Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
Thucydides is known as one of the greatest historians of ancient Greece. This paper focuses on the life, work and philosophy of Thucydides. The paper also discusses the influence and significance of his theories and principles in the field of education.
Thucydides was one of the greatest Greek historians who is known for his Magnus opus, "History of Peloponnesian War." This account of the great Peloponnesian War is not exactly complete as it only presents the events that took place during 431 to 411 B.C. But the reason why it is remembered and read as one of the most perfect Greek literatures is because it reflects Thucydides' genuinely original style interspersed with wisdom and objectivity which most other historians of that period lacked. There is still some confusion about the exact year of his birth as some ancient historians have given dates, which clash with dates provided by modern researchers. But for the sake of convenience, it is believed that he was born somewhere around 460 B.C. And died in 400 B.C. The year of his birth may cause confusion but one thing is clear; the man was certainly present during the Peloponnesian war in which he actively participated only to be exiled to Sparta. He was a military general and thus possessed in-depth knowledge of military skills and techniques. He has thus provided his readers with accurate account of he military tactics used by both Spartans and Athenians during the Peloponnesian war. Unlike Herodotus who was another famous Greek historian, Thucydides did not rely on hearsay or oral information to collect material for his book. Rather he decided to observe events personally and thus was able to present a firsthand account of the war. He wrote in his book, "As to the deeds done in the war, I have not thought myself at liberty to record them on hearsay from the first informant or on arbitrary conjecture. My account rests either on personal knowledge or on the closest possible scrutiny of each statement made by others. The process of research was laborious, because conflicting accounts were given by those who had witnessed the several events, as partiality swayed or memory served them." (1)
The best thing about Thucydides is that he never believed in conforming to tradition or convention and rather chose to develop his own style of writing which reflected a unique sharp mind and clear uninfluenced thinking. The reason why it is important to mention his work is because it reveals a lot about the man who makes frequent appearances in ancient records. To find out more about his personality and character, one needs to read his work closely and watch the author speaking his mind from between the lines. His philosophy did not involve gods unlike the philosophies of other Greek writers. In his times, it was a common belief that gods played a bigger role in man's life than man himself. Thucydides refused to buy such beliefs and firmly maintained that man was the ruler of his destiny and thus it was man's nature that was more important in destiny than gods or any other external force.
Benjamin Jowett (1881) commented on Thucydides' philosophy and principles by referring to the reface of Thucydides' work, "He then explains the principles upon which he evaluates evidence; his basic perspective is that human nature is the basic cause of historical events (Thucydides attributes no historical event to either the gods or to fate). He declares that his History will not be so entertaining as some others (such as Homer and Herodotus), but instead be a rational analysis that will be useful to those who wish to understand the way things happen, since events similar to those of the past will certainly recur in the future because human nature is unchanging. He analyzes the events of this War, he tells us, in order to enable future generations to understand the causes and progress of future wars, though not necessarily to prevent them." (2)
Thucydides was a man of absolutely original and clear thinking and thus has been widely read in the United States. Certain portions of his works have gained the status of mandatory reading in philosophy classes. The reason it is important to introduce his work…[continue]
"Thucydides Is Known As One Of The" (2002, October 24) Retrieved December 9, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/thucydides-is-known-as-one-of-the-137253
"Thucydides Is Known As One Of The" 24 October 2002. Web.9 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/thucydides-is-known-as-one-of-the-137253>
"Thucydides Is Known As One Of The", 24 October 2002, Accessed.9 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/thucydides-is-known-as-one-of-the-137253
It made no "long speech no one would believe, of fine moral arguments" (Woodruff 103). However, Pericles' claim that Athens did not need support to uphold its borders falls completely flat in the face of Athenian desperation to hold onto its empire. Thucydides, writing with the benefit of hindsight and the knowledge of the outcome of the war shows the Athenians in a far more ambiguous light than Pericles the
Rome One could be important in Roman society either by doing something great, or simply by being born into high status. In other words, Romans valued both accomplishment and privilege. Which of these two do you think was more prominent in Roman society? Argue for one over against the other. Your argument must incorporate an analysis of two things: a specific historical event or institution, and the point-of-view of a Roman
Instead of meaning "apology" in the modern sense, I am sorry, it is more a rhetorical device to allow one to defend one's beliefs and actions. Most of the text is written from Socrates' point-of-view, and while there were a number of accounts written about Socrates' last days, most consider Plato's version to be the most historically accurate- at least for writers of that time period. In terms of evidence,
Greek and Roman History The Greek and Roman civilizations each played an important part in shaping the history of today. It is interesting to look at these two cultures and the major contributions of each. Greek History The Greek civilization was defined in the 5th century BC by the Golden Age. Athens was home at this time to "statesmen such as Pericles, Solon and Lycourgos. Pericles, who lived from 495 to 429 B.C., was responsible
(Leaves, 680) Similarly Whitman informs us: Stop this day and night with me and you shall possess the origin of all poems, You shall possess the good of the earth and sun…there are millions of suns left, You shall no longer take things at second or third hand…nor look through the eyes of the dead…nor feed on the specters in books, You shall not look through my eyes either, nor take things from me.
S.S.R. stands the fact that civil strife is less dangerous if it takes place on the losing side that it is on the winning side (p99). Realists and Their Critics Predictive failure: realism through structural realism failed to predict the fall of the U.S.S.R. And instead foresaw stability in the bipolar system. However, no theory considered the idea of the way in which the Cold War would end. Even so, theorists did
Greek History Ancient Greek History As the leader of Athens during the Peloponnesian War, it was Pericles' responsibility to develop an overall strategy for the waging of the war. The strategy he developed played on Athens' strengths and the weaknesses of the Spartans. Thucydides, in The Peloponnesian War, praised Pericles' strategic ability stating "when war broke out, he also he seems to have rightly gauged the power of his country." (Strassler 1996,