Skip to main content
PRIVATE SCAN · FILE AUTO-DELETED

See what your professor's detector will see — before they do.

See which sentences read as AI-written while you can still revise them. Plagiarism and grammar checks included.

Up to 6,000 words · minimum 100 characters to scan
Works best on full paragraphs.
Drag & drop your file here
or · PDF, .docx or .txt · up to 5 MB
Working in Google Docs? Download it as Word (.docx), or just paste your text.
Up to 6,000 words · Most scans finish in under a minute. Results may occasionally be inconclusive.
Your paper stays private · Never shared with other users · Never published or sold
My Final Paper.docx · Scan Results
Final Paper.docx · 2,140 words Scan complete PDF
AI AI TEXT 3 passages
P PLAGIARISM 0 issues
Aa GRAMMAR 8 issues
✓ READS AS YOURS 75 sentences
Quality Management in the Restaurant Industry

The restaurant industry has experienced significant transformation in recent decades. In order to create a competitive advantage, companies must improve the quality of their products and services while reducing costs.

This means companies are required to develop and implement quality management systems that follow international standards.

Therefore, companies must develop quality control systems that are able to identify the required quality standards that apply to their products.

Another important aspect that companies must take into consideration refers to the evaluation of these control systems, ensuring continuous improvement.

ALL AI PLG GRM
3
passages worth
a second look
0Plagiarism
8Grammar
Results · 11
1 AI-like passage
2 Passive voice
3 AI-like passage
Scan complete Most scans finish in under a minute. Results may occasionally be inconclusive.
3 AI passages found See which sentences
11 fixes suggested Grammar rewrites included
The part nobody else publishes

Built not to flag your own writing.

Formal academic writing shouldn't get you accused. Careful prose, passive constructions, a tidy thesis paragraph — that is what good coursework looks like, and it is exactly what trips a lot of detectors.

Written it yourself and still worried? Run it. If something does flag, you'll see exactly what and can judge it for yourself.

In a recent test of 234 known human-written papers from our pre-2020 research library, our AI detector flagged none as AI-written. AI detection is not definitive, and results may differ for current student writing.

No detector is certain, ours included. We show you passages worth a second look, never a verdict on you. What you do with them is your call.

One upload, three checks
All three checks run on the same pass.
Leads every scan
AI Text Detection
Sentence-level, not a verdict. See which passages read as machine-written, so you can judge them yourself.
Plagiarism
Checked against the open web and our own collection of papers, with the source and a link.
Grammar
Subject–verb agreement, comma splices, dangling modifiers, run-ons.
How it works

From paper to report.

Most scans finish in under a minute. Results may occasionally be inconclusive. Paste or upload your draft, let TextChecker do its work, then review what it finds. No app to install, no learning curve.

Drop .docx, .pdf or .txt
or paste your text
1
Upload or paste
A Word document, a PDF, or plain text straight from your editor. We accept up to 6,000 words per scan.
AI ✓ Plagiarism Grammar
2
Three checks, one pass
All three checks run in one scan. Watch the progress or return to your results using the same browser.
AI-like writing
Source matches
Grammar notes
3
Read what it found
Every flagged passage is listed by type; grammar notes include the reason, and most include a suggested rewrite you can paste in.
Your report

Sentences, not a verdict.

We don't hand you one number for your whole paper. A score can't tell you what to fix, and it can't tell you whether it's wrong about you. You get the specific passages instead — and the reasoning behind each one.

  • Every writing issue says why it was flagged — the pattern, in plain language
  • Filter by category so you can work through one issue at a time
  • Resolve as you go — the report updates in real time
Final Paper.docx 2,140 WORDS · 78 SENTENCES
3
Passages worth a second look
2
Matched sources
11
Grammar & spelling
75
Sentences reading as yours
Matched passage 1 OF 2
Companies must develop quality control systems that are able to identify the required quality standards that apply to their products, the resources that are necessary to meet those standards, and the strategies that must be used in this direction.
📕 Quality Management Systems in International Business Hermansen, R. · Journal of Operations Management, 2019 88% match
Plagiarism

Find exact matches. With sources.

When something in your paper matches an existing source, TextChecker tells you exactly where — the publication, the author, the degree of overlap, and a link to the original. Cite it or rewrite it before you submit.

  • Checked against the open web and our own collection of 136,000+ papers
  • Every match shows the source title, author and how closely it overlaps
  • Catches verbatim copies and patchwork paraphrasing alike
  • Your paper is never published, sold, or shown to other users.
Rewrites

Don't just find issues — fix them.

For every grammar issue, TextChecker proposes a specific rewrite that addresses the issue while keeping your meaning and your voice. No more guessing at what's wrong — just paste in the fix and keep writing.

  • One click applies any suggestion
  • Each rewrite explains what changed and why, so you learn it once
  • Works on grammar, passive voice and awkward phrasing
  • You decide what to take. Nothing changes unless you apply it
⚑ Flagged · passive voice

These companies are required to develop and implement quality management systems that follow international standards.

↓
✓ Suggested rewrite

Companies must develop and implement quality management systems that meet international standards.

Converted to the active voice and replaced "follow" with the stronger "meet".

A worked example

One paragraph, and everything the report said about it.

You don't have to run a scan to see what comes back. Below is a single paragraph and the notes TextChecker returned on it — the flagged passages, the reason each one was flagged, and the suggested rewrite, copied from the report without edits.

The paragraph 226 WORDS · SCANNED IN 22 SEC

Mitigation strategies include expanding urban forestry programs, mandating reflective roofing materials in new construction, and converting underutilized parking areas into permeable green space. However, the implementation of these measures requires sustained municipal investment and coordination across multiple agencies, which has proven difficult in practice. It is also the case that the benefits of these interventions are distributed unevenly. Cities have been shown by studies to prioritize visible projects in commercial districts over the residential blocks where heat exposure is highest, and this is a pattern that repeats itself year after year in city after city.

We wrote this paragraph as a demonstration, with the help of an AI assistant, and scanned it on 24 September 2026. The AI check flagged all four sentences — which, in this case, is the detector being right. Read what a detector can and can’t tell you for why we still refuse to turn that into a verdict.

Grammar & writing — 4 of the 8 notes on this document VERBATIM FROM THE REPORT
⚑ Flagged · wordiness

It is also the case that the benefits of these interventions are distributed unevenly.

↓
✓ Suggested rewrite

Moreover, the benefits of these interventions are distributed unevenly.

“It is also the case that” is filler that delays the main clause without adding meaning.

⚑ Flagged · passive voice

Cities have been shown by studies to prioritize visible projects in commercial districts over the residential blocks where heat exposure is highest

↓
✓ Suggested rewrite

Studies show that cities prioritize visible projects in commercial districts over the residential blocks where heat exposure is highest

Passive construction buries the active subject and weakens the claim’s assertiveness in academic writing.

⚑ Flagged · missing citation

Cities have been shown by studies to prioritize visible projects in commercial districts over the residential blocks where heat exposure is highest

↓
✓ Suggested rewrite

Studies show that cities prioritize visible projects in commercial districts over residential blocks where heat exposure is highest (Author, Year).

Attributing behavior to unnamed “studies” without a citation undermines academic credibility and verifiability.

⚑ Flagged · wordiness

and this is a pattern that repeats itself year after year in city after city

↓
✓ Suggested rewrite

a pattern repeated consistently across cities and years

The phrase is redundant and informal; a tighter construction preserves the emphasis more efficiently.

Sources: all 11 passages in the document were searched against the open web and our library, and none matched published text. A search index never covers everything, so that is not proof of originality — it means nothing was found, and the report says exactly that and stops there.

The honest version

What a detector can and can’t tell you.

It cannot tell you who wrote something
An AI detector does not read intent and has no record of authorship to consult. It measures statistical properties of the text — how predictable each word is given the ones before it, how much sentence length and structure vary. It measures patterns in writing that may resemble AI-generated text. Its scores and flags are not proof of who wrote a passage, and no score establishes authorship.
It cannot clear you either
The inverse claim is just as weak. Nothing flagged means nothing crossed the detector’s thresholds on this pass. It does not certify that a document was written without a model, and it is not proof you can hand to anyone. We report a clean AI result as “nothing flagged” rather than “human-written”, because the second sentence claims something the first one does not.
Why careful academic writing gets flagged
Formal academic prose is deliberately uniform. You are taught to hold a steady register, to open with signposting connectors — however, moreover, consequently — and to prefer the precise general noun over the vivid particular one. Those are the same properties that make text look predictable to a detector: low variance in sentence length, high-frequency vocabulary, conventional transitions. A student following the rules of the genre produces prose whose surface statistics resemble a model’s, regardless of who typed it. The worked example above shows the shape of it: four sentences in one paragraph, all flagged. We drafted that paragraph with an AI assistant, so there the detector was right — written by hand in the same register it would look much the same to the same measurement, which is why we will not print a verdict on it.
What it can do, and what we do with it
What the measurement genuinely supports is the statement “this passage has the properties the detector associates with generated text”. That is worth knowing. If you are about to submit and four sentences read that way, it’s worth knowing so you can re-read those passages. The free result shows counts; the full report shows flagged passages for you to review, alongside the limitations of the checks. We show the percentage of your text contained in passages flagged for possible AI-like writing. This is not a probability that AI was used.
Plagiarism is a different kind of limit
The similarity check is not probabilistic in the same way. Either a run of words appears in a source we can reach or it does not. Its limit is coverage: no index covers everything, so a match is evidence and a non-match is only the absence of evidence. When part of a document could not be verified, the report says so and says how many passages, rather than presenting a partial check as a total. A similarity figure that quietly covers half your paper is worse than no figure at all.
How it compares

One tool. All the checks.

Grammarly handles grammar. Turnitin handles plagiarism, if your school pays for it — and you don't get to see the result first. TextChecker does both, plus AI detection, flow and rewrites, before you submit.

Feature Grammarly Turnitin TextChecker
Grammar & spelling✓—✓
Plagiarism detection—✓✓
AI text detection—✓✓
Shows you which sentences—Instructor view only✓
Explains each writing issue——✓
Grammar rewrite suggestionsBasic—✓
You can run it yourself✓Institution only✓
CostSold separatelyVia your schoolIncluded with PaperDue plans or available as a one-time purchase from $3.99

Stop second-guessing. Run the check.

See what a detector sees in your own writing — while there's still time to do something about it. You'll see how many passages were flagged, and where.

Check my paper

Your paper stays private · File auto-deleted

Got questions

The ones students actually ask

How much does TextChecker cost?
Scan a paper to see what it catches. Full reports are included with PaperDue plans or available as a one-time purchase from $3.99. Plans also include the AI writing assistant, 135,000+ paper examples and every writing tool.
What counts as one "scan"?
One scan = one document up to 6,000 words. Each scan runs AI text, plagiarism, and grammar — including spelling, punctuation and flow — and produces one full report. Re-scanning the same document counts as a new scan, so make your fixes first before re-running. Anonymous scans show how many passages read as machine-written; the full report shows which sentences.
How long does a scan take?
Most scans finish in under a minute. Results may occasionally be inconclusive. Longer documents, or papers with many sources, take proportionally longer. Guest scan results are displayed directly on the results page.
What exactly does TextChecker scan for?
Three checks: plagiarism (checked against the open web and our own collection of papers), AI-generated text detection that highlights the specific sentences, grammar, spelling, punctuation, flow and clarity (passive voice, sentence variety, readability), and AI-powered rewrite suggestions for grammar issues.
How does the AI detection actually work?
We use a dedicated AI-detection service and show you the specific sentences it identifies, rather than one score for the whole paper. Formal academic writing can read as machine-written, so treat the highlights as passages worth re-reading, not a verdict. Every scan shows the count when the AI check completes; the full report shows the sentences.
Is my paper kept private?
Yes. Your paper is never shown to other users, never published or sold, and never added to the plagiarism-comparison corpus. We delete your uploaded file as soon as we extract its text. Scans saved to your account stay with your account. For scans without an account: After 90 days (12 months for a purchased report, unless you delete it sooner), your text is deleted, along with every excerpt, suggested rewrite and fingerprint of it; we keep only the scan’s scores, counts and issue categories. Deleted data may remain in backups for up to 14 days before those backup copies expire.
Will my results match other checkers?
No two checkers give identical results. TextChecker runs its own checks independently — use it to review your own draft, cite your sources and revise anything unclear.