Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from essay:
Thorndike, Joseph J. "The IRS Is Hiding Its History." The Washington Times.
December 19, 1997, p. A23. February 18, 2008. http://www.taxhistory.org/thp/readings.nsf/cf7c9c870b600b9585256df80075b9dd/9de7fcd59915a3be85256e430079327d?OpenDocument
After 9/11, the Federal Reserve Bank, then led by Alan Greenspan, used monetary policy reduced the interest rate, or the rate that consumers must pay to borrow money. This did encourage individuals to spend more. However, it is still debatable if this was the most vital component in extricating America from the throws of economic recession. Government spending, or fiscal as opposed to monetary policy, is often seen as a more direct and superior way to rapidly change economic conditions. Fiscal policy was required to stimulate America's recovery from the Great Depression, according to conventional wisdom, although some still argue that it was the Hoover administration's monetary policy that was ineffective, not that monetary policy was ineffective altogether.
But most economists believe that, to get the economy 'moving' again, spending by the government works -- there is no question about it, whether spending on infrastructure, as occurred during the New Deal or on armaments during World War II. Arguably, the spending on public works is not simply a stimulus for individuals to spend more and make them secure in their jobs, but can make private commerce more effective. However, the government may run into problems if it spends too much during times of prosperity, and then must deal with the bureaucratic 'fall out' of having to cut back pet projects and programs. In other words, government spending is a difficult genie to put back in the bottle, although it has been a necessary genie, given that monetary policy alone may be ineffective. Also, if the government's spending is not managed wisely, it can 'tip' the economy into inflation. Theoretically, the government can cut back to hem in inflation, but this is not always politically feasible. And finally, "the effects of any fiscal policy are not the same on everyone. Depending on the political orientations and goals of the policymakers, a tax cut could affect only the middle class, which is typically the largest economic group. In times of economic decline and rising taxation, it is this same group that may have to pay more taxes than the wealthier upper class' (Heakal 2008)
Heakal, Reem. "What is fiscal policy?" Investopedia. October 22, 2008. http://www.investopedia.com/articles/04/051904.asp
Fairness does matter when creating a tax system. In terms of a consumption tax, the poor often consume more than the rich, at least in terms of a percentage of their income. While for a wealthy individual, much of his income can be locked up in assets, making money off of money, for a poor individual, the bulk of his or her income is devoted to buying necessary goods, including rent and food. The consumption tax taxes everyone equally on the surface, regardless of how someone has benefited from the economic system of a particular society, and actually favors those who can allocate their income to sectors of the economy that are not taxed (such as investments, which are not technically consumption).
A flat tax, where everyone pays the same amount, has similar problems in terms of allocating wealth. 15% of a poor person's income, a person who must pay for his or her rent, food, and necessities out of his or her weekly paycheck, means more to that individual than 15% of an income where much of that income can be devoted to investments and luxuries. While not as unfair as a consumption tax as investment income is also taxed, a flat tax is still unfair, and finding the right percentage to finance government operations yet not to be prohibitively costly for the poorest members of society is a difficult balance to strike. The only good thing about the flat tax is its simplicity, as along with the consumption tax as it requires less bureaucracy to enforce. Bureaucracy is expensive as well as frustrating (as anyone who has ever had to fill out a tax form beyond the standard EZ-file well knows!).
The progressive tax, while not perfect, is messier, but like democracy itself, some messiness must be tolerated for a more fair system. By gradating the tax brackets, legislators have more tools to tinker with, so they can increase the burden of taxes upon the rich if society becomes too concentrated at the top in terms of its wealth, and redistribute that wealth to the bottom. Deductions on income tax forms allow legislators to favor certain business practices (such as staring up a company in an underprivileged area) and behaviors (like saving for retirement) than others. The progressive system of taxation is ultimately better for all, because the poorest do not become so poor as to become a burden upon society, in terms of class-based anger and the multiple psychological and physical illnesses of society, and so that they can continue to remain a functional part of the economy, funneling their dollars to keep the economy 'alive' by consuming goods and services as well as providing them to others.[continue]
"U S Tax Policy Although Smokers" (2008, October 24) Retrieved October 26, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/us-tax-policy-although-mokers-27362
"U S Tax Policy Although Smokers" 24 October 2008. Web.26 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/us-tax-policy-although-mokers-27362>
"U S Tax Policy Although Smokers", 24 October 2008, Accessed.26 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/us-tax-policy-although-mokers-27362
Even proponents of medical legalization concede marijuana cannot cure or even alleviate the symptoms of MS or glaucoma, merely act as a narcotic. True, other narcotics exist on the market today -- and like marijuana, they are also addictive. Whether they are more or less addictive than marijuana remains uncertain, but advocates say the chronically ill should be able to choose what works best for them while opponents say
Health Public Good Public Health as a Public Good The United States has one of the lowest cost food options available to its consumers in the world. For an extended period, people assumed that this was a benefit of capitalism and that competition had helped push down the prices and made food available at lower costs through the market. However, many externalities have arisen in these circumstances that are now pointing researchers
Lesbian Health Care Lesbian Health Issues in a Heterosexual Society The additional burdens placed on the lives of minorities as a result of social exclusion can lead to health disparities. Social exclusion theory has been used in previous research to investigate the health disparities that exist between socioeconomic classes and individuals of different ethnic backgrounds living in the United States, but it has not yet been applied to another important minority group:
Swedish Health Care System All over the world, governments approach their social responsibilities from a wide range of perspectives. For instance, for many industrialized nations, health care is taken to be an example of a social program tailored to benefit the general public. Hence in that regard, the relevance of a well designed health care system cannot be overstated. This paper takes Sweden as a reference point in seeking to map
Healthy Employee Pay Less for Insurance Premiums? Statement of the Issue The objective of this work is to examine whether the healthy employee should contribute less towards their health insurance premium than employees who are less healthy. Employers are more often offering wellness and health promotion programs focused on promoting good health among their employees and employee's families. Driving this movement is the rising cost of health insurance, as well as
The competition is tough all the way around, and companies are tight financially in making ends meet for all employees that are trying to help others survive around the globe (Peto, Darby, Deo, Silcocks, Whitley, & Doll, 2000). Public health priorities are an issue that could arise at any given time in trying to get adults to stop smoking. For example, if an emergency occurs with someone who has received
Americas Coalition Puts Marijuana Legalization Up for Discussion. Retrieved from the New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/18/world/americas/nations-in-americas-urged-to-consider-legalizing-pot.html?_r=0 Bakalar, N. (2006). Marijuana as Medicine: Consider the Pros and Cons,. The Mayo Clinic . Lawrence Genen, M.M. (2012). Cannabis Compound Abuse. Medscape Reference . National Instritute of Health. (2012, December). DrugFacts: Marijuana. Retrieved from National Institute on Drug Abuse: http://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/marijuana Considering the magnitude of the worldwide illicit drug trade and its impact on the United States, take