Human beings perceive events, individuals, and objects in different manners in relation to the circumstances and understanding. This is vital towards the development of concept of reality with the aim of continuous leadership, caring, and forms of goodness. This is an indication that human beings believe in whatever they see and purport to be ideal thus generation of meaning and form of understanding or knowledge for the purposes of guidance and leadership. Various personalities have focused on the examination of the concept of collapsing uncertainties. Some of these personalities include Timothy Eves, Plato, and Sartre. Sartre focuses on the examination of the concept of hell or the world of darkness through integration of the No Exit play. This is ideal for effective understanding and development of the forms of goodness in relation to reality and knowledge. Sartre discusses the aspect of existentialism. According to Sartre, Existentialism refers to the primary reaction with reference to the traditional philosophical approach aiming to understand the behavior of human beings effectively and efficiently in the modern society (Jean-Paul Sartre et al. p. 42).
This is through extensive examination of the cultures, traditions, laws, and regulations for the purposes understanding the behavior of human beings in the modern and future worlds. Sartre utilizes three identities in the form of Garcin, Inez, and Estelle. On the other hand, Plato utilizes the concept of the cave and prisoners in relation to the allegory of the cave. The main objective of Plato in this context is to determine the aspects of perceptions and reality as vital in the development of forms of goodness with reference to effective and efficient leadership. Timothy also integrates the concept of the cave to examine the concept of collapsing uncertainties in the modern society. These examinations are vital for appropriate understanding of the behavior of human beings in the modern society as an essential component towards enhancing the effectiveness of leadership in addressing the needs and preferences of the society (Jean-Paul Sartre et al. p. 76).
This relates to the concept expressed in the context of No Exit in the examination of the aspect of existentialism. Existentialism refers to the primary reaction in relation to the traditional philosophical approach with the aim or objective of critically understanding the behavior of human beings in the modern society. Existentialists focus on the examination of the individual human beings with reference to the evaluation of cultures, traditions, regulations, and laws. The setting for the No Exit is perfect for the laboratory examination of three separate individuals divorce from the world and the people they knew. When individuals are left within the context of the room/cell their actions and feelings are vital in the examination and definition of who they are across the globe. This is an expression of the events facing Europe in relation to the case of birth rate below the essence of 2.1 children per woman. The lack of mirrors in the context of the closed room focuses on the amplification of the situation. Each individual has the ability to choose (Jean-Paul Sartre et al. p. 81). This opportunity to choose is vital in the definition of who they are in relation to personal or interpersonal interactions towards the process of making the critical decision.
Sartre focuses on the examination of the concept of existence through the actions of three persons: Garcin, Estelle, and Inez. Since these individuals have recently died, they have the ability to confront their existence with reference to consciousness. This is because the physical bodies are buried on earth. In the analysis of the concept of existentialism, Sartre implements the aspect of Descartes' method of posing the cogito. This indicates that individuals' consciousness and other parts of the individual observing the consciousness generate a 'menage a trois'. In this situation, each individual must ignore or accept the judgment of the other two persons. For instance, during the first encounter, Inez says that Garcin's mouth looks frightened. The absence of mirrors in the room forces Garcin to decide if Inez is right or accept his thought about himself as right. In this scenario, Garcin believes in Inez analysis and expression rather than his own judgment. Garcin lets Inez to define his essence or individual characteristics, thus in the definition by Sartre, this is a reflection of bad faith.
According to the analysis of Sartre, hell is not so much a specific place, but an illustration of a state of mind through delay in the explanation of the drawing room. Sartre focuses on the utilization of the Second Empire furniture in the demonstration of the concept that hell is not something accessible to the contemporary French audience despite the existence of hell on earth. This is mainly related to the writings during the German occupation of Paris. Sartre was involved in the resistance thus frightening possibility in the illustration of the presence of the Gestapo (Jean-Paul Sartre et al. p. 84). The play was performed in the context of 1944, three months prior to the liberation of Paris by the allied forces. Following the aspect of humiliation and despair in relation to the occupation of the city by the Germans for four years, Sartre, in No Exit, undoubtedly developed the thinking that Paris was the hell on earth.
Sartre score heavily in the utilization or exploitation of the theatrical technique of exposition in the introduction of the characters to the audience. This is through placing of the characters in strange and unusual situation. The development of the plot focuses on the demonstration of the three characters with the ability to illustrate how they died and their feeling of the room or hell without reflection of awkwardness. The majors themes are essential in the development of the plot from the onset. For instance, in the first section, despite the fact that the characters are already dead and have nothing to hide, they pretend and lie to themselves. In the development of the plot, Garcin lies or pretends in demonstration that the furniture is shocking. Estelle pretends or lies to her and others that she is in hell by mistake. Expression of Estelle's first impression that Garcin was her dead lover foreshadows the presentation of their future relationship. This occurs with the haunting presence of Inez looking on lustfully. This is vital in the expression of the theme of the triangular desire with three people operating from the same room.
In the second section of the interaction, Sartre focuses on the promotion of the theme of self-deception in relation to the development of the plot. Despite the fact that the characters are already dead, it still beats logic as to why Estelle and Garcin do not want to admit the reasons why they are in hell. There is nothing to lose by admitting to the truth. The two fails to express aspects of honest thus inability to articulate even the most obvious truth as to why they are in hell. Within the context of the room, Inez is true to her actions thus demanding that the other two characters to drop play-acting and throw the dust into each other's eyes. Play-acting is applicable in the development of the plot as an expression of the artificial setting of the play to facilitate operations and reflection of the actors with the aim of demonstrating the themes (Jean-Paul Sartre et al. p. 87). This is an expression that there is no way out for the aspect of self-deception in the development of the plot.
The second section of the play focuses on the demonstration of the theme of existence and essence. In the expression of this theme, Sartre focuses on the utilization of the case of Estelle, who does not think that she really exists unless she can see herself. She lacks the ability to create and trust her own judgment. She relies on external object in the creation of essences in relation to verification of the concept of her existence. This is an illustration of the aspect of bad faith as in the case of demographic suicide. In this expression, Estelle fails to define her essence. According to Sartre, individual consciousness is free to choose any character or essence in relation to assumption of responsibility for the aspect of freedom. Estelle lacks this ability thus utilizes Inez as her mirror in the development of essence. This relates to her constant allegations of being consciously painful with her being. It is ideal to note that suffering is an essential or vital stage in relation to affirmation of the existence of an individual thus the concept of beginning of life in the other side of despair.
The second section is also essential in the illustration of the concept that hell is a reflection of other people. It is ideal to note that Inez fails to act as an effective and efficient mirror while looking at Estelle. This is because of diversity in…