Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Research Paper:
Human health is delicate and working in fields that deal with such aspect requires the utmost sensitivity and accuracy among other positive elements. The modern world is, characterized by widespread use of computerized equipment. The ability of these devices and functions to present professional with the required positive features is very apparent. The use of these devices in the medical field comes in a variety of aspects, say in the use of Electronic Health Records. This evolving idea, constituting a structured assortment of electronic health information on populations or individual patients, have, exposed some patients to medical risks, rather than facilitation the solution to problems. The accuracy of this feature, as opposed to expectations, is not a guarantee. The case in which a Primary Care Physician (CPC), presents a wrong prescription to a patient leading to a near fatal prescription overdose constitute an example of the danger that the failure of these electronic systems can cause in the medical scenario. These problems emanate from issues with the design of the applications and therefore changes to these designs can help eliminate the errors. As presented in this discussion, Electronic Health Records Usability Analysis serves as an avenue for the elimination of these errors.
How EHR Usability Errors Affect Patient Safety and Care
Usability of Electronic Health Records relates to the efficiency and effectiveness together with the satisfaction with which the systems permit different users to achieve different sets of tasks within the medical environment. EHR usability has implications on the quality of care that medical practitioners have institutions presents to patients in addition to influencing patient safety especially in emergencies. When these systems fall short of the usability test, they cause medical errors and this can be a factor of many triggers for instance system design. Usability errors in EHR affect the quality of patient care and safety in a variety of dimensions. In medical facilities, the large volume of patients, rapid turnover, and large patient's disparities call for the use of devices with the capacity to handle all these features at the same time and so, the EHR is supposed to take care of this. One of the inefficiencies that these systems have is the inability of feedback mechanisms over the safety issues that emerge in the systems. Because of this shortcoming, which relates to lack of certification, medical practitioners are not able to find avenues for making designers the areas of safety concerns associated with the application of the tools.
The design of these systems has also failed to take care of the extensively intricate information needs in the health sectors. The needs, which have financial, clinical, operations and administrative characteristics, differ from one environment to the other. The design of the software therefore, needs to take care of the needs of diverse clinical groups and demands. Because of the lack of this capability, the EHR, the medical who frequently move from one work environment to the other feel the inconveniences. This translates to their ineffectiveness in offering their patients the appropriate kind of care. The lack of these systems hinders effective testing, diagnosis and prescriptions to patients. In the case provided, the wrong prescription that the patient in question used may have to be because of the pharmacist incapability to use a system in a different setting or the lack of feedback mechanisms and capabilities among other inefficiencies.
Changing the Design to Prevent Errors In The Future
Considering that the majority of errors that occur in the EHR are design related, the need for a change in the design of these tools is evident. These changes ought to complement the existing issues of design in the system with the view of dealing with the problems that emerges with from these design inefficiencies. With reference to the issues of system feedback, the design of these systems ought to institute a forgiveness and feedback structure. This will provide room for users of the system to explore them with the view of improving them. In addition, it eliminates the fear that some disastrous results and accidental cost may occur during the exploration process. A good feedback mechanism is also significant in informing users of the effects of the activities they undertake within the system prior to those actions. Moreover, these facilitate the recovery of blunders and restore confidence in making certain that their actions have had the intended outcome.
In addition to the enhancement of feedback capabilities,…[continue]
"Usability Analysis Human Health Is Delicate And" (2013, July 28) Retrieved October 22, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/usability-analysis-human-health-is-delicate-93570
"Usability Analysis Human Health Is Delicate And" 28 July 2013. Web.22 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/usability-analysis-human-health-is-delicate-93570>
"Usability Analysis Human Health Is Delicate And", 28 July 2013, Accessed.22 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/usability-analysis-human-health-is-delicate-93570
There needs to be a balance between spending only the money that is necessary while at the same time making sure that all the necessary milestones and performance measures are met. Going too cheap on such metrics will lead to inopportune shortages and other calamities while spending too much time or money leads to waste and more pressing and urgent issues getting delayed or even missed. The author of this