Hobbes Vs. Descartes Term Paper

Philosophy Thomas Hobbes believed that all matter was in motion and would remain in that state until and unless another force changed it (Hobbes 1651). He saw that thought reflected the motion of things in the material world and affected the senses and the brain until this new motions degraded a previous one. To Hobbes, 1) everything, including the mind and the soul, is material; 2) man is born with a blank or tabula rasa mind; and 3) all mental activity proceeded from the senses.

Hobbes established a hierarchy of abstract thought levels. At the base was the representation or appearance, the first motion transmitted by the senses to the brain. Upon entry into the brain, it followed a "trayne (Hobbes)," which was the course of its motion in interacting with other representations. The power or influence of each motion decreased as it interacted, and he called this interaction imagination, which he viewed as the "first internal beginning of all Voluntary Motion." All the different traynes in the mind at one time and not yet deteriorating constituted memory.

He established the distinct types of imagination as the simple and the compound: simple, referring to particular traynes; and compound, the interaction among separate traynes. Individual traynes were either regulated or unguided. Unguided traynes were free from passion or desire, while regulated traynes were influenced by passion or desire.

He perceived that imagination changed form from "mere mental discourse" to a verbal discourse through speech. From this, he established that understanding was conception caused by speech (Hobbes). It was not a separate function or level of cognition, but a particular group of traynes, initiated by one's exposure to the sense of speech.

Hobbes viewed reason as conceiving the sum total - of a series of parts, a remainder from subtraction,...

...

Voluntary Motions affected the inner organs of a person, and different stimuli resulted in different types of Voluntary Motions, which he called endeavors. Endeavors directed at an external object turned into a desire or aversion. The highest cognitive level, the will, translated the desire or aversion into physical motion.
Summarizing, Hobbes saw all things, including thought, as material. Ironically, he also maintained that human beings actually never experienced the true materiality of what they sensed (Hobbes). Sense was an external conveyor that made its way through the nerves, other stings and body membranes, towards the brain and the heart, where a resistance developed into an expression of itself. The appearance was fancy or a dream, which was one thing and the object of it was another. Hobbes skeptically believed that all human or life experience was really and merely a perception and that no one could ever acquire real knowledge of this material world (Hobbes).

In contrast, Rene Descartes thought that the human mind and God were alike in that both could think but had no physical realities (Chew 1996). He believed, though, that God created the universe and held the sole power in maintaining it. The difference was that the human mind, though distinct from God, was finite and dependent on God, Who was infinite and did not depend on anything outside Himself for existence.

Descarte also held some kind of movement in the human mind's reaction to external events. External motions affected the nerves, displacing central ends and rearranging "interfibrillar" space, and, in the process, animal spirits were directed into the nerves (Chew). Descartes believed that the rational soul was distinct from the body, and that the soul and the body…

Sources Used in Documents:

Bibliography

Chew, Robert. (1992) Rene Descartes, French Philosopher. Lucid Interactive. http://www.lucidcafe.com/library/96Mar/descartes.html

European Graduate School EGS. Rene Descartes. Media and Communications Division. http://www.egs.edu/descartes.html

Garber, Daniel. (2003) Rene Descartes. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge. Retrieved March 3, 2004 at http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/DAO26SECT5

Hobbes, Thomas. (1651) Leviathan. Pre-History of Cognitive Science. http://www/rc.umd.edu/cstahmer/cogsci/hobbes.html
Serendip. (2004) Rene Descartes and the Legacy of Mind/Body Dualism. http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/Mind/Descartes.html
Wikipedia. Thomas Hobbes. Media Wiki. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbes


Cite this Document:

"Hobbes Vs Descartes" (2004, March 05) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/hobbes-vs-descartes-164475

"Hobbes Vs Descartes" 05 March 2004. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/hobbes-vs-descartes-164475>

"Hobbes Vs Descartes", 05 March 2004, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/hobbes-vs-descartes-164475

Related Documents

1) and a boy who woke up one day to realise the world was not the world anymore, but something paper-ish. Flowers looked like flowers but were not, Milly, his friend, resembled Milly but was not the Milly of yesterday. Through his example, Bouwsma thought to illustrate that illusions may create similar perceptions to reality but ultimately the former can be depicted, as Tom, the boy, balked the phantasy

Descartes' famous maxim "I; I "? Why statement fundamental method? (3-4 Paragraphs) Describe Newton's method. How arrive conclusions? (3-4Paragraphs) Describe views John Locke: state nature, social contract, revolution, govern, property rights. Q1.Descartes Descartes began his famous series of Meditations with a resolution to doubt everything: this kind of hyperbolic skepticism was used to advance his use of the deductive approach to philosophy. Descartes was fundamentally a rationalist, and believed that truth

Sensory experiences are nor reliable for making any statements, since people often mistake one thing for another. (Descartes talks about mirages). Knowledge based on reasoning is not always trustworthy, because people often make mistakes. (adding numbers is a classical example). Finally, knowledge is deemed by Descartes to be illusory, since it may come from dreams or insanity or from demons able to deceive men by making them believe that

Rationalist Philosophers Descartes: Explain one of Descartes' arguments in Meditation VI for substance dualism. Critically discuss one possible objection to the argument. Descartes was not a nihilist or solipsist who truly doubted the existence of anything outside his own mind, and only used skepticism to arrive at clear and distinct ideas. He has already proved his own existence as a thinking being, and that God exists, along with his physical body and objects

Mind-Body Problem- Descartes The discussion over the relationship between mind and body that has been intriguing philosophers for a long time is divided into two broad categories: dualism and monism. According to dualism mind and body are two separate substances. There are several types of dualist views including parallelism, epiphenomenalism, occassionalism and interactionism. John Locke and Rene Descartes are among those who laid the foundation of this idea. Whereas Locke and

Mind Freedom and Konwledge
PAGES 5 WORDS 1709

Mind, Freedom and Knowledge Descartes argued that that all humans had both a body and mind, and that the mind was eternal while the body was subject to physical and material laws. The universe was divided between the mind and matter, and the physical world could be explained by mathematical and scientific laws. Hobbes, Locke and other political and philosophical theorists of the 17th Century were also influenced by the new