Australian Foreign Policy Qs
Prime Minister v. Foreign Policy Minister
Though in practice the highest political office in the land, the Prime Minister is still technically an appointed position, answerable not only to the full Parliament but also t the Governor-General and, of course, to the people of Australia. Thus, while the Prime Minister certainly enjoys a great deal of latitude in the appropriation of foreign policy issues, he is not able to make unilateral decisions at the level suggested by the prompt. Not only does the position of Prime Minister lack this authority in the official hierarchy, but it also defies the hierarchy of expertise that the ministerial system is meant to protect and encourage. Though the Prime Minister must be involved in most major issues involving the federal government, and quite often has the final say in such matters, the lower ministers exist precisely because their focus and expertise enables them to handle these situations more effectively than the Prime minister, whose role is often one of coordination and defining/maintaining an overall policy.
Another major factor that prevents the Prime Minister from unilaterally appropriating foreign policy issues is the very nature of foreign policy and international relations. There is often little choice for any individual regarding the prioritization of foreign policy issues, or the necessity of attention and/or action regarding any specific issue. Increased volatility since World War II, especially in Asia, has required Australia and its elected officials to take certain steps to ensure the security and prosperity of its people and itself as a nation. There are matters where quick decisions regarding foreign relations need to be made, but when it comes to establishing overall foreign policy and Australia's relation with the rest of the world, the Prime Minister is only a single member of the team.
The Stern Hu Case
The many different actors in the Stern Hu case are all attempting to exert influence on Australian foreign policy towards China in one way or another, but it is as yet unclear which if any of these forces has been/will be successful in their efforts. Stern Hu himself cannot actually exert much control from the Chinese prison where he is being held on charges of espionage. The Australian firm he worked for however, Rio Tinto, has been very vocal -- especially through Hu's former boss John Dougall -- in its attempts to get the federal government and Prime Minister Rudd in particular to act quickly to free Hu. This would require heavy Australian pressure on the Chinese government, adding tension to one of Australia's biggest trading relationships (a relationship which, ironically, Hu helped to create and solidify).
You’re 72% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.