Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Research Paper:
The research, methods will seek to establish a common basement of the U.S. President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process. Equitable regard will be accorded to the state of affairs that exist between the U.S.A. And Iran
Questionnaires are samples of structured questions that will seek directive responses from the respondents in the field of study. In order to arrive at making decisions, there are several considerations that the president of the U.S.A. needs to know from the public and the secretary of state. Such questions will be included in the questionnaires. The questionnaires will be supplied to various respondents. These respondents are thought to have consistent information as regards the U.S. President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process matters in the world. Questionnaires are relevant when it comes to exhausting on the exiting trends of management in the country.
Interviews refer to face-to-face approaches of seeking to elicit information from the concerned parties in the field. The interviews that will be conducted will seek to establish the views of the U.S. citizens. The views will consider many aspects as regards how the country has handled foreign matters and diplomacy in the past and at present. The interviews will solicit equitable data that will enable the researcher. This will enable him/her to dwell on making sure that it has fulfilled the innate responsibilities of getting relevant and up-to-date information in the field.
Interviewing is one of the most influential and functional ways of bringing out relevant views and concerns of the respondents on the topic. Through the interviews, the research will be able to establish common methodologies of decision making by the U.S. president. Moreover, the study research will establish the common approaches of managing the U.S. President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process through involvement of the public. Citizens are indispensable when it comes to ensuring that all the available measures of growth and development have been met. The citizen interaction with other nations is also a contributor of what considerations the president makes as regards foreign policies.
Samples will be collected from various departments. These departments house information concerning how the U.S. President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process is made in the country. Through sampling, the study will seek to relay equitable examples that have been of utmost concern when it comes to management of the internal affairs in the country. In most cases, the research will endeavour into collecting samples of the various decisions that have been made by the present and previous presidents of the U.S.A.
Research on existing texts and theories
One of the foundations that will elicit equitable information to the study is the use of the exiting research materials. These materials relay how the state of affairs has been existing in the U.S.A. And with relation to other nations. The exiting standards of management in the U.S. are categorical of the historical backgrounds set in the past. The validity of this research method will be based on the stability and availability of the past record of work done by the past leadership. According to the research materials that are in the field, it is equitable to know that the state of affairs in the U.S.A. has not been dependent on self-interests and good relations that are forged by the president. The president of the U.S.A. has participated in ensuring growth and development of the diplomatic affairs between his/her nation and other states in the world
From the existing texts and written papers, it is evident that all the available materials try to establish how the president makes decisions based on the old states of work. In order to bring out the immediate and past methods of management, the study will reiterate on the validity and reliability of history in order to understand the state of decision-making protocols in the country
. The present trends of decision making by the president are dependent on what the past leaders decided. For instance, the decision made by President Bush is rudimentary and influential to what President Obama will make as regards Iran. Iran has been in constant battles with the U.S.A. In many perceptions. Therefore, the history will be relevant in relaying what the future prospects and decisions have to take and points of concern
Summary and synthesis of the arguments and findings
The existence and stability of the international relations between the U.S.A. And Iran are replicated on the nature of activities between these two nations. On order to arrive at a fulfillment that all the two nations are in good terms, the presidents are the figurative agents who supply decisions that affect on one another. The summary of the research will reiterate on measures to be taken as concerns the U.S. President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process. This will happen with regard to Iran and many other nations. Moreover, the arguments will be given a summative conclusion based on the nature or state of internal and external affairs between the U.S.A. And Iran.
U.S. - Iran Relations: An Analytic Compendium of U.S. Policies, Laws, and Regulations
The relationship between Iran and the U.S.A. continues to be on a struggle. The U.S.A. has been imposing sanctions on the government of Iran for the past years. This generation of hate and hostility has strained the presidential policies between the two nations. Little engagements are of any profit between these two nations. Distrust has resulted in immediate hate between the people of the two nations. Studies indicate that the present sense of imagination and treatment received from the opponent nations deserves a lot to make the two countries differ. The attacks of 9/11 are related to the tense relationship between the two countries.
The study will resolve around handling a number of research questions. These are questions directed at reflecting on the innate correspondences and management details contained in the U.S. foreign policy decision-making processes. Moreover, the study endeavors to use a number of questions that are related to the relationship between the U.S.A. And other nations like Iran. The following are the study questions:
The U.S. president uses a number of considerations in order to influence on the policies touching the U.S.A. And Iran
The U.S. presidential policy takes the form of the Mexican presidential decision making process. Iran offers a vivid example through which the president of the united state has to involve numerous considerations in the society. The Mexican revolution of 1910 was the war that saw men, women and children pulling together to see a new dawn of liberation; the Mexicans and Americans were already tired with the dictatorship that the then president was subjecting them to; the foreigners were getting by far better treatment than the Mexicans themselves. At the very start of his regime, everyone knew Diaz to have good intentions for Iran, he helped create stability and bring crimes to a low level in the country, however, after a while he lost track and turned into a dictatorship. The most contagious issue according to the Mexicans was that land companies were taking control of extensive tracks of land. These are land pieces that belonged to Mexicans this was going to render up to 97% of them landless. The U.S. presidential decision making on Iran takes this avenue where numerous considerations have to be met by the president.
In a bid to have their grievances addressed, the Mexicans resorted to fight that Porfirio's regime. The government was further accused of neglect in addressing public service issues and needs of the middle and lower classes. The youth, as opposed to their parents, could not hold their patience anymore
. The likes of Madero and his team are being remembered for their effort in bringing back to normalcy the lives of many Mexicans. Their courage and selflessness is what remains to be remembered; despite the fact that they had no army in the first place, he had education and resources, he still could see the importance of counteracting the violation of human rights by the Diaz government. The decision-making process was marked by innate consideration of the many factors of production in the country. The diplomatic existence between the U.S.A. And Iran deserves planned protocols that ensure cordial existence between these two nations.
In an oversight, Diaz had a team that saw that they objectively remained in power for as long as they wanted, this heightened the anger in the stewards of democracy. Madero a serious one, declared his fight against Diaz's dictatorship and in November 1910 while in exile at the United States, he denounced the re-election of Diaz as the president, went ahead and declared himself the president. This marked the turning point of Diaz's politics of dictatorship. Madero's ascension to power was never an easy one. In the first place, he was facing a dictator whose power is backed by resources and a wide network of influential politicians and businesspersons who sided with him. The success of the lethal existence…[continue]
"U S President Foreign Policy Decision" (2013, March 07) Retrieved October 28, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/us-president-foreign-policy-decision-86492
"U S President Foreign Policy Decision" 07 March 2013. Web.28 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/us-president-foreign-policy-decision-86492>
"U S President Foreign Policy Decision", 07 March 2013, Accessed.28 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/us-president-foreign-policy-decision-86492
U.S. President After every four years millions of Americans go to the polls to choose a new leader in a free and open elections. The candidates nominated during the preceding summer at the conventions of their respective political parties' wages vigorous campaigns. They make their point-of-view through the media of radio, television, newspapers, and magazines on both national and international affairs. On Inauguration Day, January 20, the successful candidate for
U.S. Agricultural Policy Agriculture and Farmer United States Government Policy: Agriculture and Farmers Government Policy towards Agriculture and Farmer's Price Supports There are a number of similar economic problems that are faced by the farmers globally. These problems include acquisition of land, modification of farm production to price variations and maintenance of foreign markets (Wilcox & Cochrane, 1960). During World War I and even after its conclusion, farmers in United States were asked over to
U.S. involvement in Vietnam remains one of the most controversial actions the U.S. government has ever undertaken. It has divided the country like never before. The divisions took place along political, class, and racial lines. Partly because of the inability of the U.S. To win the war and partly because many thought the war was wrong and even immoral, politicians sharply divided over the war. Many Americans resisted the draft,
Foreign Policy Nixon's Detente Description Detente was a cooling down, or thaw, among America, Russia and China's arms' race (Detente). The United States and Russia could either slow their weapons production or continue the arms race, which, people feared could end in a devastating war (Detente, CNN). Nixon and Henry Kissinger worked secretly on Detente at summit meetings in Beijing and Moscow. President Gerald Ford signed on to Detente in Helsinki in 1975.
The Goals and Outcome of American Diplomacy It is also worthwhile to analyze the goals and outcome of American diplomacy during the war. The primary goals of United States in the initial period of the war were to contain and defeat the totalitarian and expansionist powers of Germany and Japan, preferably without getting directly involved in the war. After its direct entry in the war, the U.S. policy was focused on
The South Vietnamese authorities had been fighting the Vietcong communist guerilla forces from the North which were later replaced by the more powerful North Vietnam army. The U.S. had entered the war with the intention of stopping the North Vietnamese communist regime from overtaking South Vietnam. During the 1959-1975 period millions of Vietnamese and tens of thousands of U.S. soldiers had been killed as a result of the war. The
The Panama Canal Treaty along with the Treaty on the Permanent Neutrality of the canal, both affirmed that the United States would transfer control of the canal to Panama by the year 2000. After this Panama would keep the canal neutral, and both countries would be responsible for protecting it. With Vietnam a recent memory, Carter and Linowitz hoped their spirit of cooperation toward Panama could usher in a new