Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
(Rebehn M.) Another example from the 1700's of the use of bacterial agent in war was in the conflict between Russia and Sweden in 1710. There are reports that the Russians used the bodies of plague victim to create an epidemic among the enemy. (HISTORY of BIOLOGICAL WARFARE)
There is also the infamous incident in American history of the intentional infection of the native Indians with smallpox. "An English general, Sir Jeffery Amherst, surreptitiously provided the Indians loyal to the French with blankets infected with smallpox virus. The resulting epidemic decimated the Indians." (HISTORY of BIOLOGICAL WARFARE)
2.3. The modern technological era and weapons of mass destruction.
With the advent of the modern industrial age there was a rapid development of technology. This was also to lead to the equally rapid growth in the development of even more and more destructive and indiscriminate weapons of destruction. The most well-known and widely documented is the first truly modern use of chemicals and other weapons of mass destruction in the First World War. With the development of chemical techniques and technologies the biological weapons could now be synthetically and more easily produced in large quantities, which resulted in more accessible and devastating weapons of mass destruction.
In the First World War there is for example documented proof that "...German agents inoculated horses and cattle with glanders disease in the United States before they were shipped to France." (HISTORY of BIOLOGICAL WARFARE)
However the true nature and awesome power of chemicals was seen in the use of mustard gas as a weapon by both sides in the war. " in 1915 the Germans used mustard gases at the village of Langemarck." (Rebehn M.)
Both France and Britain also used this devastating gas in the war and it is estimated that by 1918, "...one in every four artillery shells fired contained gas of one type or another." (Rebehn M.)
Furthermore, the German's used chlorine gas as well. "As a result of one chlorine gas attack, five thousand persons were killed and about ten thousand were injured. The Germans ejected chlorine from 5730 balloons containing about 168 tons of chlorine within the 5 to 8-minute duration of the attack." (Weapons of mass destruction) it should, also be noted that chemical were not the only instruments of mass destruction that this war was to initiate. It was also the first are war tot extensively use aircraft and mass bombing as a weapon of terror, as well as the firs time that tanks were used.
The Second World War was to accelerate the relationship between technology and weapons of mass destruction. There is little doubt that the popular notion and concept of weapons of mass destruction took hold of the public consciousnesses during World War Two after the use of the atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima (August 6, 1945) and Nagasaki (August 9, 1945). (Weapons of mass destruction) the lethal destructive potential of the weapons of mass destruction and humanities arsenal of weapons was increased in 1949 when the a-bomb was created in the U.S.S.R. (Weapons of mass destruction)
There is an obvious and easily identifiable link between the development of human technology and the increase in weapons of mass destruction. In each age in human history maximum use has been made technology that is at the disposal of that time to create the most lethal weapons possible. While the term "weapons of mass destruction' is one which has only emerged recently in history, there has been a continuous development of these weapons since ancient times.
One of the issues and the central controversies that surround these weapons is that they target people indiscriminately and they often aim to inflict destruction on the entire population and not just on the opposing enemy's soldieries. The second characteristic that is often seen in historical accounts is the ability of these weapons to create psychological terror. As this paper has attempted to show, the earlier forms of these weapons were limited by the technologies of the time and their destructive capabilities were generally comparatively mild compared to the large and super-destructive weapons created by modern technology. However, history has also shown that technology is not always the main determinant in the amount of destructive power of these weapons. The spread of bubonic plague across Europe is one example of this fact. Another is the way that "low-tech" weapons which do not necessarily use all the high-end technologies of the time, can be horribly effective. A case in point is the use of box-cutters and hijacking aircraft in the terrorist attack on New York in 2001. In the final analysis it is not necessarily technology that makes weapons of mass destruction so dangerous but rather aims and intensions of human beings who use these weapons.
HISTORY of BIOLOGICAL WARFARE. Retrieved 17 February, 2007, at http://www.gulfwarvets.com/biowar.htm
History of Epidemics and Plagues (2001) Retrieved 17 February, 2007, at http://uhavax.hartford.edu/bugl/histepi.htm
Johnson T.J. A History of Biological Warfare from 300 B.C.E. To the Present.
Retrieved 17 February, 2007, at http://www.aarc.org/resources/biological/history.asp
Origin of the Phrase Weapons of Mass Destruction. Retrieved 17 February, 2007, at http://www.cnsnews.com/facts/2006/facts2006215.asp
Rebehn M. The Long History of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Retrieved 17 February, 2007, at http://www.opendemocracy.net/theme_9-wmd/article_964.jsp
Weapons of mass destruction. Retrieved 17 February, 2007, at http://www.answers.com/topic/weapons-of-mass-destruction
Who coined the term "weapons of mass destruction"? Retrieved 17 February, 2007, at http://ask.yahoo.com/20040106.html
WMD: They're History. Retrieved 17 February, 2007, at http://ancienthistory.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.msnbc.com/news/972460.asp[continue]
"Weapons Of Mass Destruction Before" (2007, February 20) Retrieved October 28, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/weapons-of-mass-destruction-before-39934
"Weapons Of Mass Destruction Before" 20 February 2007. Web.28 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/weapons-of-mass-destruction-before-39934>
"Weapons Of Mass Destruction Before", 20 February 2007, Accessed.28 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/weapons-of-mass-destruction-before-39934
Weapons of Mass Destruction and the Next Terror: Assessment of How a Significant Terrorist WMD Attack Might Be Conducted by a Non-State Actors Perpetrator and Why They Can't Stage an Attack Weapons of Mass Destructions (WMD) have considerable effect to the economies of both developed and developing countries. In the modern world, most terror groups have resolved to use Weapons of Mass Destruction to harm their enemies. The entire syndicate comprises
By continuing with a "business as usual" attitude, the terrorists would not have a long-term psychological impact on American society, culture and economic development. While the long-term psychological impact appears to be the most prominent value that a weapon of mass destruction has for a terrorist, it seems reasonable to argue that these weapons also serve as a means for terrorist groups to have their political voices heard. Terrorist attacks
Richard Butler's; "The Greatest Threat: Iraq, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and the Crisis of Global Security." The writer of this paper analyzes the book's content and measures it against the current U.S. foreign policies. There was one source used to complete this paper. When the Soviet Union began to dismantle and the Berlin Wall came down the United States breathed a sigh of relief as it appeared the threat of
North Korea WMD The weapons of mass destruction problem in North Korea is characterized by a number of geographic and political issues. North Korea (the Democratic Peoples' Republic of Korea, or DPRK). In January of 2003, North Korea has withdrawn from the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (Chanda and Evans, 2003; Kyong-Soo Kim). In addition, North Korea has developed long-range missiles, and recent reports suggest that the country is now the "world's largest
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htchem/articles/20060324.aspx Anthrax When we think of warfare and terrorist attacks, we tend to think of large destructive pieces of machinery -- nuclear missiles and/or bombs, improvised explosive devices (IEDs), and even the still-too-recent memory of massive airplanes being turned from passenger vehicles into weapons. Not all forces of mass death and destruction come in large packages, however. In the years following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, several small, standard
Nuclear Weapons Knowing why states build nuclear weapons is important for us in order to determine the future of international security and to direct foreign policy efforts in such a way so as to limit the spread of such dangerous armaments. Nuclear weapons are explosives which derive their ability to destroy from chemical reactions, either fission or fusion or a combination of both reactions. These reactions release an enormous quantity of
Bioterrorism Biological weapons can significantly change the battlefield. Today's leaders must always be on the watch for new threats that can arise in newly designed ways. The enemy is always planning to expose weaknesses in the defense. Biological weaponry is such a technology that can bring devastating effects and exploit weaknesses both tactically and strategically. The purpose of this essay is to examine the appeal of biological weapons to terrorist organizations.