Plato and Homer's conceptions of good citizenship
✍️ How to write this paper — guide & tools ▾
Ancient Greek Writers
Throughout the course of human history the definition of good citizenship is continually evolving. This is based upon changing social standards and how they are applied to the actions of different individuals. In ancient Greece, there were conflicting views as to which attributes were most desirable. To fully understand the differences within their society requires comparing the ideas of Plato and Homer. Together, these elements will highlight what it means to be a good citizen.
Plato's Views on Citizenship
Plato believed that anyone who is considered to be a good citizen must embrace a number of attributes in the process. The most notable include: the ability to remain composed / act dignified, honesty, someone who will not publically grieve the death of their friends / loved ones, a willingness to die in battle, respect / striving for worthiness and the realization that good people will meet favorable ends. These different attributes are showing how Plato believed that the ideal citizen is a person who is selfless and willing to sacrifice more for the betterment of society.
This means that they will not become involved in issues which are placing their own self-interest over that of everyone else. Instead, they will engage in actions that will benefit those around them and set the example for others to follow. When this happens, everybody can honor and respect this individual. As they have the ability to demonstrate that they are offering more to someone and will engage in actions for the betterment of society. This will highlight how they have a sense of moral clarity about doing the right thing for the betterment of the group.
Plato vs. Homer's Views of Good Citizenship
Plato's views of good citizenship are different from Homer in that the ideal citizen must possess a certain amount of vigor. This is achieved by showing acts of selflessness and inner strength through the actions they take in public. While Homer, believes that the ideal person should have a sense of determination and the ability to overcome a variety of challenges. This means that they will focus on the group to a certain extent. Yet, they will use these attributes to beat tremendous odds in order to achieve the larger objectives.
Clearly, the definition of a good citizen will vary between Plato's and Homer's interpretations. What makes someone strong in the eyes of Plato; is they will engage in acts of selflessness for the betterment of society. Whereas Homer, feels that the ideal person will have a certain amount of these characteristic. At the same time, they will be able to overcome tremendous challenges through perseverance.
Create your account
- Plato. The Republic. London: Cambridge University Press, 1966
- Bloom, Howard. Homer. New York, NY: Chelsea House, 2001.
- Fiero, Gloria. Landmarks in Humanities. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill, 2012.
- Chicago Format. http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html ↗
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.