Tartuffe In the play, Jean-Baptiste Poquelin Moliere narrates the story of how a scoundrel and a hypocrite disguises himself as a pious man of religion. By affecting religious behavior, Tartuffe charms his way into the house and the favors of Orgon, a local rich man. Orgon is unfortunately unable to see through Tartuffe's duplicity, and in the process almost loses all his possessions to the scoundrel Tartuffe. Only the fortuitous intervention
Tartuffe, Frankenstein, and Candide -- Nature and Science vs. Religion Moliere's comedic play "Tartuffe," Mary Shelley's science fiction Romantic-era novel Frankenstein, and Voltaire's allegorical political satire Candide, all function as Enlightenment or scientific critiques of the authors' contemporary religious and societal mores. These works all uphold rationalism as the 'natural' or most beneficial state of human belief, in contrast to primitive and absolute trust in religious creed. However, all three works
Moliere Tartuffe Acts III-IV The third and fourth acts of Moliere's comedy Tartuffe raise the drama to a climactic confrontation which resolves in an unexpected direction at the end of Act III, allowing for a new twist in the final act. The third act centers around the actual introduction of Tartuffe -- whom we have heard described from the play's opening but have not yet met. His entrance does not disappoint,