Court Order, Discusses When Court Term Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
650
Cite

At this time the court may decide to vacate the TRO or to convert it into a preliminary injunction. (Ibid.) What is a Court Order Used for?

A court order may be used for:

Restraining a party from changing the status quo until the decision of the court;

To provide temporary relief to an aggrieved party; or Facilitate the smooth functioning of a trial through, for example, clarification of a law typical example of an interim court order to maintain status quo is the issuance of a TRO or a Temporary Protective Order (TPO) in a case of domestic violence to prevent any further violence or threat of violence by a spouse.

Examples of providing temporary relief may occur in family law trials in which temporary child custody, rights of visitation, spousal support and/or maintenance are ordered by the court pending final judgments.

Court orders that facilitate the functioning of a trial include ordering a reluctant...

...

(Ibid.)
Works Cited

Court Order-Legal Definition." NOLO. 2005.February 26, 2005. http://www.nolo.com/definition.cfm/term/BAD348F5-097A-4342-A6C7B6A977528C3D

Court Order." Wikipedia the Free Encyclopedia. 2005.February 26, 2005. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_order

Such as a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) or an Injunction

The difference between Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) and Injunction is that an injunction may be temporary or permanent while TRO is always temporary; secondly, although most injunctions, like TROs are orders that restrain action by a party, some injunctions may order a party to carry out a positive act.

Status quo is a Latin term meaning to "keep things the way they presently are."

Court Order

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Court Order-Legal Definition." NOLO. 2005.February 26, 2005. http://www.nolo.com/definition.cfm/term/BAD348F5-097A-4342-A6C7B6A977528C3D

Court Order." Wikipedia the Free Encyclopedia. 2005.February 26, 2005. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_order

Such as a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) or an Injunction

The difference between Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) and Injunction is that an injunction may be temporary or permanent while TRO is always temporary; secondly, although most injunctions, like TROs are orders that restrain action by a party, some injunctions may order a party to carry out a positive act.


Cite this Document:

"Court Order Discusses When Court" (2005, February 28) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/court-order-discusses-when-court-62547

"Court Order Discusses When Court" 28 February 2005. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/court-order-discusses-when-court-62547>

"Court Order Discusses When Court", 28 February 2005, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/court-order-discusses-when-court-62547

Related Documents

Court Analysis Justice and Court Administration Administration and management of courts is filled with challenges. Often depending upon the geographical context of the court, such challenges will include resource shortage, a perpetual docket of criminal cases and the broader complexity of providing civil order and justice to communities while balancing constitutional law and local ordinance. Moreover, the complexity of administering justice in and of itself plays a part in the difficulty of

Court Services Management
PAGES 5 WORDS 1436

Court Service Management How does a court system cope with a changing of the guard when a new administration is elected and key executives and managers are replaced, and/or when policy changes direction as a new political party assumes power? The court deals with transitions of power by maintaining the established traditions and principles from the Constitution. This is used to ensure that case precedent is respected and to provide stability for

Robertson illustrated his point about the dangers of the Supreme Court's power anecdotally, such as when, later in the book he talks about the McCain-Feingold Bill which was designed to restrict campaign finance and reform the ways political campaigns were funded both privately and via government assistance. Although the Republicans in neither the Legislative or Executive branch supported the bill, they agreed to pass it in order to end the

But if Houston insisted that Plessy be enforced that is, if the NAACP sued a state to make its schools for black children equal to those for whites which Plessy did require then he could undermine segregation. (Jomills Henry Braddock. A Long-Term View of School Desegregation: Some Recent Studies of Graduates as Adults. Phi Delta Kappan. 259-61. 1984) He reasoned that states would either have to build new schools for

As the text by Thompson indicates, one of the crucial dimensions of the Biblical Worldview is its attention to the relationships formed between men. The interest in assuring justice in the affairs between individuals, this view holds, is part and parcel to the interest of protecting God's morality through the court of law. This strikes us as particularly important in the case of White v. Gibbs because it helps us

U.S.C. § 48 is not aimed at specific instances of animal cruelty, but specifically at the creation and distribution of depictions of such abuse for the purposes of interstate and/or foreign commerce. This is the act that the appellant was unarguably engaging in when apprehended by law enforcement, and the fact that the law is not aimed at those participating directly in acts of animal cruelty does not in