Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Research Paper:
U.S. Army Ethics: The Difficulties with Ethics in Certain Types of Organizations
Current Situation and Issues Addressed
Ethics matter in any kind of business or organization, but they are especially significant when it comes to the U.S. Army (Blackburn, 2001). The reason behind this involves the chain of command and the risk to life and limb that are such large parts of military life. When a soldier in the Army has no ethics, he or she can cause trust and respect problems with other members of his or her unit. The U.S. military is a stressful organization for most people involved with it, and people's lives are on the line frequently. Issues like PTSD and other medical problems are commonplace for those who leave the military and must adjust to civilian life, so it is very important that those who are in the Army work with their colleagues and higher-ups to get the help and support they need during and after their service. There is more to ethics in the Army than the problems that military individuals can face, though.
Other concerns include the way individuals are treated based on race, gender, and other factors (Singer, 2000; Solomon, 1984). With more women in the Army today, there are concerns about rape and sexual harassment. There are also concerns regarding trust, because some types of soldiers do not feel comfortable trusting their lives to other types of soldiers. While this should not be the case, it often is - and it can be a serious problem because trust is vital for soldiers who are working together. Additionally, the leadership of those soldiers is very important (Fagothey, 2000; Mondy & Mondy, 2012). Leaders need to provide loyalty and strength to those who they are leading (Mondy & Mondy, 2012). If they cannot do this correctly, or if they do something that causes the soldiers under their command to lose trust in them, there are serious problems that will develop within that unit. The military has been a tight-knit unit for years, but recently there have been some scandals high up in the ranks that have caused problems. That, coupled with rising suicide and mental health treatment rates, is an indicator that there are problems - and that these problems may be larger than was first anticipated when they began to come to light (Blackburn, 2001).
Statement of the Problem
The problem with ethics in the U.S. Army today is that leadership is struggling to address its own issues, and scandal and discord seem to be running rampant. While that might appear to sound overly dramatic, there are many issues that are wrapped up in the main concern: that soldiers are not getting what they need from their military leaders, both when they are in the Army and after they leave the service (Mondy & Mondy, 2012). Naturally, this is a serious consideration because soldiers must be at their best in order to handle the demands of their jobs. These demands may be part of the problem for the leaders, because they have so much with which they must cope that they find themselves struggling as much as those who are putting their trust in them (Mondy & Mondy, 2012). When this occurs, both the soldiers and the leaders of those soldiers are dealing with and working with ethics that are broken.
Additionally, they are working within a broken system that is causing them to struggle to fix issues that they are not actually able to fully address. That is not a helpful or comfortable place for anyone (Blackburn, 2001). The issue is magnified when it is involving the military, because soldiers and leaders have a perception to uphold. They are seen as being "more than" in a lot of ways. Bigger, stronger, faster, smarter - those are all things that many people think about soldiers. The toughness and the dedication and the willingness to lay down one's life for one's country are significant, and they are attributes that are not shared by everyone (Fagothey, 2000). When ethics are not part of the equation, however, it is clear that the soldiers and their leaders can find problems developing that could have been avoided otherwise. Fixing the problems will not happen overnight, but it cannot happen at all if there is no effort made and if there is no level of understanding as to the nature and severity of the problems.
Current Situation and Issues Addressed
The current situation is dire, because the military is struggling with a core value of St. Leo's: that of respect. St. Leo's value of respect says "animated in the spirit of Jesus Christ, we value all individuals' unique talents, respect their dignity, and strive to foster their commitment to excellence in our work. Our community's strength depends on the unity and diversity of our people, on the free exchange of ideas, and on learning, living, and working harmoniously." The harmoniousness of the military is being threatened right now, as are other values of respect and commitment to excellence. In seeing that this is taking place, it is clear that changes can and should be made. The deterioration of the military and the ethics that are expected to be seen there is an issue that will not change without work and effort. Those who would have things remain at the current status quo are mostly in charge at this point, but it is still possible to change the way things are for the Army today.
When soldiers and leaders have trouble with ethical behaviors, one also has to question where those troubles originate. In other words, are these behaviors part of the personality of these individuals, have they been learned and mimicked by others, or have they become accepted and expected in the Army to the point that it is odd or unusual not to behave in this manner? If ethics are becoming a thing of the past that is, naturally, something that should be addressed. Removing ethical behavior from the military could cause more serious issues with trust and loyalty than are already being seen, making current problems more significant for the future of the armed forces.
Analysis of the Issues
There are several issues that have to be analyzed. These include the most significant factors regarding the soldiers in the Army, but also the most significant based on the leadership these soldiers currently have. In order to draw any conclusions about these issues, they have to be considered carefully. The issues include:
1. The ethical responsibilities of the leaders of soldiers
2. The ethical responsibilities of the soldiers, themselves
3. A consideration as to whether both leaders and soldiers are moving away from ethical behaviors
4. A consideration as to where the movement away from ethics has originated
5. A willingness to focus on how to address issues with both soldiers and leaders, so that changes can be undertaken.
Overall, an analysis of the issues shows that both soldiers and their leaders are struggling with a lack of ethical behaviors. This is not to say that all soldiers and leaders have trouble with ethics, but only that there are ethical problems in both sections of the military. It is not just a leadership problem or just a soldiering problem (Blackburn, 2001). Instead, it is an all-encompassing, military problem that is plaguing the Army and other branches to the point that something can and should be done. Whether something will be done, however, remains to be seen. There are several ways the problem could be addressed, but it would be necessary for those who are concerned about the problem to make their voices heard more so than they have in the past (Fagothey, 2000; Mondy & Mondy, 2012). If they do not accomplish this, the fate of the…[continue]
"U S Army Ethics The Difficulties With Ethics" (2013, February 01) Retrieved October 28, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/us-army-ethics-the-difficulties-with-85619
"U S Army Ethics The Difficulties With Ethics" 01 February 2013. Web.28 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/us-army-ethics-the-difficulties-with-85619>
"U S Army Ethics The Difficulties With Ethics", 01 February 2013, Accessed.28 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/us-army-ethics-the-difficulties-with-85619
Ohio Army National Guard consists of a plethora of people who are seeking to make a difference in the world they serve. They will honor and protect the United States in all aspects of their life. This is done by using ships and plane to prepare for war or to help others if an epidemic should arise. These individuals are brave individuals who believe in changing lives for the positive
Buffalo Soldiers is a name for a group of soldiers that were initially members of the American 10th Calvary Regiment of the U.S. Army. The group was created on September 21, 1866 in Kansas and was also known as Negro Calvary by the Native American ethic groups that they fought. Despite its initial use to refer to this group, Buffalo Soldiers was extended to include all African-American regiments that were
NCO education prolonged and became solemnized during the decades of 1970s and 1980s. (History of the NCO (from FM 7-22.7)) Many variation in the NCO command structure resulted over the years but perhaps none were as significant as when the Army became an all-volunteer force in 1973. The objective was to create a modern Army upon the principles of personnel management, leadership, and motivation to create a modern Army upon
Notwithstanding the challenges involved, the stakes are high and there is little room for false starts or experimentation; therefore, identifying a general set of best practices that Gambian organizations can follow in developing their own set of sustainable productivity practices represents a valuable and timely undertaking, which relates to the purpose of the study which is discussed further below. Purpose of Study The overall purpose of this study was to study
The subjects were 613 injured Army personnel Military Deployment Services TF Report 13 admitted to Walter Reed Army Medical Center from March 2003 to September 2004 who were capable of completing the screening battery. Soldiers were assessed at approximately one month after injury and were reassessed at four and seven months either by telephone interview or upon return to the hospital for outpatient treatment. Two hundred and forty-three soldiers
(MACV Dir 381-41) This document is one of the first confidential memorandums associated with the Phoenix Program, which details in 1967 the mostly U.S. involvement in counterinsurgency intelligence and activities and discusses the future training and development of South Vietnam forces to serve the same function, that had been supported by the U.S. In civilian (mostly CIA) and military roles. The document stresses that the U.S. role is to
In Bill's case, while he was very enthusiastic, he seems to be relying on his work ethic to help him through the role of manager. While work ethic is definitely helpful, a successful manager needs more than just to be able to work hard, he needs to be able to work "smarter"; namely, he needs to understand that without involving others in his management and effective intrapersonal skills, he