Paper Example Undergraduate 867 words

Alcohol and drug policies at Drexel University

Last reviewed: March 14, 2013 ~5 min read
Abstract

The paper is actually an editing of a job that had already beeen done. It is on Alcohol and drug policy in Drexel. There are areas that were highlighted by the professor that needed to be changed as well as be supported by additional data in order to meet the threshold of academic material.

Alcohol and Drug Policy in Drexel

Drug and alcohol policy

I like where the paper ends up . . . As I see it you're arguing that the current system at Drexel treats drugs and alcohol as fundamentally different problems, and that this crude distinction leads to misperceptions: 1) that alcohol isn't really as serious a concern as it should be, but also 2) that some drugs are realistically worse than others. An approach that labeled all of them as "drugs" but treats them on a sliding scale from least to most offensive would help to remedy both issues.

I like that idea, but it seems like very little in the paper leads us there. When you're arguing for a policy change like this it makes sense to name what that proposal is up front, so that everything we read in the essay lends support to it. After the first paragraph we get a description of the drug and alcohol policy at Drexel (but with little discussion as to why it's a problem), and then this is followed by the summary of a lot of information about alcohol and drugs from the AA website which just talks about why drugs are a problem in the workplace. Some of this is indirectly useful, but you need to make the effort of explaining how it relates to students, and it would be better to simply start with a source that talks about student drug and alcohol use in its own right. The bottom line though is that several pages come off as being just about why drugs and alcohol are a problem, not why one policy may be better than another for addressing it. I feel like you there are good arguments you can make in defense of your policy statement, but you have to actually make them: how might you demonstrate that students have misconceptions about how harmful alcohol is in relation to drugs? What have you read that confirms that this kind of misconception is harmful -- and often stems from poorly designed drug and alcohol policies? In what ways have Drexel students been harmed by the one-size-fits-all-zero-tolerance policy for drugs? Can you think of specific instances or students whose stories you could tell? This might also help us see where you're coming from and give you the opportunity for stronger appeals to pathos.

Grade: C

Justin Cohen

Here at Drexel students have to follow certain rules and guidelines set up by the school. These guidelines address not only the welfare of its students, but ensure the safety and security of its students. Some might view Drexel's policies as harsh and unfair, yet others may view them as not harsh enough. We are proposing a new set of rules and guidelines Drexel should follow to ensure the success of its students moving forward.

The current policy for the underage consumption of alcohol here at Drexel University goes as followed. Obviously the consumption of alcohol under the age of 21 is highlighted in Drexel drinking policy; in fact Drexel's alcohol policy is in compliance with all of the state of Philadelphia's alcohol policy. Such rules include the Possession, use, or distribution of alcohol by underage students, disruptive conduct due as a result of intoxication and/or providing a space for the consumption of alcohol by underage persons, in addition, the possession of kegs and other bulk containers is prohibited.

If caught under the influence of alcohol by either a Residential advisor, staff member, or Drexel Public safety officer, students would suffer the following consequences.

Strike one- A three-strike system would take effect, strike one being a one hundred dollar fine, A note to parents, Either therapy or a drug and alcohol class, and finally one year of probation which if violated will bring you to your second offence.

Strike two - involves a $200.00 fine, Deferred Loss of Housing and/or Deferred Suspension, Parental Notification and finally an extension of probation.

The third strike- includes a suspension from the University and/or one or more of the following: Loss of Housing Privileges, Deferred Suspension from University, $200.00 fine and Parental Notification.

The Drug policy at Drexel in respect to the Alcohol policy is not nearly as liberal. The possession, and/or use of drugs if not medically prescribed is prohibited, no discussion. The sale and/or distribution of narcotics by an unlicensed vendor are also prohibited. Drug paraphernalia such as bongs, water pipes, and pipes are also prohibited on Drexel property.

You’re 86% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2013). Alcohol and drug policies at Drexel University. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/alcohol-and-drug-policy-in-86689

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.